[Biofuel] Exciting Couple Drives From Alaska to Chile on Nothing But Cooking Oil

2013-11-09 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2013/11/driving_from_alaska_to_chile_o.php

Exciting Couple Drives From Alaska to Chile on Nothing But Cooking Oil


By Brian Rinker Fri., Nov. 8 2013 at 3:09 PM

Carola Teixidó and Victor Millán are living my dream. The Chilean 
couple, both graphic designers, is driving from Alaska to Chile in a 
1996 Ford pickup truck with a pop-up camper that's been converted to run 
on used vegetable oil.


They call her Piscola. The name is derived from pisco, the Chilean 
national drink, grape brandy, and cola.


Their next stop: San Francisco.

This isn't some wild hair they got -- Teixidó and Millán's trip is well 
thought-out; they planned ahead for the Darien Gap, a wild jungle where 
the Pan-American Highway ends. They bought a truck that could easily fit 
into one of the shipping containers necessary to get Piscola to South 
America. A shipping container costs about $2,000, said Teixidó. But they 
hope to split the cost by sharing the container with another vehicle. 
The gap doesn't have developed roads and is thought to be full of 
guerrilla warriors. You can hike it, but some hikers are never seen 
again. You could also fly over it, or boat around it. With a car, you 
have to take a ship.


But the gap won't present a problem for while. They have to make it 
there first -- and they have a long way to go.


Teixidó and Millán have set aside a year for the trip, perhaps longer, 
to cross 15 countries and travel 26,000 miles. Right now, 116 days in, 
the traveling Chileans have been stuck in Portland, Oregon for three 
days. And it's a classic Portland dilemma, one that could be seen on 
Portlandia. The problem: Too many eco-friendly people are in their way. 
The bio-diesel community is so big there that all the restaurants are 
either out of used cooking oil or contract it out to someone else.


Once they can get some waste oil, Teixidó hopes to be cruising down the 
highway soon, french fry fumes wafting in the air, toward San Francisco. 
They've already traveled about 6,000 miles and burned more than 400 
gallons of old, stinky vegetable oil.


The oil isn't stinky to Teixidó. She said it smells likes french fries 
or fried fish. They get the waste oil from restaurants, pour it through 
a shirt to filter out the fried food pieces, and dump it in a 
centrifuge, which separates the oil from the muck.


They're not strangers to adventure. Both were born in Santiago, Chile, 
and both are avid backpackers and travelers. After obtaining Canadian 
year-long work visas, they flew over there from Chile and began shopping 
for a truck and making arrangements for the great Alaska-to-Chile trip.


They calculated it would be around $6,000 in gas money for traveling 
46,000 kilometers. By converting the truck to run on cooking vegetable 
oil, they hope to save money, and, of course, have a cleaner, 
environmentally-friendlier vehicle. According to their estimates, the 
whole trip should cost around $30,000, not including unforeseen 
mechanical problems. The couple makes money on the road using laptops to 
do design work for clients in Chile. To help supplement the costs, 
Teixidó and Millán offer postcards of their travels to stores for a 
donation, which sometimes amounts to $1 and when they're lucky, they 
pocket $20.


They're also sponsored. A couple companies have donated gear and solar 
panels to help with their travels. With escalating cost, however, they 
could use some more help. If you're interested in sponsoring them or 
just want to keep up-to-date on Teixidó and Millán's exciting 
adventures, check out their blog, or hit them up on facebook or twitter.


In case your wondering, my dream, on the other hand, was to buy a 
motorcycle after high school and drive from Santa Cruz, born and raised 
-- eastside loc, all the way down to Argentina. I pictured myself 
barreling down the highway with a shotgun strapped to my back, swinging 
a machete over my head, as I tore through hordes of banditos. My fantasy 
was loosely based on my favorite childhood movie, Romancing the Stone.


Having said that, if Teixidó or Millán are reading this: Please pick me 
up as you travel through San Francisco, and I'll settle to be the side 
kick, just like Danny DeVito was in the Romancing the Stone.

___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel


[Biofuel] Examining Glycerol as a Potential Marine

2013-11-09 Thread Darryl McMahon

http://www.marinelink.com/news/examining-potential360754.aspx

Posted by Eric Haun

Friday, November 08, 2013

The Technology Strategy Board GLEAMS project is currently investigating 
technology by which marine vessels will be able to surpass the very 
highest regulatory standards required for sulphur and nitrous oxide 
emissions, as well as slashing their carbon emissions and potentially 
reducing fuel costs. One solution may be the use of glycerol, (commonly 
glycerine), as a fuel for marine diesel engines.


There is a global oversupply of glycerol, a by-product of the expanding 
biofuel industry. The characteristics of glycerol make it attractive for 
marine applications: burns with higher efficiency than diesel; very low 
NOx emissions; no sulphur emissions; virtually no particulate matter; 
nontoxic, water soluble and nearly impossible to ignite accidentally; 
requires modification only to the external engine aspiration system; 
readily retrofitted and engine technology proven through use in combined 
heat and power plant.


Glycerol has a relatively low energy density compared to fossil fuels, 
however this is partially offset by increased efficiency. Although a 
greater volume of glycerol would have to be carried for a given range 
its low-hazard nature would allow additional storage in the hull space 
of many vessels.


Although glycerol can be used in diesel engines of any size, until a 
comprehensive distribution network is established GLEAMS will 
concentrate upon markets where limited volumes of fuel are required and 
bunkering typically takes place at a single location. Potential early 
adopters could include offshore support craft, ferries, survey vessels, 
port/pilot boats, fishing vessels, dredgers, marine police and other 
small commercial and leisure marine craft. Pollution hazards associated 
with vessels operating in environmentally sensitive areas could be 
substantially reduced by the benign characteristics of glycerol.


Potential end users and other interested parties can engage with the 
GLEAMS project by joining the GLEAMS Interest Group. Through an online 
forum members will be invited to discuss relevant topics and inform 
project outcomes. The project will explore collaborating with 
appropriate members in the future commercialization of this technology. 
During the project members will be invited to workshops, the first of 
which is scheduled for Thursday, February 27, 2014, hosted by Lloyd’s 
Register in London. More information will be sent to GLEAMS Interest 
Group members nearer the time.


Membership of the GLEAMS Interest Group is free of charge and is 
available at groupspaces.com/GLEAMSInterestGroup/join.

___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel


[Biofuel] Going Nuclear: An Environmentalist Makes the Case

2013-11-09 Thread Keith Addison

TRUTHDIG RADIO
Going Nuclear: An Environmentalist Makes the Case -- This week on 
Truthdig Radio in association with KPFK: The director of Pandora's 
Promise pitches nuclear power. Also: Bringing quality food to the 
poor, and bullying in sports.

http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/going_nuclear_an_environmentalist_makes_the_case_20131107

Pandora's Promise (2013)
Documentary - 15 November 2013 (UK)
Ratings: 6.1/10 from 161 users
Director: Robert Stone
Writer: Robert Stone
Stars: Stewart Brand, Gwyneth Cravens, Mark Lynas
A feature-length documentary about the history and future of nuclear 
power. The film explores how and why mankind's most feared and 
controversial technological discovery is now passionately embraced by 
many of those who once led the charge against it. Operating as 
history, cultural meditation and contemporary exploration, PANDORA'S 
PROMISE aims to inspire a serious and realistic debate over what is 
without question the most important question of our time: how do we 
continue to power modern civilization without destroying it?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1992193/?ref_=fn_al_tt_8

A Conversation With Director Robert Stone of Pandora's Promise
Posted: 11/07/2013 10:05 am
Govindini Murty
Filmmaker and Co-Editor of Libertas Film Magazine
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/govindini-murty/a-conversation-with-direc_b_4232707.html

Robert Stone goes nuclear
November 06, 2013 7:00 am  *  DOUG MOE
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/columnists/doug-moe/doug-moe-robert-stone-goes-nuclear/article_5e614e3b-59d3-5323-b737-0752432069c5.html

'Pandora's Promise' director defends his controversial nuclear energy film
By Robert Stone, Special to CNN
November 8, 2013
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/11/07/opinion/pandora-nuclear-stone-ifr-response/

--0--

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/11/07/opinion/lyman-nuclear-pandora/index.html

Scientist: Film hypes the promise of advanced nuclear technology

By Edwin Lyman, Special to CNN

November 7, 2013

Editor's note: Edwin Lyman, a physicist, is a senior scientist with 
the Union of Concerned Scientists in Washington. For more of his 
critique of Pandora's Promise, see his blog post, Movie Review: Put 
Pandora's Promise Back in the Box. For more on the future of nuclear 
power as a possible solution for global climate change, watch CNN 
Films' presentation of Pandora's Promise, airing on CNN on 
Thursday, November 7, at 9 p.m. ET/PT


(CNN) -- In his zeal to promote nuclear power, filmmaker Robert Stone 
inserted numerous half-truths and less-than-half-truths in his new 
documentary Pandora's Promise, which CNN is airing on November 7. 
One of Stone's more misleading allegations was that scientists at a 
U.S. research facility, the Argonne National Laboratory, were on the 
verge of developing a breakthrough technology that could solve 
nuclear power's numerous problems when the Clinton administration and 
its allies in Congress shut the program in 1994 for purely political 
reasons.


Like the story of Pandora itself, the tale of the integral fast 
reactor (IFR) -- or at least the version presented in the movie -- is 
more myth than reality. In the final assessment, the concept's 
drawbacks greatly outweighed its advantages. The government had sound 
reasons to stanch the flow of taxpayer dollars to a costly, flawed 
project that also was undermining U.S. efforts to reduce the risks of 
nuclear terrorism and proliferation around the world.


Read what Robert Stone has to say
http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/07/opinion/pandora-nuclear-stone-ifr-response/index.html

In the film, scientists who worked on the IFR program unsurprisingly 
sing its praises. For example, Charles Till, a former program 
manager, claimed that the reactor can't melt down and would 
therefore be immune to the type of catastrophes that occurred at 
Three Mile Island in 1979 and Fukushima in 2011.


Others told Stone that the reactor, by recycling its own used, or 
spent, fuel, would conserve uranium resources and produce much less 
nuclear waste than conventional reactors. But the reactor's advocates 
didn't tell the whole story, and Stone did not include anyone in the 
film who could have provided a more balanced and realistic assessment.


What did Pandora's Promise leave out? First, it does not clearly 
explain what a fast reactor is and how it differs from the 
water-cooled reactors in use today. Most operating reactors use a 
type of fuel called low-enriched uranium, which cannot be used 
directly to make a nuclear weapon and poses a low security risk. The 
spent fuel from these water-cooled reactors contains weapon-usable 
plutonium as a byproduct, but it is very hard to make into a bomb 
because it is mixed with uranium and highly radioactive fission 
products.


Fast reactors, on the other hand, are far more dangerous because they 
typically require fuels made from plutonium or highly enriched 
uranium that can be used to make nuclear weapons.


In fact, fast reactors can be operated as 

[Biofuel] Biodiesel Processor for Sale in Denver

2013-11-09 Thread Jake Kruger
Hi All,

I happened to see someone in the Denver area is selling a biodiesel
processor on Craigslist and wanted to post the link in case anyone is
interested.  I don't know the guy, and don't know anything about the
processor, other than that it seems to still be available.  The link is
herehttp://denver.craigslist.org/pts/4164311472.html.

Best,

Jake
___
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel