Re: SeaMonkey 2.36 broken
- Mensagem de zeroleft daning...@pop.com.br - Data: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:16:01 -0300 De: zeroleft daning...@pop.com.br Assunto: SeaMonkey 2.36 broken Para: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Just for the record, the beta builds of SeaMonkey for Linux i686, both in Adrian Kalla unofficial repository (https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-beta-linux32), as well in Mozilla Tinderbox (https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-linux), are currently broken ... At least one shared library (libmozalloc.so) is missing from the tarballs. Thank you for the hard work of all developers and good luck with this one! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.orghttps://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey - Final da mensagem de zeroleft daning...@pop.com.br - And, just as today, the unofficial beta builds in Adrian Kalla repository are working again ... Congratulations! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.36 broken
W dniu 06/24/2015 o 08:09 AM, zeroleft pisze: And, just as today, the unofficial beta builds in Adrian Kalla repository are working again ... Congratulations! They are working, because I did apply the patch for bug 1176599 manually. It is still not solved in the comm-beta repo itself, so e.g. tinderbox builds are still broken. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.36 broken
EE wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 06/21/2015 10:58 AM, Adrian Kalla wrote: W dniu 06/20/2015 o 12:58 AM, zeroleft pisze: I must confess that I am not capable of understand even half of what appears on this bug report = https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173683. Neither am I... But it seems something serious, at least with regard to SeaMonkey, with libmozalloc.so still absent in beta builds... Yes. And since I didn't find a bug for it, I filled a new one: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1176599 Are Tinderbox builds supposed to be usable. I don't see SeaMonkey 2.36b1 in Candidates, Nightly or Releases @ [Index of /pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey](http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/) SM 2.35 from Tinderbox is usable. I am using it. The only problem I had was YouTube insisting on sending videos as HTML5 rather than Flash. An extension fixed that. I tested SM 2.36. It will not run on Mac OS. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.36 broken
W dniu 06/21/2015 o 05:48 PM, WaltS48 pisze: Yes. And since I didn't find a bug for it, I filled a new one: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1176599 Are Tinderbox builds supposed to be usable. No, not necessarily. But I don't see what it does have to do with the above bug. Did I miss something? I don't see SeaMonkey 2.36b1 in Candidates, Nightly or Releases @ [Index of /pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey](http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/) You are right, there aren't any. But there are unofficial builds. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.36 broken
On 06/21/2015 10:58 AM, Adrian Kalla wrote: W dniu 06/20/2015 o 12:58 AM, zeroleft pisze: I must confess that I am not capable of understand even half of what appears on this bug report = https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173683. Neither am I... But it seems something serious, at least with regard to SeaMonkey, with libmozalloc.so still absent in beta builds... Yes. And since I didn't find a bug for it, I filled a new one: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1176599 Are Tinderbox builds supposed to be usable. I don't see SeaMonkey 2.36b1 in Candidates, Nightly or Releases @ [Index of /pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey](http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/) -- Kubuntu 15.04 | KDE 4.14.8 | Thunderbird 41.0a1(Daily) Go Bucs! [Coexist · Understanding Across Divides](https://www.coexist.org/) [Visit Pittsburgh](http://www.visitpittsburgh.com) [2015 EQT Pittsburgh Three Rivers Regatta](http://www.yougottaregatta.com/) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.36 broken
W dniu 06/20/2015 o 12:58 AM, zeroleft pisze: I must confess that I am not capable of understand even half of what appears on this bug report = https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173683. Neither am I... But it seems something serious, at least with regard to SeaMonkey, with libmozalloc.so still absent in beta builds... Yes. And since I didn't find a bug for it, I filled a new one: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1176599 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.36 broken
WaltS48 wrote: On 06/21/2015 10:58 AM, Adrian Kalla wrote: W dniu 06/20/2015 o 12:58 AM, zeroleft pisze: I must confess that I am not capable of understand even half of what appears on this bug report = https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173683. Neither am I... But it seems something serious, at least with regard to SeaMonkey, with libmozalloc.so still absent in beta builds... Yes. And since I didn't find a bug for it, I filled a new one: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1176599 Are Tinderbox builds supposed to be usable. I don't see SeaMonkey 2.36b1 in Candidates, Nightly or Releases @ [Index of /pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey](http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/) SM 2.35 from Tinderbox is usable. I am using it. The only problem I had was YouTube insisting on sending videos as HTML5 rather than Flash. An extension fixed that. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.36 broken
I must confess that I am not capable of understand even half of what appears on this bug report = https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173683. But it seems something serious, at least with regard to SeaMonkey, with libmozalloc.so still absent in beta builds... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.36 broken
W dniu 06/17/2015 o 11:16 AM, zeroleft pisze: At least one shared library (libmozalloc.so)is missing from the tarballs. Sounds like it has been caused by this: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173683 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SeaMonkey 2.36 broken
Just for the record, the beta builds of SeaMonkey for Linux i686, both inAdrian Kalla unofficial repository (https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-beta-linux32), as well in Mozilla Tinderbox (https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-linux), are currently broken ... At least one shared library (libmozalloc.so)is missing from the tarballs. Thank you for the hard work of all developers and good luck with this one! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
