Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-26 Thread Robert Kaiser

Henry schrieb:

The reason I didn't consider 2.0.6 is that usually when new versions
come out they are buggy and it takes awhile for the bugs to get worked out.


2.0.x are not new versions in that sense, they are just security and 
stability updates. They are the updates where bugs get actually worked out.
The next really new version in your sense will be 2.1, which currently 
is only available in Alpha-Previews.


Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread Henry
I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro 
SP2.


I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04.  Will 
that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first?


Thanks

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread Rob Lindauer

Henry wrote:

I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro SP2.

I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04. Will
that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first?

Thanks

Henry


I'd wait for more responses from people more knowledgeable than me, but...

No, you don't have to go thru Seamonkey 1.x to get to 2.x

I don't know how well Seamonkey will behave importing everything from 
your existing Mozilla installation, so my suggestion is carefully to 
back up your existing files (especially your bookmarks and email) first. 
 You can do so using Mozbackup (if you're on Windows) or manually.


You can then run the Seamonkey 2.x installation and see if it finds / 
migrates your files.  If it doesn't, you can get them from your backup 
(and your original Mozilla installation should still be there too, for 
that matter).


Personally, for such a major change, I have always done a completely new 
installation without migration, used Seamonkey to do basic new account 
setup (including email), and then copied my old mail folder contents 
(and bookmarks) into the new.  But that's just my method, which I 
realize won't work or is too complicated for many.


I presume you really mean the latest Seamonkey (2.0.6) rather than 
having some particular reason to go with 2.0.4.  But if you do want 
2.0.4 and have the install program, what I say above should work either way.


Regards, RL

--
Rob Lindauer - for my real address, replace att with sbc
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread Larry

Henry wrote:

I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro SP2.

I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04. Will
that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first?

Thanks

Henry
I recently upgraded to 2.0.4 from Netscape 7.2 (yes, it' still round!). 
It went flawlessly. Everything came through, including the Microsoft 
Favorites and address book (which I promptly deleted). Note that my 
profile was in the default location.


The one glitch I caused myself, by choosing use existing home page 
over use Seamonkey home page, thinking that my existing home page 
maybe hadn't converted (couldn't check at that point). It had, with no 
problem. Figured out what I'd done, fixed it, and have been delighted 
with SM.


Win XP SP2

Larry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/25/10 9:09 AM, Henry wrote:
 I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro 
 SP2.
 
 I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04.  Will 
 that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first?
 
 Thanks
 
 Henry

I believe you should choose a different directory for SeaMonkey itself
and a different directory for the profile.

-- 

David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread d...@kd4e.com

Have you considered updating to 2.0.6 while you are going
through the hassle?

 David E. Ross wrote:

On 7/25/10 9:09 AM, Henry wrote:

I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro
SP2.

I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04.  Will
that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first?

Thanks

Henry


I believe you should choose a different directory for SeaMonkey itself
and a different directory for the profile.



--

Thanks!  73, doc, KD4E
Communicators must defend free speech
or risk losing freedom entirely.
A Search Engine  More! http://yippy.com
|_|___|_|
| |  | |
   /\  {|
  /  \ {|
 /\{|
/   @  \   {|
|   |~_||
|   -| ||
\ # http://KD4E.com
Have an http://ultrafidian.com day!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread Henry
The reason I didn't consider 2.0.6 is that usually when new versions 
come out they are buggy and it takes awhile for the bugs to get worked 
out.


Henry


d...@kd4e.com wrote:


Have you considered updating to 2.0.6 while you are going
through the hassle?

  David E. Ross wrote:


On 7/25/10 9:09 AM, Henry wrote:


I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro
SP2.

I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04.  Will
that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first?

Thanks

Henry



I believe you should choose a different directory for SeaMonkey itself
and a different directory for the profile.




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread d...@kd4e.com

My understanding was it was a bug-fix and a security-update,
not really a new version.

Am I misunderstanding their numbering protocol?


The reason I didn't consider 2.0.6 is that usually when new versions
come out they are buggy and it takes awhile for the bugs to get worked out.

Henry


--

Thanks!  73, doc, KD4E
Communicators must defend free speech
or risk losing freedom entirely.
A Search Engine  More! http://yippy.com
|_|___|_|
| |  | |
   /\  {|
  /  \ {|
 /\{|
/   @  \   {|
|   |~_||
|   -| ||
\ # http://KD4E.com
Have an http://ultrafidian.com day!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/25/10 8:42 PM, Henry wrote:
 The reason I didn't consider 2.0.6 is that usually when new versions 
 come out they are buggy and it takes awhile for the bugs to get worked 
 out.
 
 Henry
 
 
 d...@kd4e.com wrote:
 
 Have you considered updating to 2.0.6 while you are going
 through the hassle?

   David E. Ross wrote:

 On 7/25/10 9:09 AM, Henry wrote:

 I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro
 SP2.

 I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04.  Will
 that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first?

 Thanks

 Henry


 I believe you should choose a different directory for SeaMonkey itself
 and a different directory for the profile.



There should be no new features.  This should be a stability and
security fix.  Stability means that some important bugs have been
fixed.  Security means that the developers concentrated on fixing bugs
that relate to being vulnerable to malware.

The next version with some new capabilities will likely be 2.1 (NOT
2.0.1).

-- 

David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread NoOp
On 07/25/2010 08:42 PM, Henry wrote:
 The reason I didn't consider 2.0.6 is that usually when new versions 
 come out they are buggy and it takes awhile for the bugs to get worked 
 out.

I suggest you reconsider:
http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/seamonkey20.html#seamonkey2.0.6
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey