Re: Should the size of the memory cache be a setting in preferences?

2019-02-26 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Yesterday, I wrote:


Pref set to 1048576. Let's see what happens.


OK, 24 hours of life with a larger memory cache have shown:

1) No dramatic improvement in overall performance;

2) A lack of hangs when SM reaches 25% CPU usage -- it hasn't reached 
that level during the test period. Rather, it seems to peak at 15–18%.


So there may well be something to what Dirk Munk advised. I'll keep 
running with this pref setting and watch for the hangs I used to get 
regularly. When opportunities arise, I'll push it harder.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: dropbox forum fail with seamonkey

2019-02-26 Thread meagain

 Original Message 

https://www.dropboxforum.com/t5/English/ct-p/English

displays only text with no formatting, et cetera, when using SeaMonkey.

Other browsers seem fine.  I've checked images, script settings but ...


It is now working again!  I think DB changed the code, but it's hard to 
prove!


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Remembering Password In SM 2.49.4 W10 Pro Desktop

2019-02-26 Thread bo1953
Hello all - created a new profile for SM, usually there is a check box 
for remember password in the SM mail window.


There is none, where do I need to go in order to enable this function?

TIA - bo1953

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: How set default text encoding display in Seamonkey Mail ?

2019-02-26 Thread Rubens via support-seamonkey

Paul Bergsagel wrote on 26/02/2019 02:14:

Rubens wrote:


Hello all,


I am receiving some Unicode-encoded e-mails which look garbled because
Seamonkey always try to display them with Western encoding in the first place,
so I always have to manually change the Text Encoding option for every Unicode 
e-mail I read.

In the "Text Encoding - Message Display" preferences setting I tried both the "Default for 
current locale" and the "Other (including Western European)"
but none gets what I need (to force opening every e-mail in Unicode viewing 
mode).

Can anybody help ? My Seamonkey version is 2.49.4, language UK English and my 
OS is Windows 7  Pro 64-bit, language US English.


Thanks in advance,


Rubens

Unicode must be set separately for the browser and for email.

To Set Unicode for email:
   --open an email window and go to the menus item  "View"->"Text Encoding" and 
select "Unicode" at the top of the list.


To Set Unicode for the browser:
   --open a browser window and go to the menus item  "View"->"Text Encoding" and 
select "Unicode" at the top of the list.



I did that, but for email the setting does not stick, so for every single 
message I have to redo that.

Even if I open the message, set to Unicode, close the message and reopen it 
seconds later, the setting always comes back as Western.

For the browser, the setting never changes by itself as it does for email.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


browser.contentHandlers.types.* (was: Re: dropbox forum fail with seamonkey)

2019-02-26 Thread Nuno Silva
On 2019-02-26, Daniel wrote:

> meagain wrote on 26/02/2019 1:26 AM:
>>
>> [ BTW, In the config file I noticed a batch of
>>
>> browser.contentHandlers.types.0.title;Feedly
>>
>> up to ...types.5...  which seem excessive - are these needed?]
>>
> Sorry, Meagain, that's beyond my knowledge. Maybe someone else will
> drop by with the relevant knowledge  or, better yet, you could
> start another thread asking this question.

I have these settings here too. Looking at their values, these seem to
be the known handlers for RSS and Atom feeds. These will be shown, for
example, on top of the default(?) browser view for such feeds, in the
drop-down box next to "Subscribe to this feed using".

(If you need an example feed to check this:
https://www.seamonkey-project.org/news-atom )

-- 
Nuno Silva
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Should the size of the memory cache be a setting in preferences?

2019-02-26 Thread Dirk Munk

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Lee wrote:


On 2/25/19, Paul B. Gallagher  wrote:


OK, so the workaround for the CPU cap is to use less CPU time?


I think the "CPU cap" you're seeing is a single logical CPU running
100% busy.  If your system has four logical CPUs and one of them is
100% busy that'd be 25% overall cpu utilization.  If you're on windows
10 you can check by

start / Windows System / Task Manager
click on the performance tab, then cpu
right click on the graph, change graph to, logical processors


The Task Manager is how I know how much CPU is being used, and even 
though I didn't say so explicitly, I thought I implied that was my 
theory too, that one CPU is maxed out. Looking at the performance tab 
on my system, it already shows four separate graphs, one for each 
processor. But they all seem to be busy at roughly equal levels, so 
perhaps something else is going on.



And the way to do that is to reduce disk caching (which I'm
probably not doing since I have 5-6 GB of RAM free) by increasing
memory cache?


I think the suggestion is to reduce cpu usage by keeping more stuff
in memory & not wasting cpu cycles by sending stuff off to the disk 
(either swap or cache) & then reading it back in.


I heard that, but I'm skeptical. I don't think my system is stalling 
due to paging or caching to disk, but today's test will show whether 
Dirk's right or wrong.


Another possible scenario (I thought we grew out of this decades ago) 
is that the program doesn't know how to use all the available RAM, or 
something is denying it access beyond its allocation. 


That is exactly what is happening! Seamonkey would love to use more RAM 
by putting more data in the memory cache, but the setting of 200 MB 
makes that impossible. It is not allowed to use more RAM. If you would 
set the memory cache to 16 GB (in theory), you would most likely see 
that Seamonkey only takes a very small amount of the 16 GB, it doesn't 
need more. To make this very clear, that 16 GB is not allocated to 
Seamonkey, but Seamonkey is allowed to ask for up to 16 GB from Windows 
if it needs more RAM.


But that wouldn't explain why the hangs occur when CPU usage reaches 
25% and not when RAM usage approaches 8 GB (which is when I'd expect 
disk thrashing to start).


Yes it does. Seamonkey is so busy with its own housekeeping, trying to 
move data in and out from the cache, that it hardly has any time left 
for processing the data.


If all the applications on your system need more than 8 GB in total, 
then Windows will start swapping. That does not happen. Your problem is 
that Seamonkey reaches the maximum RAM limit it is allowed to use, but 
that is the result of the setting in the configuration file.


In fact, in the four years I've had this system, I've never seen CPU 
usage over about 26-27% no matter how hard I pushed it.





___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: dropbox forum fail with seamonkey

2019-02-26 Thread Daniel

meagain wrote on 26/02/2019 1:26 AM:

 Original Message 





Did you change the setting as I suggested??


Yes indeed.


Good.



Next thing, some sites, apparently, spit the dummy if FF is not the last
thing mentioned  whilst others spit the dummy if anything apart from
FF is mentioned.

These changes are accomplished by editing your config file. Let us know
if you need this!


Yes, I think I do.

[ BTW, In the config file I noticed a batch of

browser.contentHandlers.types.0.title;Feedly

up to ...types.5...  which seem excessive - are these needed?]

Sorry, Meagain, that's beyond my knowledge. Maybe someone else will drop 
by with the relevant knowledge  or, better yet, you could start 
another thread asking this question.


--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171016030418


User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Should the size of the memory cache be a setting in preferences?

2019-02-26 Thread Dirk Munk

Lee wrote:

On 2/25/19, Paul B. Gallagher  wrote:

Dirk Munk wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Dirk Munk wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Dirk Munk wrote:


Also, keep in mind that the memory cache setting is a maximum value
that Seamonkey can use. At the moment I have the cache setting at 4
GB, but when I look at the task manager, the whole application uses
about 3.6 GB, That means Seamonkey is only using a fraction of that
allowed 4 GB.

I have 8 GB of RAM, but SM doesn't come anywhere near that. When I
have a lot going on, it seems to peak in the high one-gig or the low
two-gig range (maybe I'm not pushing it as hard as you do). At any
rate, that's not a limiting factor for me. (FWIW, I "let SeaMonkey
manage the size of my cache," but as noted upthread that's the disk
cache.)

But I have noticed that there does seem to be a cap on CPU usage.
When it gets to about 25%, SM slows to a crawl or even hangs (the
cursor turns to a spinning ring and the screen goes pale in Win7),
and the only solutions are either force-close it through Windows or
wait three to five minutes until it thinks things though. This even
happens when there are plenty of CPU cycles available. Other apps
are unaffected, so I just switch to another and do something useful
while I'm waiting.

In that case try to change the memory cache by using about:config.
Look for the entry browser.cache.memory.capacity, it most likely
shows 20. Change it to 524288 (512 MB) or 1048576 (1 GB), and see
what happens. As you can see, I like to use values based on powers of
2.

Uh, what would that have to do with a CPU usage cap?

Caching to disk means reading and writing to disk, moving data around
etc. That can be very CPU intensive, certainly when it's becoming very
difficult to do so.

OK, so the workaround for the CPU cap is to use less CPU time?

I think the "CPU cap" you're seeing is a single logical CPU running
100% busy.  If your system has four logical CPUs and one of them is
100% busy that'd be 25% overall cpu utilization.  If you're on windows
10 you can check by

start / Windows System / Task Manager
click on the performance tab, then cpu
right click on the graph, change graph to, logical processors


Indeed, I don't know how well the multi-theaded implementation of 
Seamonkey is. But even if it is good, then one thread may be responsible 
for maxing out one CPU core, and the other CPU cores are idling. That is 
the problem with a multi-core CPU, they only can use their full power if 
there are enough independent threads to keep every core busy.


If however you have a single thread application, then a multi-core CPU 
hardly brings you anything, and you should look for a CPU with a high 
single core performance.






And the
way to do that is to reduce disk caching (which I'm probably not doing
since I have 5-6 GB of RAM free) by increasing memory cache?

I think the suggestion is to reduce cpu usage by keeping more stuff in
memory & not wasting cpu cycles by sending stuff off to the disk
(either swap or cache) & then reading it back in.


Exactly.



Lee


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey