Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic UHJ Discography Web Site is Down

2011-12-08 Thread Mark Anderson
Yes, I have everything, probably just need to clean out some old files and
picture images and then of course change URL links in the files. I am
checking out a domain name now and surprised how much has changed since I
last looked. Thanks for the offer I really appreciate the help. I will keep
you posted.

-Original Message-
From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu]
On Behalf Of Richard Elen
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 5:02 AM
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic UHJ Discography Web Site is Down

On 08/12/2011 02:25, Mark Anderson wrote:
> Always nice to hear from you. Thanks so much for the offer but I am really
> looking to keep the site as a whole since it offers more than my just my
> interest in ambi but also helps collectors of surround recordings with the
> research I have done. I certainly understand the separation as we do not
> need the dolby name contaminating such a fine site as ambisonic.net

Hi, Mark...

Well, I certainly understand the desire to keep it all together. So if 
you can't find a better way of doing it, I'll be happy to host the whole 
thing. Do the files exist?

Best,
--R

___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


Re: [Sursound] 64-bit VSTs?

2011-12-08 Thread dave . malham
I certainly _intend_ to (mine are all 64 bit internally, anyway) but I've 
so much on at the moment it's going to be a while before I can even think 
about it.


   Dave

On Dec 8 2011, Paul Hodges wrote:

Do any of those who have produced useful VSTs for Ambisonics have plans 
to compile 64-bit versions of them? I have now reached the point that 
half of my most-used audio programs are available in 64-bit versions, so 
it's starting to become relevant.


Paul




___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


[Sursound] 64-bit VSTs?

2011-12-08 Thread Paul Hodges
Do any of those who have produced useful VSTs for Ambisonics have plans to 
compile 64-bit versions of them?  I have now reached the point that half of 
my most-used audio programs are available in 64-bit versions, so it's 
starting to become relevant.


Paul

--
Paul Hodges


___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic UHJ Discography Web Site is Down

2011-12-08 Thread Richard Elen

On 08/12/2011 02:25, Mark Anderson wrote:

Always nice to hear from you. Thanks so much for the offer but I am really
looking to keep the site as a whole since it offers more than my just my
interest in ambi but also helps collectors of surround recordings with the
research I have done. I certainly understand the separation as we do not
need the dolby name contaminating such a fine site as ambisonic.net


Hi, Mark...

Well, I certainly understand the desire to keep it all together. So if 
you can't find a better way of doing it, I'll be happy to host the whole 
thing. Do the files exist?


Best,
--R

___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release: HTML5 test

2011-12-08 Thread mick ritchie

Hi Etienne
O

This is similar problem Ive always had with SoundofSpace AAC files  
which

use the
CLRLsRsLFE order but again I can use the Quad playback to fix the  
order.

Id much
prefer the ITU spec of LRCLFELsRs as that seems to be a sort of  
common

standard



I understand that AC3 and AAC have different channel orders by  
definition.
I'm pretty sure soundOfSpace does it correctly (for both). Are you  
talking
about Firefox in OSX with a VLC plugin? ... or are you talking  
about Safari

playing AAC natively?


I hadnt spotted a firefox vlc plugin so am using browsers natively -  
and they seem to follow my general audio prefs - having said that and  
upgrading firefox to v8 now i cant play my own ref movies at all -  
eek but it acts the same as v3.5.  Chrome I did try and it  
continually asks for plugins and shows me to too many google links  
for my liking.


The first aac file order spec seems to be what soundofspace uses but I
found much discussion online of using the more standard layout. AC3 has
to be as is because external devices are all set the same


It is ... I think what is needed is a table that identifies which 5.1
format for which browser for which OS for which stereo decode is  
best. Then

I'll implement that (and others can implement that)  and so people
could say "works with Chrome 10.1 + on windows, or  " etc.

Etienne


I'll have another look at the browsers as I need to get Firefox  
working again

and try a windows machine as Ive got some tests to do for binaural

mick


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound