Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-21 Thread Michael Chapman
 Has anyone tried  a system that was using the Z506 model for Logitech?

In 2007 I played with some Logitech X-140 speakers.
Was enough to convince me ambisonics works.
The spatialisation was actually very convincing.

http://mchapman.com/amb/hardware

Michael


___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-21 Thread Andy Furniss

Bearcat M. Şándor wrote:

Since we're talking about this, I've had my eye on Emotiva Stealth
8s http://www.emotivapro.com/products/stealth-8 . I assume they (or
the upcoming Stealth 88 which adds an additional 8 driver) would do
just fine for an ambisonic installation?

Now i just need to be able to afford 18 of those things..


:-) well if I were a millionaire the Genelec HT series look very nice.

More seriously, I did some time ago do a bit of searching about active
speakers just for home use. One possible issue could be back ported vs
front ported, your link looks like back ported, which could (so I have
read - no experience) have bass issues if placed close to walls.

Another thing I read albeit by an amateur reviewer about a specific
studio monitor, is that he said they wouldn't be much use for home hifi
use as the sweet spot was very narrow. Just one opinion about one
speaker of course, but something worth looking into. I have also read
the studio monitors are fine for home hifi use.
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-21 Thread Dave Malham
Actually, a square or rectangular  decoder's outputs are such that if all
four outputs are mixed together in equal amounts, the directional
components (X and Y) will cancel out automatically leaving just the W  -
which is generally what would be sent to the sub...

 Dave


On 21 October 2013 01:11, Marc Lavallée m...@hacklava.net wrote:

 Matthew Palmer palme...@mymail.vcu.edu a écrit :
  I'm wondering if it (4 sets of Logitechs) can give me 3d
  gratification for a little over $200. I know I'm definitely
  sacrificing quality but it will take me ages to save up for a proper
  set-up.
  I don't understand what kind of amplifier would be needed though.

 Yes! 4 small speakers with one sub are enough as a starting point:
 I suggest reading Localization in Horizontal-Only Ambisonic Systems :
 http://www.ai.sri.com/ajh/ambisonics/BLaH1.pdf

 Use a square or rectangular configuration, and drive the sub with the W
 ambisonic channel; you can use a multimedia 5.1 kit (with integrated
 amplifiers), but the sub should be driven separately, not by a mix of
 the 4 decoded speaker channels (that's my comprehension).
 For un-amplified speakers, you can use cheap D-class amps.

  I don't fully understand what cross-over frequency is (it sounds
  obvious though) but maybe by reducing the center channels from the
  set-up , I'd reduce the amount that is happening.

 I would not use the centre channel; there are experimental 5.1 decoders
 but I never tried. The cross-over frequency is between the sub-woofer
 and the satellites. Ambisonics works well at low frequencies in small
 rooms, at least down to the Schroeder frequency (usually around 150Hz,
 depending on your room size and acoustic treatment). That's why 300Hz
 is a bit high, but it's not catastrophic.

 Ambisonics with height is possible with a 3D7.1 configuration (using
 a 7.1 speaker kit). I yet have to try it.

 --
 Marc

  On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Charlie Richmond
  charlie@gmail.comwrote:
 
   On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Marc Lavallée m...@hacklava.net
   wrote:
  
   
What matters is rigidity; if a plastic enclosure is rigid
enough (for its size), then it would sound the same than a hard
wood enclosure.  In the specific case of the Z506 model from
Logitech, wooden enclosures for the satellites would make no
difference; the drivers, the amps, and the enclosures are too
small to shake. Only the sub-woofer enclosure is made of MDF, for
a reason.
   
So, why not using the Z506 5.1 kit from Logitech? Multimedia
speakers are primarily designed as computer accessories; some are
probably well made, excluding the one in the MoMA's permanent
collection (unless aesthetic is the most important criteria). I
wouldn't trust its sound quality; it's a bit small unless the
listening distance is less than 2 meters, the centre speaker does
not match the four other satellites, the centre speaker have 2
mids and the satellites have one mid and one tweeter, and the
cross-over frequency for the sub-woofer is probably near 300Hz,
which is a bit too high. For Ambisonics, I believe that better
quality full-range or coaxial speakers, all matched, should be
preferred.
   
I would only such use small multimedia speakers for a very compact
periphonic installation, along with 4 to 8 small sub-woofers for a
supplemental horizontal or periphonic low frequency decoder.
   
  
   Agreed.  That said, the Logitech self powered systems are generally
   extremely well made and sound very good, imho.
  
   C-)
   -- next part --
   An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
   URL: 
  
 https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131020/73b9a2d1/attachment.html
   
   ___
   Sursound mailing list
   Sursound@music.vt.edu
   https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
  
  -- next part --
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL:
  
 https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131020/2bfcc5f5/attachment.html
 
  ___ Sursound mailing list
  Sursound@music.vt.edu
  https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
 

 ___
 Sursound mailing list
 Sursound@music.vt.edu
 https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound




-- 
-- 
As of 1st October 2012, I have retired from the University.

These are my own views and may or may not be shared by the University

Dave Malham
Honorary Fellow, Department of Music
The University of York
York YO10 5DD
UK

'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131021/c9492ea9/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https

Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-21 Thread Matthew Palmer
.

 These are my own views and may or may not be shared by the University

 Dave Malham
 Honorary Fellow, Department of Music
 The University of York
 York YO10 5DD
 UK

 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131021/c9492ea9/attachment.html
 
 ___
 Sursound mailing list
 Sursound@music.vt.edu
 https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131021/9eff9504/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-21 Thread Matthew Palmer
  
 
  ___
  Sursound mailing list
  Sursound@music.vt.edu
  https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
 



 --
 --
 As of 1st October 2012, I have retired from the University.

 These are my own views and may or may not be shared by the University

 Dave Malham
 Honorary Fellow, Department of Music
 The University of York
 York YO10 5DD
 UK

 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131021/c9492ea9/attachment.html
 
 ___
 Sursound mailing list
 Sursound@music.vt.edu
 https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound



-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131021/96e7b750/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound