Re: SM report as FF?

2019-12-19 Thread Ray Davison

David E. Ross wrote:

On 12/19/2019 9:57 AM, Ray Davison wrote:

Is there a cookbook for how to get SM to pretend it is FF.  B of A
complains and Chase blocks SM.

TY
Ray



Have you enabled "Advertise Firefox compatibility"?

1.  On the menu bar, select [Edit > Preferences].

2.  On the left side of the Preferences window, select [Advanced > HTTP
Networking].

3.  On the HTTP Networking pane, the checkbox for "Advertise Firefox
compatibility" should have a checkmark.  If it does not, select the
checkbox, which will create a checkmark.


It was already checked.

Ray


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Videa Downloading

2019-12-19 Thread Hartmut Figge
Daniel:

>I'm Dog-sitting for my sister's family whilst they visit the 'in-laws', 
>so I intend giving their Internet a pounding!!
>
>First action is to download a video from youtube.com but, looking at 
>https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-US/seamonkey/extensions/ there is no 
>Video downloader, or am I not looking right?? (reasonable as why would 
>TB [an e-mail agent] need a video downloader??)
>
>Or do I need to go back to the FireFox site??

Your distro should provide youtube-dl. Install it.

>Or .??
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tv_FRBRM0cg

Open a xterm. Make a directory and change into that. E.g. 'mkdir
tmp-down' and 'cd tmp-down'. Type youtube-dl followed by the above link.
Don't forget the 'Enter'. :)

That's all. I've just downloaded the file using youtube-dl in version
2019.11.28.

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Videa Downloading

2019-12-19 Thread Daniel
I'm Dog-sitting for my sister's family whilst they visit the 'in-laws', 
so I intend giving their Internet a pounding!!


First action is to download a video from youtube.com but, looking at 
https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-US/seamonkey/extensions/ there is no 
Video downloader, or am I not looking right?? (reasonable as why would 
TB [an e-mail agent] need a video downloader??)


Or do I need to go back to the FireFox site??

Or .??

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tv_FRBRM0cg

TIA

--
Daniel
Win7 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.5 Build identifier: 20190609032134


Linux User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread WaltS48

On 12/19/19 9:33 PM, Ant wrote:

On 12/19/2019 5:13 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
...
Really sorry for the multiple postings of this question. This list 
server didn't like my outgoing smtp and I'd tried a few times before I 
worked that out.


:-( Ken


Ken, I keep seeing these in this newsgroup:

"Subject: Request received: Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6 
ref:_00DU0Lfqj._5001v1CH3Uj:ref

Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 21:51:07 + (GMT)
From: Support TheFork 
Reply-To: supp...@thefork.com.au
To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org 


Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey
References: 
 



Hello ,

Thanks for your email. We have received your request 03913945 and it is 
being processed by our Support team.


To leave additional comments, please reply to this email.

Best,

TheFork team


TheFork, a TripAdvisor Company"


Can't you use your SeaMonkey's newsreader with news.mozilla.org usenet 
server to read and post instead of your list server? It's quite annoying 
now and cluttering the newsgroup each time you post on your list server. 
:-(


You can't create a filter to delete those posts from TheFork?

I did in my Thunderbird.

--
OS: Ubuntu Linux 18.04LTS - Gnome Desktop
https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/get-involved/

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread Ant

On 12/19/2019 1:47 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
...
You're welcome. Yeah, either downgrade or don't use Flash. I rarely 
see and use Flash anyways.

To confirm. I have v31 flash working but may web sites complain about it.


V32 b270 was the last one that worked for me in my Debian (Jessie) v8. 
https://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/installers/archive/fp_32.0.0.270_archive.zip 
should have it from 
https://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/archived-flash-player-versions.html. 


--
"The greatest enemies of ants are other ants, just as the greatest 
enemies of men are other men." --Auguste Forel
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
  / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread Ant

On 12/19/2019 5:13 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
...
Really sorry for the multiple postings of this question. This list 
server didn't like my outgoing smtp and I'd tried a few times before I 
worked that out.


:-( Ken


Ken, I keep seeing these in this newsgroup:

"Subject: Request received: Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6 
ref:_00DU0Lfqj._5001v1CH3Uj:ref

Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 21:51:07 + (GMT)
From: Support TheFork 
Reply-To: supp...@thefork.com.au
To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org 


Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey
References: 



Hello ,

Thanks for your email. We have received your request 03913945 and it is 
being processed by our Support team.


To leave additional comments, please reply to this email.

Best,

TheFork team


TheFork, a TripAdvisor Company"


Can't you use your SeaMonkey's newsreader with news.mozilla.org usenet 
server to read and post instead of your list server? It's quite annoying 
now and cluttering the newsgroup each time you post on your list server. :-(

--
"What is it going to be like in eternity with God? Frankly, the capacity 
of our brains cannot handle the wonder and greatness of heaven. It would 
be like trying to describe the Internet to an ant." --Rick Warren's 
book, The Purpose Driven Life
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
  / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM report as FF?

2019-12-19 Thread JAS

David E. Ross wrote:

On 12/19/2019 9:57 AM, Ray Davison wrote:

Is there a cookbook for how to get SM to pretend it is FF.  B of A
complains and Chase blocks SM.

TY
Ray



Have you enabled "Advertise Firefox compatibility"?

1.  On the menu bar, select [Edit > Preferences].

2.  On the left side of the Preferences window, select [Advanced > HTTP
Networking].

3.  On the HTTP Networking pane, the checkbox for "Advertise Firefox
compatibility" should have a checkmark.  If it does not, select the
checkbox, which will create a checkmark.

Is there a current site that has a list of the most current UA strings? 
I used to use http://www.useragentstring.com/pages/useragentstring.php 
but the site is either down or not current.

Thanks

JAS
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM report as FF?

2019-12-19 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl




David E. Ross wrote:

On 12/19/2019 9:57 AM, Ray Davison wrote:

Is there a cookbook for how to get SM to pretend it is FF.  B of A
complains and Chase blocks SM.

TY
Ray



Have you enabled "Advertise Firefox compatibility"?

1.  On the menu bar, select [Edit > Preferences].

2.  On the left side of the Preferences window, select [Advanced > HTTP
Networking].

3.  On the HTTP Networking pane, the checkbox for "Advertise Firefox
compatibility" should have a checkmark.  If it does not, select the
checkbox, which will create a checkmark.



Some things like the broken google search box sure ring a bell:

https://www.zdnet.com/article/vivaldi-to-change-user-agent-string-to-chrome-due-to-unfair-blocking/

FRG
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM report as FF?

2019-12-19 Thread David E. Ross
On 12/19/2019 9:57 AM, Ray Davison wrote:
> Is there a cookbook for how to get SM to pretend it is FF.  B of A 
> complains and Chase blocks SM.
> 
> TY
> Ray
> 

Have you enabled "Advertise Firefox compatibility"?

1.  On the menu bar, select [Edit > Preferences].

2.  On the left side of the Preferences window, select [Advanced > HTTP
Networking].

3.  On the HTTP Networking pane, the checkbox for "Advertise Firefox
compatibility" should have a checkmark.  If it does not, select the
checkbox, which will create a checkmark.

-- 
David E. Ross


Duracell batteries are prohibited in my house.
They leak and have severely damaged some expensive
electronics that I own.  Energizer and Eveready
batteries are okay.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread Ken Smith via support-seamonkey






Ant wrote:

On 12/19/2019 9:59 AM, Ken Smith wrote:

Your issue might be related since others and I can't get the last 
couple month's releases to work in our Linux boxes (mine is Debian 
v8 (Jessie)): https://tracker.adobe.com/#/view/FP-4199058, 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/flash-player/32-0-0-293-on-firefox-70-0-1-under-centos-7-7/td-p/10756098, 
and 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/flash-player/32-0-0-293-no-longer-works-on-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6/m-p/10753887. 
Adobe needs to fix it. :( 


Thank you Ant for your reply and link. That explains it perfectly. Of 
course many web sites moan about downlevel flash too so its a catch 22.


You're welcome. Yeah, either downgrade or don't use Flash. I rarely 
see and use Flash anyways.

To confirm. I have v31 flash working but may web sites complain about it.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Request received: Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6 ref:_00DU0Lfqj._5001v1CH3Uj:ref

2019-12-19 Thread Support TheFork via support-seamonkey
Hello ,

Thanks for your email. We have received your request 03913945 and it is being 
processed by our Support team.

To leave additional comments, please reply to this email.

Best,

TheFork team


TheFork, a TripAdvisor Company
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread Ant

On 12/19/2019 9:56 AM, EE wrote:

Ken Smith wrote:

Hi All,

I'm expecting/hoping that Flash Player should still work on Seamonkey 
2.29.5. I use the Adobe RPM repository to download it and I can see 
the files from the Adobe RPM in /usr/lib64/flash-player with 
appropriate links to there from the the /usr/lib64/seamonkey/plugins 
and other links to there related to the Firefox installation that's on 
the same machine. I've also tried a direct download of the Adobe 
.tar.gz build and the same issue persists.


But Flash does not show up in the plugins list in the Add-ons section 
in Seamonkey. (Also not in Firefox either)


The file command shows  "ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 
1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, stripped". Which looks OK.


I happen to have a libflashplayer.so from 2016, which if I swap that 
in place of the current one it does show up in the Add-ons section in 
both Seamonkey and Firefox together with a warning that its old, which 
it is.


If anyone has it working what does your config look like?

Any suggestions?

Many thanks

Ken


If you open the Addons list, there should be a section named "Plugins" 
and Flash should be in there.


FYI. His issue might be related since others and I can't get the last 
couple month's releases to work in our Linux boxes (mine is Debian v8 
(Jessie)): https://tracker.adobe.com/#/view/FP-4199058, 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/flash-player/32-0-0-293-on-firefox-70-0-1-under-centos-7-7/td-p/10756098, 
and 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/flash-player/32-0-0-293-no-longer-works-on-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6/m-p/10753887. 
Adobe needs to fix it. Mine doesn't show up in Firefox v7x and SeaMonkey 
v2.49.5. Older Flash versions from a couple months ago does so I have to 
use that. I rarely see and use Flash anyways.

--
"To the ant, a few drops of dew is a flood." --Iranian
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
  / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread Ant

On 12/19/2019 9:59 AM, Ken Smith wrote:

Your issue might be related since others and I can't get the last 
couple month's releases to work in our Linux boxes (mine is Debian v8 
(Jessie)): https://tracker.adobe.com/#/view/FP-4199058, 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/flash-player/32-0-0-293-on-firefox-70-0-1-under-centos-7-7/td-p/10756098, 
and 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/flash-player/32-0-0-293-no-longer-works-on-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6/m-p/10753887. 
Adobe needs to fix it. :( 


Thank you Ant for your reply and link. That explains it perfectly. Of 
course many web sites moan about downlevel flash too so its a catch 22.


You're welcome. Yeah, either downgrade or don't use Flash. I rarely see 
and use Flash anyways.

--
"Maybe it's like an ant hive..." "Bees man, bees have hives." "You know 
what I mean. It's like one female that runs the whole show." "Yes, the 
queen." "Yeah the mamma. She is bad*ss, man. I mean big." "These things 
ain't ants estupido." "I know that." --Aliens movie
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
  / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM report as FF?

2019-12-19 Thread David H. Durgee
Ray Davison wrote:
> Is there a cookbook for how to get SM to pretend it is FF.  B of A
> complains and Chase blocks SM.
> 
> TY
> Ray

Install PerfBar and customize its UA to match what you would like.  This
is how I handle it.  Others might add a UA override in preferences or
use another UA switcher.

Dave
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Request received: Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6 ref:_00DU0Lfqj._5001v1CH0DR:ref

2019-12-19 Thread Support TheFork via support-seamonkey
Hello ,

Thanks for your email. We have received your request 03913246 and it is being 
processed by our Support team.

To leave additional comments, please reply to this email.

Best,

TheFork team


TheFork, a TripAdvisor Company
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread Ken Smith via support-seamonkey









On 12/19/2019 5:13 AM, Ken Smith wrote:




Ken Smith via support-seamonkey wrote:

Hi All,

I'm expecting/hoping that Flash Player should still work on 
Seamonkey 2.29.5. I use the Adobe RPM repository to download it and 
I can see the files from the Adobe RPM in /usr/lib64/flash-player 
with appropriate links to there from the the 
/usr/lib64/seamonkey/plugins and other links to there related to the 
Firefox installation that's on the same machine. I've also tried a 
direct download of the Adobe .tar.gz build and the same issue persists.


But Flash does not show up in the plugins list in the Add-ons 
section in Seamonkey. (Also not in Firefox either)


The file command shows  "ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, 
version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, stripped". Which looks OK.


I happen to have a libflashplayer.so from 2016, which if I swap that 
in place of the current one it does show up in the Add-ons section 
in both Seamonkey and Firefox together with a warning that its old, 
which it is.


If anyone has it working what does your config look like?

Any suggestions?

Many thanks

Ken


Ant wrote:
Your issue might be related since others and I can't get the last 
couple month's releases to work in our Linux boxes (mine is Debian v8 
(Jessie)): https://tracker.adobe.com/#/view/FP-4199058, 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/flash-player/32-0-0-293-on-firefox-70-0-1-under-centos-7-7/td-p/10756098, 
and 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/flash-player/32-0-0-293-no-longer-works-on-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6/m-p/10753887. 
Adobe needs to fix it. :( 


Thank you Ant for your reply and link. That explains it perfectly. Of 
course many web sites moan about downlevel flash too so its a catch 22.


Once again apologies for the multiple posts to the list

Ken

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread EE

Ken Smith wrote:

Hi All,

I'm expecting/hoping that Flash Player should still work on Seamonkey 2.29.5. 
I use the Adobe RPM repository to download it and I can see the files from the 
Adobe RPM in /usr/lib64/flash-player with appropriate links to there from the 
the /usr/lib64/seamonkey/plugins and other links to there related to the 
Firefox installation that's on the same machine. I've also tried a direct 
download of the Adobe .tar.gz build and the same issue persists.


But Flash does not show up in the plugins list in the Add-ons section in 
Seamonkey. (Also not in Firefox either)


The file command shows  "ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 
(GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, stripped". Which looks OK.


I happen to have a libflashplayer.so from 2016, which if I swap that in place 
of the current one it does show up in the Add-ons section in both Seamonkey 
and Firefox together with a warning that its old, which it is.


If anyone has it working what does your config look like?

Any suggestions?

Many thanks

Ken


If you open the Addons list, there should be a section named "Plugins" and 
Flash should be in there.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SM report as FF?

2019-12-19 Thread Ray Davison
Is there a cookbook for how to get SM to pretend it is FF.  B of A 
complains and Chase blocks SM.


TY
Ray
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread Ant
Your issue might be related since others and I can't get the last couple 
month's releases to work in our Linux boxes (mine is Debian v8 
(Jessie)): https://tracker.adobe.com/#/view/FP-4199058, 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/flash-player/32-0-0-293-on-firefox-70-0-1-under-centos-7-7/td-p/10756098, 
and 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/flash-player/32-0-0-293-no-longer-works-on-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6/m-p/10753887. 
Adobe needs to fix it. :(



On 12/19/2019 5:13 AM, Ken Smith wrote:




Ken Smith via support-seamonkey wrote:

Hi All,

I'm expecting/hoping that Flash Player should still work on Seamonkey 
2.29.5. I use the Adobe RPM repository to download it and I can see 
the files from the Adobe RPM in /usr/lib64/flash-player with 
appropriate links to there from the the /usr/lib64/seamonkey/plugins 
and other links to there related to the Firefox installation that's on 
the same machine. I've also tried a direct download of the Adobe 
.tar.gz build and the same issue persists.


But Flash does not show up in the plugins list in the Add-ons section 
in Seamonkey. (Also not in Firefox either)


The file command shows  "ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 
1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, stripped". Which looks OK.


I happen to have a libflashplayer.so from 2016, which if I swap that 
in place of the current one it does show up in the Add-ons section in 
both Seamonkey and Firefox together with a warning that its old, which 
it is.


If anyone has it working what does your config look like?

Any suggestions?

Many thanks

Ken

--
"It's them!... Not THEM, the giant ants?!" --Girl and Crow
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see 
this signature correctly.

   /\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
  / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread WaltS48

On 12/19/19 1:39 AM, Ken Smith wrote:

Hi All,

I'm expecting/hoping that Flash Player should still work on Seamonkey 
2.29.5. I use the Adobe RPM repository to download it and I can see the 
files from the Adobe RPM in /usr/lib64/flash-player with appropriate 
links to there from the the /usr/lib64/seamonkey/plugins and other links 
to there related to the Firefox installation that's on the same machine. 
I've also tried a direct download of the Adobe .tar.gz build and the 
same issue persists.


But Flash does not show up in the plugins list in the Add-ons section in 
Seamonkey. (Also not in Firefox either)


The file command shows  "ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 
(GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, stripped". Which looks OK.


I happen to have a libflashplayer.so from 2016, which if I swap that in 
place of the current one it does show up in the Add-ons section in both 
Seamonkey and Firefox together with a warning that its old, which it is.


If anyone has it working what does your config look like?

Any suggestions?

Many thanks

Ken




On Ubuntu we install "flash-plugin installer" from Ubuntu. It updates 
when they get around to it and the current version of Flash in my 
SeaMonkey and Firefox browsers is 32.0.


--
OS: Ubuntu Linux 18.04LTS - Gnome Desktop
https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/get-involved/


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Request received: Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6 ref:_00DU0Lfqj._5001v1CGoww:ref

2019-12-19 Thread Support TheFork via support-seamonkey
Hello ,

Thanks for your email. We have received your request 03904501 and it is being 
processed by our Support team.

To leave additional comments, please reply to this email.

Best,

TheFork team


TheFork, a TripAdvisor Company
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread Ken Smith via support-seamonkey




Ken Smith via support-seamonkey wrote:

Hi All,

I'm expecting/hoping that Flash Player should still work on Seamonkey 
2.29.5. I use the Adobe RPM repository to download it and I can see 
the files from the Adobe RPM in /usr/lib64/flash-player with 
appropriate links to there from the the /usr/lib64/seamonkey/plugins 
and other links to there related to the Firefox installation that's on 
the same machine. I've also tried a direct download of the Adobe 
.tar.gz build and the same issue persists.


But Flash does not show up in the plugins list in the Add-ons section 
in Seamonkey. (Also not in Firefox either)


The file command shows  "ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 
1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, stripped". Which looks OK.


I happen to have a libflashplayer.so from 2016, which if I swap that 
in place of the current one it does show up in the Add-ons section in 
both Seamonkey and Firefox together with a warning that its old, which 
it is.


If anyone has it working what does your config look like?

Any suggestions?

Many thanks

Ken


Really sorry for the multiple postings of this question. This list 
server didn't like my outgoing smtp and I'd tried a few times before I 
worked that out.


:-( Ken

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread Ken Smith via support-seamonkey

Hi All,

I'm expecting/hoping that Flash Player should still work on Seamonkey 
2.29.5. I use the Adobe RPM repository to download it and I can see the 
files from the Adobe RPM in /usr/lib64/flash-player with appropriate 
links to there from the the /usr/lib64/seamonkey/plugins and other links 
to there related to the Firefox installation that's on the same machine. 
I've also tried a direct download of the Adobe .tar.gz build and the 
same issue persists.


But Flash does not show up in the plugins list in the Add-ons section in 
Seamonkey. (Also not in Firefox either)


The file command shows  "ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 
(GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, stripped". Which looks OK.


I happen to have a libflashplayer.so from 2016, which if I swap that in 
place of the current one it does show up in the Add-ons section in both 
Seamonkey and Firefox together with a warning that its old, which it is.


If anyone has it working what does your config look like?

Any suggestions?

Many thanks

Ken


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Request received: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6 ref:_00DU0Lfqj._5001v1CGoVb:ref

2019-12-19 Thread Support TheFork via support-seamonkey
Hello ,

Thanks for your email. We have received your request 03904433 and it is being 
processed by our Support team.

To leave additional comments, please reply to this email.

Best,

TheFork team


TheFork, a TripAdvisor Company
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread Ken Smith via support-seamonkey

Hi All,

I'm expecting/hoping that Flash Player should still work on Seamonkey 
2.29.5. I use the Adobe RPM repository to download it and I can see the 
files from the Adobe RPM in /usr/lib64/flash-player with appropriate 
links to there from the the /usr/lib64/seamonkey/plugins and other links 
to there related to the Firefox installation that's on the same machine. 
I've also tried a direct download of the Adobe .tar.gz build and the 
same issue persists.


But Flash does not show up in the plugins list in the Add-ons section in 
Seamonkey. (Also not in Firefox either)


The file command shows  "ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 
(GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, stripped". Which looks OK.


I happen to have a libflashplayer.so from 2016, which if I swap that in 
place of the current one it does show up in the Add-ons section in both 
Seamonkey and Firefox together with a warning that its old, which it is.


If anyone has it working what does your config look like?

Any suggestions?

Many thanks

Ken


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Request received: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6 ref:_00DU0Lfqj._5001v1CGoV7:ref

2019-12-19 Thread Support TheFork via support-seamonkey
Hello ,

Thanks for your email. We have received your request 03904429 and it is being 
processed by our Support team.

To leave additional comments, please reply to this email.

Best,

TheFork team


TheFork, a TripAdvisor Company
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Request received: Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6 ref:_00DU0Lfqj._5001v1CGoVM:ref

2019-12-19 Thread Support TheFork via support-seamonkey
Hello ,

Thanks for your email. We have received your request 03904432 and it is being 
processed by our Support team.

To leave additional comments, please reply to this email.

Best,

TheFork team


TheFork, a TripAdvisor Company
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Flash Plugin SM 2.49.5 x64 Centos 6

2019-12-19 Thread Ken Smith via support-seamonkey

Hi All,

I'm expecting/hoping that Flash Player should still work on Seamonkey 
2.29.5. I use the Adobe RPM repository to download it and I can see the 
files from the Adobe RPM in /usr/lib64/flash-player with appropriate 
links to there from the the /usr/lib64/seamonkey/plugins and other links 
to there related to the Firefox installation that's on the same machine. 
I've also tried a direct download of the Adobe .tar.gz build and the 
same issue persists.


But Flash does not show up in the plugins list in the Add-ons section in 
Seamonkey. (Also not in Firefox either)


The file command shows  "ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 
(GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, stripped". Which looks OK.


I happen to have a libflashplayer.so from 2016, which if I swap that in 
place of the current one it does show up in the Add-ons section in both 
Seamonkey and Firefox together with a warning that its old, which it is.


If anyone has it working what does your config look like?

Any suggestions?

Many thanks

Ken


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey