Re: Unsupported Browser Notice - SOLVED

[Felix Miata]

Daniel composed on 2019-04-29 14:27 (UTC+1000):

> Brian Mailman wrote:

>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

>>> Brian Mailman wrote:

 Hi, I'm now receiving a notice of "Unsupported Browser" and that my
 Seamonkey is "outdated" when I try to go to davita.com .

 The notice recommends Firefox, among others. I forget where the
 setting is, but I do have this copy of Seamonkey set to identify
 itself as Firefox!

 Help?  Thanks in advance.

>>> Simply disable "Advertise Firefox compatibility" and reload:

>>> Edit | Preferences | Advanced | HTTP Networking

>> That did it.

>> Thanks to everyone who had the same/similar suggestion, it's greatly 
>> appreciated!!  You folks are the best!

> Hmm! NOT advertising 'Firefox' fixed a problem!! That's different!! ;-) 

I've been not advertising Firefox for more years than I can remember, with the
exception of 5 general.useragent.override.* settings, where Firefox and Windows
(instead of Linux) are advertised, and SeaMonkey is not.
-- 
Evolution as taught in public schools is religion, not science.

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unsupported Browser Notice - SOLVED

[Daniel]

Brian Mailman wrote on 29/04/2019 7:18 AM:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Brian Mailman wrote:


Windows 10
Seamonkey 2.48

Hi, I'm now receiving a notice of "Unsupported Browser" and that my
Seamonkey is "outdated" when I try to go to davita.com .

The notice recommends Firefox, among others. I forget where the
setting is, but I do have this copy of Seamonkey set to identify
itself as Firefox!

Help?  Thanks in advance.


Simply disable "Advertise Firefox compatibility" and reload:

Edit | Preferences | Advanced | HTTP Networking


That did it.

Thanks to everyone who had the same/similar suggestion, it's greatly 
appreciated!!  You folks are the best!


B/


Hmm! NOT advertising 'Firefox' fixed a problem!! That's different!! ;-)
--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171016030418


User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unsupported Browser Notice - SOLVED

[Paul B. Gallagher]

Brian Mailman wrote:

Ant wrote:

You might have to change your web browser's user agent. Its home page
worked for me with "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0" on my decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1
PC's SeaMonkey v2.49.4 web browser. Maybe try changing its user agent?



Thanks.  What is this "v2.49.4"?  I'm using 2.48 for Windows... when I 
click on "Check on Update" from the Help menu, it tells me I have the 
latest update...


As noted elsewhere in this thread, automatic update checks are broken. 
Go to the SeaMonkey home page and you'll see that 2.49.4 is the latest 
release.




--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Staying alive - how can I help?

[Reiner Schug]

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> What is needed mostly are helping hands. No volunteers/devs no SeaMonkey in
> the long term. You can only do so much with money if you don't have the time
> to support paid people.
Mozilla is completely nuts...

now they will shutdown their IRC servers, because
"In short, it’s no longer practical or responsible for us to keep that forum 
alive."

http://exple.tive.org/blarg/2019/04/26/synchronous-text/

they have millions of $$$, morons...
next: shutdown newsgroups?

tell me where I can help, 20+ years using SM, Mozilla Suite, Netscape
C/C++/Web

ciao..

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unsupported Browser Notice

[Lee]

On 4/28/19, Brian Mailman wrote:
> Uh, no.  I'm using 2.48.  When I use "Check for Updates" I'm told that
> this is the latest version.  Although downthread I see references to
> 2.49.4. I'll assume for now, until I'm corrected that this is a
> Linux/Unix version.

SeaMonkey "Check for Updates" functionality is broken :(
The last official release is 2.49.4 - get it here
  https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/
and the not-quite-official-but-has-some-fixes release is here
  https://www.wg9s.com/comm-esr/

I haven't been keeping up, so I don't know how good the wg9s.com 2.53
or 2.57 releases are.

Regards,
Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unsupported Browser Notice - SOLVED

[Brian Mailman]

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Brian Mailman wrote:


Windows 10
Seamonkey 2.48

Hi, I'm now receiving a notice of "Unsupported Browser" and that my
Seamonkey is "outdated" when I try to go to davita.com .

The notice recommends Firefox, among others. I forget where the
setting is, but I do have this copy of Seamonkey set to identify
itself as Firefox!

Help?  Thanks in advance.


Simply disable "Advertise Firefox compatibility" and reload:

Edit | Preferences | Advanced | HTTP Networking


That did it.

Thanks to everyone who had the same/similar suggestion, it's greatly 
appreciated!!  You folks are the best!


B/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unsupported Browser Notice - SOLVED

[Brian Mailman]

Ant wrote:

You might have to change your web browser's user agent. Its home page
worked for me with "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0" on my decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1
PC's SeaMonkey v2.49.4 web browser. Maybe try changing its user agent?



Thanks.  What is this "v2.49.4"?  I'm using 2.48 for Windows... when I 
click on "Check on Update" from the Help menu, it tells me I have the 
latest update...


B/

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unsupported Browser Notice

[Brian Mailman]

Dirk Fieldhouse wrote:

On 24/04/19 20:50, Brian Mailman wrote:

Windows 10
Seamonkey 2.48

Hi, I'm now receiving a notice of "Unsupported Browser" and that my
Seamonkey is "outdated" when I try to go to davita.com .

The notice recommends Firefox, among others. I forget where the setting
is, but I do have this copy of Seamonkey set to identify itself as Firefox!


Normally I'd say bin the site until the backer learns how to make one
that works, but this looks like something people might need.


Why, yes--it is.


Does the site work apart from the notice?

If so, some config on your side would avoid the notice. For instance
user CSS like this

  .dv-unsupported-browsers {
display: none;
  }
would hide the notice, or user JS like this

  for (let t of document.querySelectorAll('.dv-unsupported-browsers')) {
  t.remove();
  }
would delete it.

An extension such as Stylish helps to apply user CSS. A NoScript
surrogate helps to apply user JS to specific sites.

Or change the version of Firefox that you're spoofing to a later one?


Uh, no.  I'm using 2.48.  When I use "Check for Updates" I'm told that 
this is the latest version.  Although downthread I see references to 
2.49.4. I'll assume for now, until I'm corrected that this is a 
Linux/Unix version.


Thanks for your help.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [ SOLVED ] Re: How to have a BLACK body text in the Signature Part ?

[Ray_Net]

WaltS48 wrote on 28-04-19 01:28:

On 4/27/19 6:19 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

WaltS48 wrote on 27-04-19 02:12:

On 4/26/19 7:20 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

WaltS48 wrote on 27-04-19 00:03:

On 4/26/19 5:51 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 26-04-19 19:30:

Ray_Net wrote:

You are probably true ...but it's a pity that SM modify the 
text-color (changing to GREY) of the html-signature where the 
color is BLACK.


I think that i found the solution - using about:config I do a 
search for 99 and I found the "msgcompose.text_color" 
variable with "user set" string at "#99"


Uh, how is "#99" gray? Looks blue to me.


YES, You are true. I remember now that I change the text I wrote 
to blue.

So this is not my problem.
Therefore the problem is still open.
How to avoid the lighter font the signature ? I prefer a solid 
black.
With text in blue and signature in black THIS indicate also to 
the recipient that it is a signature and not part of the message.


How do you know what the recipient's Display settings are?

Just because it looks pretty to you in the Composition window, 
doesn't mean the recipient will see it that way.


My signature text is black by default when composing a message 
like this one. Lighter when I view it.



I just discovered the solution for my request:
I have inserted in my HTML signature after the  first ""  part 
a style tag as you can see in the beginning of my HTML signature file:




 

   
   
 

<< rest of the html page >>

And the signature is not Lighter anymore.

I have found this info on this web page:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Signature_display_color


Great! But I don't see a signature in your post so can't tell if I 
would see it in black or lighter.


What do I do if it is black and annoys me because I want to see it 
lighter?



You cannot see nothing here because I did not insert a signature.
Effectively, you cannot see lighter. Without my modification ... ONLY 
Thunderbird,SeaMonkey and other mozilla mail readers see the 
signature lighter. Other mail readers see the signature in non-lighter.
Therefore with my modification ALL mail readers see the signature 
IDENTICALLY.
Are you interested that I send a mail, in your mailbox with my 
signature lighter and another with non-ligther ? Or did you prefer 
that i do it in the "mozilla.test" newsgroup ?


mozilla.test would be best.


Just done, normally you must see the difference.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey