Re: Returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8

2010-01-08 Thread RGrannus

David Wilkinson wrote:

MikeyG wrote:

What would be the long term consequences be from returning to SeaMonkey
1.1.8, and continuing to use it until a user friendly Form Manager, as
user friendly as that of SeaMonkey 1.1.8, is available?


Death by a thousand (incompatibility) cuts :-).

For me the overriding reasons to go to SM2 (which I haven't done yet, except for
testing...) are

1. The FireFox 3 renderer

2. In the future, much better extension compatibility, due to greater
compatibility with FF/TB.



What is the FireFox 3 renderer?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8

2010-01-06 Thread MikeyG
What would be the long term consequences be from returning to SeaMonkey 
1.1.8, and continuing to use it until a user friendly Form Manager, as 
user friendly as that of SeaMonkey 1.1.8, is available?


Wouldn't security issues be addressed by programs such as, oh, ZoneAlarm 
Security Suite, let's say?


Would the 'bells and whistles' of SM 2, and it's future generations, be 
the only, aspect that would be missed out on?


MikeyG
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8

2010-01-06 Thread David Wilkinson
MikeyG wrote:
 What would be the long term consequences be from returning to SeaMonkey
 1.1.8, and continuing to use it until a user friendly Form Manager, as
 user friendly as that of SeaMonkey 1.1.8, is available?

Death by a thousand (incompatibility) cuts :-).

For me the overriding reasons to go to SM2 (which I haven't done yet, except for
testing...) are

1. The FireFox 3 renderer

2. In the future, much better extension compatibility, due to greater
compatibility with FF/TB.

-- 
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8

2010-01-06 Thread Martin Freitag

MikeyG schrieb:

What would be the long term consequences be from returning to SeaMonkey
1.1.8, and continuing to use it until a user friendly Form Manager, as
user friendly as that of SeaMonkey 1.1.8, is available?


Why don't you at last use 1.1.18 which is the most secure 1.1.x version...



Wouldn't security issues be addressed by programs such as, oh, ZoneAlarm
Security Suite, let's say?



Errr, maybe partially but that's all...

Martin
--
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - http://www.asciiribbon.org/index-de.html
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey