[Biofuel] REACH: Barely Alive and in Critical Condition

2006-12-15 Thread Keith Addison
 From Rachel's Precaution Reporter

REACH: Barely Alive and in Critical Condition
   Europe's long-awaited chemicals-policy law, REACH, survived a
   second reading today in the European Parliament. However, as enacted,
   REACH has been badly watered down and contains major loopholes,
   according a coalition of European health, environment, consumer and
   women's organizations.

EU Passes Sweeping Chemical Reform
   Compared to their European counterparts, U.S. activists are more
   enthusiastic about REACH, the chemicals-policy law adopted today by
   the European Parliament.

Greens: European Parliament Passes Weak Chemicals Policy
   The Greens and the European Free Alliance (EFA) immediately derided
   the European chemicals policy, REACH, enacted today by the European
   Parliament. Green Member of Parliament Caroline Lucas said, This deal
   is an early Christmas present for the chemicals industry...

European Union Approves Sweeping Chemicals Curbs
   The Wall Street Journal says, The tough new law will require
   manufacturers and importers to document how some 30,000 chemicals are
   used in products from cleaning liquids and plastics to furniture and
   electronics. About 1,500 chemicals deemed most dangerous to humans and
   animals will be at the heart of a new regulatory battleground for
   manufacturers and chemical producers doing business in or with the
   EU.

Europeans Pass Chemical Regulation Law
   The Houston Chronicle says, Some dangerous chemicals could be
   banned from the European market and about 30,000 substances used in
   everyday products ranging from detergents to toys will have to be
   registered in a central European Union database under a law approved
   Wednesday.

--

From: http://www.wecf.de/cms/articles/2006/12/3783.phpWomen in 
Europe for a Common Future, Dec. 13, 2006
http://www.precaution.org/lib/06/prn_reach_alive_not_kicking.061213.h 
tm[Printer-friendly version]

REACH: Barely Alive and in Critical Condition

Strasbourg, France -- A plenary vote by Members of the European 
Parliament has left the new EU chemicals legislation, REACH, alive 
but in a critical condition, according to health, environment, 
consumer and women's advocacy groups.

'Alive': The legislation, designed to replace rules up to 40 years 
old, sets Europe on the first modest step towards a new approach to 
chemicals regulation: companies will have to provide safety data for 
large volume chemicals that they produce or import into Europe, and 
there is a mechanism for the substitution of persistent and 
bioaccumulative chemicals if safer alternatives exist. It also allows 
the public to request information about the presence of a limited 
number of hazardous chemicals in products. In the past, companies 
could sell almost any chemical they liked without providing health 
and safety information; and hazardous chemicals were only restricted 
in response to scandal on a case-by-case basis.

'Not kicking': Major loopholes in REACH will still allow many 
chemicals that can cause serious health problems, including cancer, 
birth defects and reproductive illnesses, to continue being used in 
manufacturing and consumer goods. Further concessions exempt 
companies which import and manufacture chemicals in volumes below 10 
tonnes a year -- 60% of chemicals covered by REACH -- from the 
requirement to provide any meaningful safety data.

REACH and the new European Chemicals Agency will therefore require 
intensive care from policymakers over the coming years to ensure that 
they protect the public from highly hazardous chemicals.

Under REACH, many 'high-concern' chemicals will be allowed onto the 
market if producers claim that they can 'adequately control' them. 
The approach of adequate control -- and safe thresholds -- is 
premised on a risky gamble, given the unknown effects of chemicals in 
combination, on vulnerable hormone functions, and on the development 
of children from the earliest stages of life. Medical associations, 
consumer groups and innovative businesses across Europe had called 
for a complete substitution requirement in REACH as the minimum 
necessary measure against hazardous chemicals.

The loopholes and provisions for self-regulation contained in these 
measures leave REACH very vulnerable to further manipulation by the 
chemical industry. There is no guarantee, for example, that 
information from third parties about safer alternatives to hazardous 
chemicals will be considered in every case.

The new EU Chemicals Agency in Helsinki will have to be closely 
monitored to ensure that REACH can deliver. Without the necessary 
support, hazardous chemicals will continue to contaminate wildlife, 
our homes and our bodies, and REACH will prove a failure.

http://www.wecf.de/cms/projects/reach/index.phpMore information.

Contacts:

Mecki Naschke, Policy Officer, Chemical Policies at European 
Environmental Bureau (EEB), +49 176 23 500 897

Javier Calvo, Policy Officer at 

[Biofuel] The Repeatedly Re-Elected Autocrat

2006-12-15 Thread Keith Addison
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3009
Extra! November/December 2006

The Repeatedly Re-Elected Autocrat
Painting Chávez as a 'would-be dictator'

By Steve Rendall

Hugo Chávez never had a chance with the U.S. press. Shortly after his 
first electoral victory in 1998, New York Times Latin America 
reporter Larry Rohter (12/20/98) summed up his victory thusly:

All across Latin America, presidents and party leaders are looking 
over their shoulders. With his landslide victory in Venezuela's 
presidential election on December 6, Hugo Chávez has revived an 
all-too-familiar specter that the region's ruling elite thought they 
had safely interred: that of the populist demagogue, the 
authoritarian man on horseback known as the caudillo.

Notwithstanding that interring caudillos has not been a consuming 
passion of Latin America's ruling elite (or U.S. policy makers), it 
is fitting that the Times reporter sided with that elite. A few years 
later, in April 2002, following Chávez's re-election by an even 
greater margin, Times editors cheered a coup against Chávez by 
Venezuelan elites (Extra! Update, 6/02), declaring in Orwellian 
fashion that thanks to the overthrow of the elected president, 
Venezuelan democracy is no longer threatened by a would-be dictator.

For Pedro Carmona-the man who took power in Chávez's brief absence, 
declaring an actual dictatorship by dismissing the Venezuelan 
legislature, Supreme Court and other democratic institutions-Times 
editors had much nicer language, calling the former head of 
Venezuela's chamber of commerce a respected business leader.

Following Chávez's return to office a few days later, Times editors 
issued a grudging reappraisal of their coup endorsement (Extra! 
Update!, 6/02). Still insisting that Chávez was a divisive and 
demagogic leader, the editors averred that the forcible removal of a 
democratically elected leader is never something to cheer.

As if this pro-opposition bias were not enough, in January 2003 the 
Times was forced to dismiss one of its Venezuela reporters, a 
Venezuelan national named Francisco Toro, when it was revealed that 
Toro was an anti-Chávez activist (FAIR Action Alert, 6/6/03).

The Times anti-Chávez campaign was manifest in a recent book review 
(9/17/06) of Nikolas Kozloff's Hugo Chávez: Oil, Politics and the 
Challenge to the United States, in which Times business columnist 
Roger Lowenstein rebuked the author for praising the Chávez 
government, explaining that Chávez has militarized the government, 
emasculated the country's courts, intimidated the media, eroded 
confidence in the economy and hollowed out Venezuela's 
once-democratic institutions. But Lowenstein failed to provide much 
evidence for his charges-a frequent characteristic of Chávez 
bashing-or to note that similar charges can be made against other 
governments, including one much closer to home.

Calling names
The New York Times is not alone. A Newsweek column (11/7/05) asserted 
that Venezuela has turned to destructive populism under Chávez, 
while a news report in the magazine (10/31/05) cited the 
increasingly authoritarian tilt of the Chávez regime, which has 
packed the Venezuelan judiciary with pliable magistrates and enacted 
legislation curtailing press freedoms. In his May 2006 Atlantic 
profile, New Republic editor Franklin Foer complained that under 
Chávez's presidency Venezuela had taken an anti-democratic turn.

The Washington Post's news pages have relentlessly criticized Chávez 
in news stories, calling him autocratic (8/12/04) and 
authoritarian (8/7/06). However, a much more ferocious campaign is 
waged against Chávez on the Post's editorial and op-ed pages. In one 
column after another, the Post's opinion pages have charged him with 
assaulting democracy and stifling dissent. In one column (10/16/06), 
deputy editorial editor Jackson Diehl called Chávez an autocratic 
demagogue and accused him of dismantl[ing] Venezuela's democracy. 
Editorial page editor Fred Hiatt (12/26/05) explained that Chávez had 
consolidated one-party rule and moved to export his brand of 
populist autocracy to neighboring nations.

Even putative liberal commentators have joined the media chorus. On 
the O'Reilly Factor (12/5/05), Fox News contributor and NPR reporter 
Juan Williams said of Venezuela, What you're seeing there is really 
communism. In September, when Democratic operatives Paul Begala and 
James Carville appeared on New York City public radio station WNYC 
(9/25/06), Begala told host Brian Lehrer that Chávez was an 
autocrat, not a democrat, and said he had a terrible human rights 
record. Carville told Lehrer, I've worked in Venezuela and I would 
be very reluctant to call Chávez a democrat. What Carville didn't 
say was that he worked in Venezuela as an advisor to Venezuelan 
opposition groups leading an economically devastating strike by 
managers of the national oil company in an effort to destabilize the 
government (Washington Post, 1/20/03).


Re: [Biofuel] oil pulling

2006-12-15 Thread Keith Addison
It's called a Herxheimer reaction (aka Herxheimer's revenge). Eg, 
medical treatment can destroy a pathogen, releasing endotoxins which 
make you even more ill than you were before, and overwhelm the liver. 
(Endotoxins are part of the pathogen's body, only released when it 
dies, as opposed to the exotoxins that it excretes.) I think there 
are other ways this can happen, it depends on the illness.

Best

Keith


Luke:

Have you ever noticed that when washing a bucket, the water gets 
dirty before it gets clean. If only a portion of the bucket is 
dirty, when you clean it you get the rest of the bucket dirty before 
it gets clean.  For a more comprehensive understanding you could 
probably google healing crisis
I have recently started trying the oil pulling method and I think it 
is beneficial.  I think it was either at a DMSO list or perhaps 
Whitegold list it was posted as well.

Wes



Luke wrote:

Luke Hansen
Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:51:15 -0800

I'm always a little skeptical of miracle cures that
tell you that getting sicker is a step towards getting
better ;P


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] TiO2 (Titanium Dioxide) Lights

2006-12-15 Thread Joe Street
Yes ozone is a sterilizer and it is also unhealthy to breathe.  High 
voltage arcs produce ozone and also produce nitrogen oxides which are 
not healthy. Mercury arc lamps produce enough UV to make ozone for sure. 
So does a laser printer. Usually arc lamps have an outer envelope to 
keep air away from the actual bulb.  UV lamps bright enough to make O3 
are dangerous to the eyes.  What else about ozonelet's see, ozone 
disolved in hot deionized water is hell on wheels for anything organic. 
Works like gang busters as a cleaner for semiconductor wafers. 
Environmentally freindly! Liquid ozone is something like nitroglycerine, 
watch out for that one when using cryogenic pumps with oxygen plasmas. 
Warm them slowly with a nitrogen purgedon't let that ball of frozen 
ozone melt and drip or we'll see you in the next world.  I suppose 
liquid ozone would beat liquid oxygen for starting a barbeque...lol  
Don't try this at home kids.


Fun with ozone
Joe

Jeromie Reeves wrote:

UV light (when powerful enough) can sterilize many things. There are a 
number of water plants that use UV for
sterilizing. I dunno about the Ozone Lights doing much good on the O3 
side (namely, is O3 a sterilizing agent?).
I think there are better ways to make O3 such as direct electrical arc 
(jacobs ladder). Some ion machines also

produce O3.

Luke Hansen wrote:

 


Hello all,

I was just wondering if anyone has heard anything
about the effects of these Ozone Lights. I guess
that they don't actually create O3, but they do kill
airborne pathogens. Most of the online literature that
I've found goes back to one study that showed this
light effective in killing E. Coli bacteria in
clinical trials. Anyone have experiences with this, or
anything similiar?

Thanks,
Luke




Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




   




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


 

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] SENATE CONTROL THREATENED BY TIM JOHNSON'S ILLNESS

2006-12-15 Thread Joe Street
So I'm curios what folks here think Raoul may do when Fidel dies, and 
what the US will do? Apparently Raoul is pro-china. Guess these 
questions are so inter-related it's anyones guess.

Joe

Luke Hansen wrote:
snip



 Bummer about Johnson, but hell, be thankful...Hugo Chavez was 
 re-elected, and Pinochet kicked the bucket. It's kinda scary how 
 malleable people seem to be...he was actually reveared by a section of 
 Chile's population...and to think that the CIA put him in control to 
 stop the spread of communism to south america...crazy shit.



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] SENATE CONTROL THREATENED BY TIM JOHNSON'S ILLNESS

2006-12-15 Thread Paul S Cantrell

Hopefully Bush won't 'pull a Teddy Roosevelt' and invade.  Cuba does have
oil.

Although, the US could use some competent doctors that speak Spanish.


On 12/15/06, Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


So I'm curios what folks here think Raoul may do when Fidel dies, and
what the US will do? Apparently Raoul is pro-china. Guess these
questions are so inter-related it's anyones guess.

Joe




--
Thanks,
PC

He's the kind of a guy who lights up a room just by flicking a switch

It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it. - Steven Wright

We are confronted with insurmountable opportunities. - Walt Kelly
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] TiO2 (Titanium Dioxide) Lights

2006-12-15 Thread Luke Hansen
Excellent. I appreciate all of the input. In the past, I've used UV sterylizers 
in my marine aquaria, but never really had a need for indoor air purification. 
Now I do, so I'm examining my options. First a few points/questions...

* very high voltages are required to create O3, correct?
* UV light between certain nanometers creates O3?
* This ozone light could also be harmful to people, as well as eliminating 
airborne pathogens?

A side note, I think that the ozone light brags about its safety, and, in fact, 
states that it doesn't actually create O3.

Thanks,
Luke

Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Yes ozone is a sterilizer and 
it is also unhealthy to breathe.  High voltage arcs produce ozone and also 
produce nitrogen oxides which are not healthy. Mercury arc lamps produce enough 
UV to make ozone for sure. So does a laser printer. Usually arc lamps have an 
outer envelope to keep air away from the actual bulb.  UV lamps bright enough 
to make O3 are dangerous to the eyes.  What else about ozonelet's see, 
ozone disolved in hot deionized water is hell on wheels for anything organic. 
Works like gang busters as a cleaner for semiconductor wafers. Environmentally 
freindly! Liquid ozone is something like nitroglycerine, watch out for that one 
when using cryogenic pumps with oxygen plasmas. Warm them slowly with a 
nitrogen purgedon't let that ball of frozen ozone melt and drip or we'll 
see you in the next world.  I suppose liquid ozone would beat liquid oxygen for 
starting a barbeque...lol  Don't try this at
 home kids.
 
 Fun with ozone
 Joe
 
 Jeromie Reeves wrote:

UV light (when powerful enough) can sterilize many things. There are a 
number of water plants that use UV for
sterilizing. I dunno about the Ozone Lights doing much good on the O3 
side (namely, is O3 a sterilizing agent?).
I think there are better ways to make O3 such as direct electrical arc 
(jacobs ladder). Some ion machines also
produce O3.

Luke Hansen wrote:

  

Hello all,

I was just wondering if anyone has heard anything
about the effects of these Ozone Lights. I guess
that they don't actually create O3, but they do kill
airborne pathogens. Most of the online literature that
I've found goes back to one study that showed this
light effective in killing E. Coli bacteria in
clinical trials. Anyone have experiences with this, or
anything similiar?

Thanks,
Luke




Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org  
Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html  Search 
the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): 
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/  
  
  ___ Biofuel mailing list 
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org  
Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html  Search 
the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): 
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ 
  ___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com ___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] oil pulling

2006-12-15 Thread Luke Hansen
Well, in light of the barrage of rebuttals that I've received here, I suppose 
that I may have to actually try this Oil Pulling trick. I realize now that it's 
a bit hypocritical of me to consider so many of my fellow countrymen 
closeminded, if I'm not open to new things myself!



Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's called a Herxheimer reaction (aka 
Herxheimer's revenge). Eg, 
medical treatment can destroy a pathogen, releasing endotoxins which 
make you even more ill than you were before, and overwhelm the liver. 
(Endotoxins are part of the pathogen's body, only released when it 
dies, as opposed to the exotoxins that it excretes.) I think there 
are other ways this can happen, it depends on the illness.

Best

Keith


Luke:

Have you ever noticed that when washing a bucket, the water gets 
dirty before it gets clean. If only a portion of the bucket is 
dirty, when you clean it you get the rest of the bucket dirty before 
it gets clean.  For a more comprehensive understanding you could 
probably google healing crisis
I have recently started trying the oil pulling method and I think it 
is beneficial.  I think it was either at a DMSO list or perhaps 
Whitegold list it was posted as well.

Wes



Luke wrote:

Luke Hansen
Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:51:15 -0800

I'm always a little skeptical of miracle cures that
tell you that getting sicker is a step towards getting
better ;P


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com ___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] TiO2 (Titanium Dioxide) Lights

2006-12-15 Thread Joe Street

Hi Luke;

What is required to create ozone electrically is an arc open to air.  
The voltage required for this depends on the distance between electrodes 
or 'air gap' small gap requires lower voltage.  Another way is to have a 
very high voltage which produces a corona.  This is not quite like an 
arc but does cause local ionization of the air around the tip of the 
sharp electrode.


Yes UV light can produce ozone (O3) I cannot remember which wavelength 
but a mercury arc lamp produces several spectral peaks and one of them 
causes ozone formation.


Yes the high intensity UV light can cause burns to the skin and eyes.  
As well the ozone is toxic to breathe.  On your last comment I am 
confused.  You realize ozone and O3 are the same thing?  If the lamp 
claims to produce ozone then it is producing O3. If it claims not to 
produce O3 then it cannot be called an ozone lamp!


J

Luke Hansen wrote:

Excellent. I appreciate all of the input. In the past, I've used UV 
sterylizers in my marine aquaria, but never really had a need for 
indoor air purification. Now I do, so I'm examining my options. First 
a few points/questions...


* very high voltages are required to create O3, correct?
* UV light between certain nanometers creates O3?
* This ozone light could also be harmful to people, as well as 
eliminating airborne pathogens?


A side note, I think that the ozone light brags about its safety, and, 
in fact, states that it doesn't actually create O3.


Thanks,
Luke

*/Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:

Yes ozone is a sterilizer and it is also unhealthy to breathe. 
High voltage arcs produce ozone and also produce nitrogen oxides

which are not healthy. Mercury arc lamps produce enough UV to make
ozone for sure. So does a laser printer. Usually arc lamps have an
outer envelope to keep air away from the actual bulb.  UV lamps
bright enough to make O3 are dangerous to the eyes.  What else
about ozonelet's see, ozone disolved in hot deionized water is
hell on wheels for anything organic. Works like gang busters as a
cleaner for semiconductor wafers. Environmentally freindly! Liquid
ozone is something like nitroglycerine, watch out for that one
when using cryogenic pumps with oxygen plasmas. Warm them slowly
with a nitrogen purgedon't let that ball of frozen ozone melt
and drip or we'll see you in the next world.  I suppose liquid
ozone would beat liquid oxygen for starting a barbeque...lol 
Don't try this at home kids.


Fun with ozone
Joe

Jeromie Reeves wrote:

UV light (when powerful enough) can sterilize many things. There are a 
number of water plants that use UV for
sterilizing. I dunno about the Ozone Lights doing much good on the O3 
side (namely, is O3 a sterilizing agent?).
I think there are better ways to make O3 such as direct electrical arc 
(jacobs ladder). Some ion machines also

produce O3.

Luke Hansen wrote:

 


Hello all,

I was just wondering if anyone has heard anything
about the effects of these Ozone Lights. I guess
that they don't actually create O3, but they do kill
airborne pathogens. Most of the online literature that
I've found goes back to one study that showed this
light effective in killing E. Coli bacteria in
clinical trials. Anyone have experiences with this, or
anything
similiar?

Thanks,
Luke




Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org  Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/  

 ___ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org  Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: [Biofuel] TiO2 (Titanium Dioxide) Lights

2006-12-15 Thread Kirk McLoren
Its the short uv that produces ozone
  275nm?
  You need the mercury vapor lamps that are made of quartz.
  Glass is opaque to uv.
   
  Kirk

Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Luke;

What is required to create ozone electrically is an arc open to air.  The 
voltage required for this depends on the distance between electrodes or 'air 
gap' small gap requires lower voltage.  Another way is to have a very high 
voltage which produces a corona.  This is not quite like an arc but does cause 
local ionization of the air around the tip of the sharp electrode. 

Yes UV light can produce ozone (O3) I cannot remember which wavelength but a 
mercury arc lamp produces several spectral peaks and one of them causes ozone 
formation. 

Yes the high intensity UV light can cause burns to the skin and eyes.  As well 
the ozone is toxic to breathe.  On your last comment I am confused.  You 
realize ozone and O3 are the same thing?  If the lamp claims to produce ozone 
then it is producing O3. If it claims not to produce O3 then it cannot be 
called an ozone lamp!

J

Luke Hansen wrote:
  Excellent. I appreciate all of the input. In the past, I've used UV 
sterylizers in my marine aquaria, but never really had a need for indoor air 
purification. Now I do, so I'm examining my options. First a few 
points/questions...

* very high voltages are required to create O3, correct?
* UV light between certain nanometers creates O3?
* This ozone light could also be harmful to people, as well as eliminating 
airborne pathogens?

A side note, I think that the ozone light brags about its safety, and, in fact, 
states that it doesn't actually create O3.

Thanks,
Luke

Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Yes ozone is a sterilizer and it is 
also unhealthy to breathe.  High voltage arcs produce ozone and also produce 
nitrogen oxides which are not healthy. Mercury arc lamps produce enough UV to 
make ozone for sure. So does a laser printer. Usually arc lamps have an outer 
envelope to keep air away from the actual bulb.  UV lamps bright enough to make 
O3 are dangerous to the eyes.  What else about ozonelet's see, ozone 
disolved in hot deionized water is hell on wheels for anything organic. Works 
like gang busters as a cleaner for semiconductor wafers. Environmentally 
freindly! Liquid ozone is something like nitroglycerine, watch out for that one 
when using cryogenic pumps with oxygen plasmas. Warm them slowly with a 
nitrogen purgedon't let that ball of frozen ozone melt and drip or we'll 
see you in the next world.  I suppose liquid ozone would beat liquid oxygen for 
starting a barbeque...lol  Don't try this at home kids.

Fun with ozone
Joe

Jeromie Reeves wrote:
  
UV light (when powerful enough) can sterilize many things. There are a   number 
of water plants that use UV for  sterilizing. I dunno about the Ozone Lights 
doing much good on the O3   side (namely, is O3 a sterilizing agent?).  I think 
there are better ways to make O3 such as direct electrical arc   (jacobs 
ladder). Some ion machines also  produce O3.Luke Hansen wrote:  
  
Hello all,I was just wondering if anyone has heard anything  about the 
effects of these Ozone Lights. I guess  that they don't actually create O3, 
but they do kill  airborne pathogens. Most of the online literature that  I've 
found goes back to one study that showed this  light effective in killing E. 
Coli bacteria in  clinical trials. Anyone have experiences with this, or  
anything   similiar?Thanks,  Luke

  Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it 
now.___  Biofuel mailing list  
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org  
Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html  Search 
the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): 
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/  

  ___ Biofuel mailing list 
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org  
Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html  Search 
the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): 
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


  __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam 

[Biofuel] Diabetes breakthrough: Toronto scientists cure disease in mice

2006-12-15 Thread Kirk McLoren


  
  st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }  Interesting: While 
pain scientists have been receptive to the research, immunologists have voiced 
skepticism at the idea of the nervous system playing such a major role in the 
disease.   -D



  st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }Diabetes 
breakthrough: Toronto scientists cure disease in mice; claim malfunctioning 
nerve cells the cause…
  
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=a042812e-492c-4f07-8245-8a598ab5d1bfk=63970p=2
   
  Published: Friday, December 15, 2006 
   
  In a discovery that has stunned even those behind it, scientists at a Toronto 
hospital say they have proof the body's nervous system helps trigger diabetes, 
opening the door to a potential near-cure of the disease that affects millions 
of Canadians.
   
  Diabetic mice became healthy virtually overnight after researchers injected a 
substance to counteract the effect of malfunctioning pain neurons in the 
pancreas.
   
  I couldn't believe it, said Dr. Michael Salter, a pain expert at the 
Hospital for Sick Children and one of the scientists. Mice with diabetes 
suddenly didn't have diabetes any more.
   
  The researchers caution they have yet to confirm their findings in people, 
but say they expect results from human studies within a year or so. Any 
treatment that may emerge to help at least some patients would likely be years 
away from hitting the market.
  
  But the excitement of the team from Sick Kids, whose work is being published 
today in the journal Cell, is almost palpable.
   
  I've never seen anything like it, said Dr. Hans Michael Dosch, an 
immunologist at the hospital and a leader of the studies. In my career, this 
is unique.
   
  Their conclusions upset conventional wisdom that Type 1 diabetes, the most 
serious form of the illness that typically first appears in childhood, was 
solely caused by auto-immune responses -- the body's immune system turning on 
itself.
   
  They also conclude that there are far more similarities than previously 
thought between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and that nerves likely play a role 
in other chronic inflammatory conditions, such as asthma and Crohn's disease.
   
  The paradigm-changing study opens a novel, exciting door to address one of 
the diseases with large societal impact, said Dr. Christian Stohler, a leading 
U.S. pain specialist and dean of dentistry at the University of Maryland, who 
has reviewed the work.
   
  The treatment and diagnosis of neuropathic diseases is poised to take a 
dramatic leap forward because of the impressive research.
   
  About two million Canadians suffer from diabetes, 10% of them with Type 1, 
contributing to 41,000 deaths a year.
   
  Insulin replacement therapy is the only treatment of Type 1, and cannot 
prevent many of the side effects, from heart attacks to kidney failure.
   
  In Type 1 diabetes, the pancreas does not produce enough insulin to shift 
glucose into the cells that need it. In Type 2 diabetes, the insulin that is 
produced is not used effectively -- something called insulin resistance -- also 
resulting in poor absorption of glucose.
   
  The problems stem partly from inflammation -- and eventual death -- of 
insulin-producing islet cells in the pancreas.
   
  Dr. Dosch had concluded in a 1999 paper that there were surprising 
similarities between diabetes and multiple sclerosis, a central nervous system 
disease. His interest was also piqued by the presence around the 
insulin-producing islets of an enormous number of nerves, pain neurons 
primarily used to signal the brain that tissue has been damaged.
   
  Suspecting a link between the nerves and diabetes, he and Dr. Salter used an 
old experimental trick -- injecting capsaicin, the active ingredient in hot 
chili peppers, to kill the pancreatic sensory nerves in mice that had an 
equivalent of Type 1 diabetes.
   
  Then we had the biggest shock of our lives, Dr. Dosch said. Almost 
immediately, the islets began producing insulin normally It was a shock ? 
really out of left field, because nothing in the literature was saying anything 
about this.
   
  It turns out the nerves secrete neuropeptides that are instrumental in the 
proper functioning of the islets. Further study by the team, which also 
involved the University of Calgary and the Jackson Laboratory in Maine, found 
that the nerves in diabetic mice were releasing too little of the 
neuropeptides, resulting in a vicious cycle of stress on the islets.
   
  So next they injected the neuropeptide substance P in the pancreases of 
diabetic mice, a demanding task given the tiny size of the rodent organs. The 
results were dramatic.
   
  The islet inflammation cleared up and the diabetes was gone. Some have 
remained in that state for as long as four months, with just one injection.
   
  They also discovered that their treatments curbed the insulin 

Re: [Biofuel] TiO2 (Titanium Dioxide) Lights

2006-12-15 Thread Luke Hansen
I think that the company that makes these lights just chose Ozone Light 
because it sounded cool to them. Has nothing to do with creation of O3. 

Kirk, What do you mean by opaque? Do you mean that none or some of the UV 
goes through the glass?

And quartz? wouldn't that manufacturing proscess be very expensive...resulting 
in really high retail prices?



Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its the short uv that produces ozone
  275nm?
  You need the mercury vapor lamps that are made of quartz.
  Glass is opaque to uv.
   
  Kirk

Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Luke;

What is required to create ozone electrically is an arc open to air.  The 
voltage required for this depends on the distance between electrodes or 'air 
gap' small gap requires lower voltage.  Another way is to have a very high 
voltage which produces a corona.  This is not quite like an arc but does cause 
local ionization of the air around the tip of the sharp electrode. 

Yes UV light can produce ozone (O3) I cannot remember which wavelength but a 
mercury arc lamp produces several spectral peaks and one of them causes ozone 
formation. 

Yes the high  intensity UV light can cause burns to the skin and eyes.  As well 
the ozone is toxic to breathe.  On your last comment I am confused.  You 
realize ozone and O3 are the same thing?  If the lamp claims to produce ozone 
then it is producing O3. If it claims not to produce O3 then it cannot be 
called an ozone lamp!

J

Luke Hansen wrote:
  Excellent. I appreciate all of the input. In the past, I've used UV 
sterylizers in my marine aquaria, but never really had a need for indoor air 
purification. Now I do, so I'm examining my options. First a few 
points/questions...

* very high voltages are required to create O3, correct?
* UV light between certain nanometers creates O3?
* This ozone light could also be harmful to people, as well as eliminating 
airborne pathogens?

A side note, I think that the ozone light brags about its safety, and, in fact, 
states  that it doesn't actually create O3.

Thanks,
Luke

Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Yes ozone is a sterilizer and it is 
also unhealthy to breathe.  High voltage arcs produce ozone and also produce 
nitrogen oxides which are not healthy. Mercury arc lamps produce enough UV to 
make ozone for sure. So does a laser printer. Usually arc lamps have an outer 
envelope to keep air away from the actual bulb.  UV lamps bright enough to make 
O3 are dangerous to the eyes.  What else about ozonelet's see, ozone 
disolved in hot deionized water is hell on wheels for anything organic. Works 
like gang busters as a cleaner for semiconductor wafers. Environmentally 
freindly! Liquid ozone is something like nitroglycerine, watch out for that  
one when using cryogenic pumps with oxygen plasmas. Warm them slowly with a 
nitrogen purgedon't let that ball of frozen ozone melt and drip or we'll 
see you in the next world.  I suppose liquid ozone would beat liquid oxygen for 
starting a barbeque...lol  Don't try this at home kids.

Fun with ozone
Joe

Jeromie Reeves wrote:
  
UV light (when powerful enough) can sterilize many things. There are a   number 
of water plants that use UV for  sterilizing. I dunno about the Ozone Lights 
doing much good on the O3   side (namely, is O3 a sterilizing agent?).  I think 
there are better ways to make O3 such as direct electrical arc   (jacobs 
ladder). Some ion machines also  produce O3.Luke Hansen wrote:  
  
Hello all,I was just wondering if anyone has heard anything  about the 
effects of these Ozone Lights. I guess 
 that they don't actually create O3, but they do kill  airborne pathogens. Most 
of the online literature that  I've found goes back to one study that showed 
this  light effective in killing E. Coli bacteria in  clinical trials. Anyone 
have experiences with this, or  anything   similiar?Thanks,  Luke

  Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it 
now.___  Biofuel mailing list  
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org  
Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html  Search 
the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): 
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/  

  ___ Biofuel mailing list 
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org  
Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html  Search 
the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): 
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

Re: [Biofuel] TiO2 (Titanium Dioxide) Lights

2006-12-15 Thread Kirk McLoren
not that expensive. Quartz is an industrial material. Sapphire is more 
expensive- look at a multivapor lamp. The discharge is in a sapphire tube.. 
Borosilicate glass filters almost all the short uv and a lot of the longwave 
uv. I used to have some 8 foot quartz tubes. They make ozone quite well.
   
  some small bulbs
  http://www.topbulb.com/find/germicidal.asp
  http://www.topbulb.com/find/uv.asp
  

Luke Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I think that the company that makes these lights just chose Ozone Light 
because it sounded cool to them. Has nothing to do with creation of O3. 

Kirk, What do you mean by opaque? Do you mean that none or some of the UV 
goes through the glass?

And quartz? wouldn't that manufacturing proscess be very expensive...resulting 
in really high retail prices?



Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Its the short uv that produces ozone
  275nm?
  You need the mercury vapor lamps that are made of quartz.
  Glass is opaque to uv.
   
  Kirk

Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Luke;

What is required to create ozone electrically is an arc open to air.  The 
voltage required for this depends on the distance between electrodes or 'air 
gap' small gap requires lower voltage.  Another way is to have a very high 
voltage which produces a corona.  This is not quite like an arc but does cause 
local ionization of the air around the tip of the sharp electrode. 

Yes UV light can produce ozone (O3) I cannot remember which wavelength but a 
mercury arc lamp produces several spectral peaks and one of them causes ozone 
formation. 

Yes the high intensity UV light can cause burns to the skin and eyes.  As well 
the ozone is toxic to breathe.  On your last comment I am confused.  You 
realize ozone and O3 are the same thing?  If the lamp claims to produce ozone 
then it is producing O3. If it claims not to produce O3 then it cannot be 
called an ozone lamp!

J

Luke Hansen wrote:
  Excellent. I appreciate all of the input. In the past, I've used UV 
sterylizers in my marine aquaria, but never really had a need for indoor air 
purification. Now I do, so I'm examining my options. First a few 
points/questions...

* very high voltages are required to create O3, correct?
* UV light between certain nanometers creates O3?
* This ozone light could also be harmful to people, as well as eliminating 
airborne pathogens?

A side note, I think that the ozone light brags about its safety, and, in fact, 
states that it doesn't actually create O3.

Thanks,
Luke

Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Yes ozone is a sterilizer and it is 
also unhealthy to breathe.  High voltage arcs produce ozone and also produce 
nitrogen oxides which are not healthy. Mercury arc lamps produce enough UV to 
make ozone for sure. So does a laser printer. Usually arc lamps have an outer 
envelope to keep air away from the actual bulb.  UV lamps bright enough to make 
O3 are dangerous to the eyes.  What else about ozonelet's see, ozone 
disolved in hot deionized water is hell on wheels for anything organic. Works 
like gang busters as a cleaner for semiconductor wafers. Environmentally 
freindly! Liquid ozone is something like nitroglycerine, watch out for that one 
when using cryogenic pumps with oxygen plasmas. Warm them slowly with a 
nitrogen purgedon't let that ball of frozen ozone melt and drip or we'll 
see you in the next world.  I suppose liquid ozone would beat liquid oxygen for 
starting a barbeque...lol  Don't try this at home kids.

Fun with ozone
Joe

Jeromie Reeves wrote:
  
UV light (when powerful enough) can sterilize many things. There are a   number 
of water plants that use UV for  sterilizing. I dunno about the Ozone Lights 
doing much good on the O3   side (namely, is O3 a sterilizing agent?).  I think 
there are better ways to make O3 such as direct electrical arc   (jacobs 
ladder). Some ion machines also  produce O3.Luke Hansen wrote:  
  
Hello all,I was just wondering if anyone has heard anything  about the 
effects of these Ozone Lights. I guess 
 that they don't actually create O3, but they do kill  airborne pathogens. Most 
of the online literature that  I've found goes back to one study that showed 
this  light effective in killing E. Coli bacteria in  clinical trials. Anyone 
have experiences with this, or  anything   similiar?Thanks,  Luke  

  Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it 
now.___  Biofuel mailing list  
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org  
Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html  Search 
the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): 
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/