imgur.com

[Allen]

As a regular Reddit user, I enjoy Imgur.  I wonder why, though, the 
javascript doesn't seem to work.  The Error console says: Timestamp: 
2/5/2017 11:06:25 PM

Error: SecurityError: The operation is insecure.
Source File: http://s.imgur.com/min/global.js?1486166913
Line: 14

Is there a preference I can configure to work around this?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Why is LibreJS incompatible with Seamonkey?

[Rainer Bielefeld]

On 05.02.2017 23:14, Richmond wrote:
> "There was an error during installation: Extension is invalid"

Hallo,

in install.rdf I see:



  {ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}
  38.0a1
  *

That's FF only.

You can try this converter
, for AMO
hosted add-ons together with this browsing tool
.

What was the answer of LibreJS-staff to your question?

CU

Rainer
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Why is LibreJS incompatible with Seamonkey?

[Richmond]

Richmond  writes:

> I tried 2.40 and 2.50a2. I also created a manifest.json to try to load
> with the about:debugging but got:
>
> "There was an error during installation: Extension is invalid"

https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/librejs/gnu_librejs-6.0.13-fx.xpi

https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/

:/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Ray_Net]

EE wrote on 05-02-17 21:58:

Ray Davison wrote:

Bret Busby wrote:

 what is the command to show the version number
that is installed, without having to load the application?


Can you run SM?
Does "Help" appear at the top of the SM window?
If you click it does that produce a drop down that includes "About SM"?
If you click that does it yield the SM version?

That is standard for maybe all apps.

Ray


With Windows, can you not right-click the filename of the application 
and get information that way?



"Properties" then "Details" YEAH !
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Why is LibreJS incompatible with Seamonkey?

[Richmond]

I tried 2.40 and 2.50a2. I also created a manifest.json to try to load
with the about:debugging but got:

"There was an error during installation: Extension is invalid"

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: I am going to ask a question that will seem dumb to a number of you...

[Pat Connors]

I am in the same situation. I used Adrian's 2.47 and now 2.48. I think 
you should wait for an official 2.48. Because downgrading can 
sometimes break stuff.


Thanks much for getting back to me and not calling me dumb. :-)
This was my instincts also but not being an expert in this field, I 
thought I would ask and see what others thought.


--
Pat Connors
http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[EE]

Ray Davison wrote:

Bret Busby wrote:

 what is the command to show the version number
that is installed, without having to load the application?


Can you run SM?
Does "Help" appear at the top of the SM window?
If you click it does that produce a drop down that includes "About SM"?
If you click that does it yield the SM version?

That is standard for maybe all apps.

Ray


With Windows, can you not right-click the filename of the application 
and get information that way?


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 10.50a2

[EE]

David H. Durgee wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

On 2/4/2017 at 9:25 PM, Arnie Goetchius's prodigious digits fired off
with great aplomb:

Luis wrote:

Just installed and so far everything goes smooth. However, since SM
looks so
ancient I wonder when will be modernized or at least its user
interface revamped.


I have been using SM and its predecessors since I retired over 20
years ago. SM
is just like me: ancient and I like it that way.



ROFLMAO!

Me too, Arnie.

"Revamped interface?  We don't need no freaking revamped interface!!!"



Someone correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the entire interface pretty
much defined via themes?  So if he isn't happy with the defaults
available let him start with the theme closest to what he wants and then
tweak it to his preferences.

Dave


You can also move toolbar buttons around, set up new toolbars, add 
buttons, do all sorts of things like that to the interface.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: I am going to ask a question that will seem dumb to a number of you...

[Mason83]

On 05/02/2017 21:31, Pat Connors wrote:

> "SeaMonkey 2.46 is now available for openSUSE Leap 42.1 and Leap 42.2. 
>
> "
> 
> Okay, I am now using 2.48 after using 2.47 (Adrian builds). I have had 
> no problems with either and hesitate to go back to 2.46 if not needed. 
> If you think I should go back to the new 2.46 that now covers the 
> security breeches, please tell me why.
> Thanks much in advance for your patience.

I am in the same situation. I used Adrian's 2.47 and now 2.48.
I think you should wait for an official 2.48.
Because downgrading can sometimes break stuff.

Regards.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 10.50a2

[EE]

Arnie Goetchius wrote:

Luis wrote:

Just installed and so far everything goes smooth. However, since SM looks so
ancient I wonder when will be modernized or at least its user interface 
revamped.


I have been using SM and its predecessors since I retired over 20 years ago. SM
is just like me: ancient and I like it that way.

The interface can be rearranged.  It is fine, and being configurable 
makes it more flexible to suit individual needs.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

I am going to ask a question that will seem dumb to a number of you...

[Pat Connors]

"SeaMonkey 2.46 is now available for openSUSE Leap 42.1 and Leap 42.2. 
"



Okay, I am now using 2.48 after using 2.47 (Adrian builds). I have had 
no problems with either and hesitate to go back to 2.46 if not needed. 
If you think I should go back to the new 2.46 that now covers the 
security breeches, please tell me why.

Thanks much in advance for your patience.

--
Pat Connors
http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 10.50a2

[David H. Durgee]

Ed Mullen wrote:

On 2/4/2017 at 9:25 PM, Arnie Goetchius's prodigious digits fired off
with great aplomb:

Luis wrote:

Just installed and so far everything goes smooth. However, since SM
looks so
ancient I wonder when will be modernized or at least its user
interface revamped.


I have been using SM and its predecessors since I retired over 20
years ago. SM
is just like me: ancient and I like it that way.



ROFLMAO!

Me too, Arnie.

"Revamped interface?  We don't need no freaking revamped interface!!!"



Someone correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the entire interface pretty 
much defined via themes?  So if he isn't happy with the defaults 
available let him start with the theme closest to what he wants and then 
tweak it to his preferences.


Dave
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

openSUSE Security Update: Security update for seamonkey

[WaltS48]

SeaMonkey 2.46 is now available for openSUSE Leap 42.1 and Leap 42.2.



--
Visit Pittsburgh 
Coexist 
National Popular Vote 
Ubuntu 16.04LTS
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: What Version of Sea Monkey is on my Computer?

[xcomm]

loriv...@gmail.com a écrit :

How can I tell what version of Sea Monkey is running on my PC - Windows 7?


You can write your message with SeaMonkey.
See this link to do that for exemple :


Then on your published message, you can select it on type "CTRL +u", and 
see the user-agent line to see the application version that is used.

Xavier
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Just wondering............

[Daniel]

On 4/02/2017 11:08 PM, Mr. Ed wrote:

On 02/04/17 6:59 AM, Mr. Ed wrote:

On 02/04/17 4:19 AM, Daniel wrote:

On 4/02/2017 10:25 AM, WaltS48 wrote:

On 02/03/2017 03:24 PM, Mr. Ed wrote:

Just wondering why the majority of the posts do not mention, in the
Subject, The
OS and SM version together.
While it's true that some (many?) bugs will have an effect on more
than one OS
or SM version we would not have to look at message headers to
determine what
could be a simple entry in the Subject field.

Just wondering...



To add to what Paul indicated.

Some of us have, "mailnews.headers.showUserAgent" set to "true" so we
see your user agent in the message header.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.48


which makes me wonder ... as the latest SM available from
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ is V 2.46, is Mr Ed really using a V 2.48
or is he using a V 2.48b1 or similar??


Whatever 'UserAgent' says.  I haven't changed it except to 'not advertise FF'
option.

https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/


Woops, wrong place for 2.48 -  It's here (UNOFFICIAL):

http://www.m64.info/index.php/seamonkey-64-bit-download

One wonders who runs m64.info, as the real SeaMonkey website is 
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ !!


--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.46 Build identifier: 20161213183751

or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.38 Build identifier: 20150903203501

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey