Re: Very quiet in https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
> Looks like the 2.42 beta just got published for testing: > https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-beta-windows64/ Would someone please explain the difference between latest-comm-aurora-* latest-comm-beta-* latest-comm-central-* latest-comm-release-* Thanks, Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Very quiet in https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
On 09/02/2016 14:59, Lee wrote: Looks like the 2.42 beta just got published for testing: https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-beta-windows64/ Would someone please explain the difference between latest-comm-aurora-* latest-comm-beta-* latest-comm-central-* latest-comm-release-* Thanks, Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey Brilliant, thank you, just installed no problem. :) John ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Very quiet in https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
Adrian I just sent them to you via email. On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 21:49:47 +0100, Adrian Kalla wrote: >>W dniu 01/30/2016 o 10:51 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl pisze: >>> Mozilla changed a lot of stuff in the last two months. >>> >>> comm-aurora and comm-central builds are still broken by bug 1238428. My >>> local >>> Windows l10n builds did not succeed without private patches because of Chatzilla >>> and debugQA problems. >> >> >>What patches are that? Where can I find them to integrate them into my >>patch queue? ;) >> >>Best, >>Adrian >> >>P.S. Even after applying the patch for bug 1238428, c-a and c-c do not >>build... Even more patches needed :/ Regards Frank-Rainer Grahl ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Very quiet in https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
I use 32- and 64-bit version 2.41 parallel with modified useragent for Netflix, both works fine ... https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows32/seamonkey-2.41.en-US.win32.installer.exe https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/seamonkey-2.41.en-US.win64.installer.exe User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/44.0 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Very quiet in https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
W dniu 01/30/2016 o 10:51 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl pisze: > Mozilla changed a lot of stuff in the last two months. > > comm-aurora and comm-central builds are still broken by bug 1238428. My local > Windows l10n builds did not succeed without private patches because of > Chatzilla > and debugQA problems. What patches are that? Where can I find them to integrate them into my patch queue? ;) Best, Adrian P.S. Even after applying the patch for bug 1238428, c-a and c-c do not build... Even more patches needed :/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Very quiet in https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote: On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:47:13 +0100 (MEZ), "Frank-Rainer Grahl"wrote: I think the loaner was only used for Aurora and Central Windows builds. Ewong got a new one. On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 08:35:56 -0600, Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote: On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:51:28 +0100 (MEZ), "Frank-Rainer Grahl" wrote: Mozilla changed a lot of stuff in the last two months. comm-aurora and comm-central builds are still broken by bug 1238428. My local Windows l10n builds did not succeed without private patches because of Chatzilla and debugQA problems. I think until this is all sorted out we won't see many semiofficial builds. Didn't he also announce to cut back because of the latest Firefox announcements to abandon XUL? I can't find it right now. On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:38:02 -0600, Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote: Been playing with the local builds for a while but it seems to have gone dark. Saw some chatter here and there. Anyone know what's up? Regards Frank-Rainer Grahl After the fact I saw mention that the loaner build machine was decommissioned without notice. https://blog.mozilla.org/meeting-notes/archives/2316 Regards Frank-Rainer Grahl Not as quiet as I had first thought. A 2.41 was just built in the https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows32/ location. Testing it now. I've been running the 64 bit Seamonkey at https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-windows64/ for the past day. It runs wonderfully. much faster than any previous version I've been using. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey