Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-18 Thread greg Kelly
No problem...what's BioK?FWIW, I really don't feel myself on the antibiotics - my digestion is fouled up.It is clearly not infected I wonder it I can stop them?  Conventional wisdom is that once you start a regimen of antibiotics, you finish them. If you stop in mid-regimen, you run the risk of making the bugs that causing you problems now immune, as well as your body's own defense mechanisms have problems. I always eat yogurt when taking them and it helps the digestion. But then, I eat yogurt all the time, anyway. :-)  Greg K___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-17 Thread Mike Weaver
Well, I was attacked by a pit bull while splitting wood this week on my 
land.  (The owner did pull the dog away before I split *IT'S* head)
After all the shots and what not, when I got a look at the wound which 
was way ugly, deep and full of who knows what I did consent to take a
broad spectrum antibiotic.  I'm eating yogurt too - hope it keep the 
good bugs up.

I think antibiotics are way over prescribed in the US.  I was a good 
American child and drank tons of milk and had constant ear infections.  
When I grew up I stopped drinking any milk and have never again had an 
ear infection.  My daughter doesn't drink any milk and never gets ear 
infections.

As for the raw food diet, I've done that, I personally felt great and 
did not lose an ounce, but I ate raw fish and grass-fed beef on it.  
When I tried it as stricly vegetarian I did feel like I had to eat all 
the time.



Garth  Kim Travis wrote:

Greetings,
What is there to jump on here?  I personally only take anti-biotics when it 
is life and death, but then I am allergic to most of them so it is a toss 
up which is going to kill me.  A fever of 105, I would have dumped her in 
an ice bath and called an ambulance.  Drugs do have their place, and yes, I 
too hope she would give them to her child rather than see the child 
permanently damaged.
Bright Blessings,
Kim

At 08:20 AM 4/16/2006, you wrote:

  

Naturally, there's a little shudder here.  What are grandparents for, but to
shudder?  I'm referring to my daughter who went down to 90 pounds on the raw
food diet, and nearly died of pneumonia because she refused to take an
anti-biotic.  That was an interesting week, changing her sheets four times a
day as she sweat into them, her fever going to 105, holding her fiery hand
and offering sips of water all night.  She would have held out, I think.
She told me later that she finally agreed to go to hospital because she
could see she was pushing me past MY limits of physical strength.  Will she
give her baby an antibiotic when it could save her life?  Hope so.

I guess Kim Travis will jump on me for that one.  That thread has already
had it's day, maybe.

Cheers, Jesse





___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-17 Thread Garth Kim Travis
Greetings,
You may want to look into taking kefir rather than yogurt.  Here is my 
favorite kefir site.
http://users.sa.chariot.net.au/~dna/kefirpage.html
I do have a few grains to share at this time.
Bright Blessings,
Kim


At 08:41 AM 4/17/2006, you wrote:
Well, I was attacked by a pit bull while splitting wood this week on my
land.  (The owner did pull the dog away before I split *IT'S* head)
After all the shots and what not, when I got a look at the wound which
was way ugly, deep and full of who knows what I did consent to take a
broad spectrum antibiotic.  I'm eating yogurt too - hope it keep the
good bugs up.

I think antibiotics are way over prescribed in the US.  I was a good
American child and drank tons of milk and had constant ear infections.
When I grew up I stopped drinking any milk and have never again had an
ear infection.  My daughter doesn't drink any milk and never gets ear
infections.

As for the raw food diet, I've done that, I personally felt great and
did not lose an ounce, but I ate raw fish and grass-fed beef on it.
When I tried it as stricly vegetarian I did feel like I had to eat all
the time.



Garth  Kim Travis wrote:

 Greetings,
 What is there to jump on here?  I personally only take anti-biotics when it
 is life and death, but then I am allergic to most of them so it is a toss
 up which is going to kill me.  A fever of 105, I would have dumped her in
 an ice bath and called an ambulance.  Drugs do have their place, and yes, I
 too hope she would give them to her child rather than see the child
 permanently damaged.
 Bright Blessings,
 Kim
 
 At 08:20 AM 4/16/2006, you wrote:
 
 
 
 Naturally, there's a little shudder here.  What are grandparents for, 
 but to
 shudder?  I'm referring to my daughter who went down to 90 pounds on 
 the raw
 food diet, and nearly died of pneumonia because she refused to take an
 anti-biotic.  That was an interesting week, changing her sheets four 
 times a
 day as she sweat into them, her fever going to 105, holding her fiery hand
 and offering sips of water all night.  She would have held out, I think.
 She told me later that she finally agreed to go to hospital because she
 could see she was pushing me past MY limits of physical strength.  Will she
 give her baby an antibiotic when it could save her life?  Hope so.
 
 I guess Kim Travis will jump on me for that one.  That thread has already
 had it's day, maybe.
 
 Cheers, Jesse
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-17 Thread Mike Weaver
kefir?  off to the local coop, then.

-Mike

Garth  Kim Travis wrote:

Greetings,
You may want to look into taking kefir rather than yogurt.  Here is my 
favorite kefir site.
http://users.sa.chariot.net.au/~dna/kefirpage.html
I do have a few grains to share at this time.
Bright Blessings,
Kim


At 08:41 AM 4/17/2006, you wrote:
  

Well, I was attacked by a pit bull while splitting wood this week on my
land.  (The owner did pull the dog away before I split *IT'S* head)
After all the shots and what not, when I got a look at the wound which
was way ugly, deep and full of who knows what I did consent to take a
broad spectrum antibiotic.  I'm eating yogurt too - hope it keep the
good bugs up.

I think antibiotics are way over prescribed in the US.  I was a good
American child and drank tons of milk and had constant ear infections.
When I grew up I stopped drinking any milk and have never again had an
ear infection.  My daughter doesn't drink any milk and never gets ear
infections.

As for the raw food diet, I've done that, I personally felt great and
did not lose an ounce, but I ate raw fish and grass-fed beef on it.
When I tried it as stricly vegetarian I did feel like I had to eat all
the time.



Garth  Kim Travis wrote:



Greetings,
What is there to jump on here?  I personally only take anti-biotics when it
is life and death, but then I am allergic to most of them so it is a toss
up which is going to kill me.  A fever of 105, I would have dumped her in
an ice bath and called an ambulance.  Drugs do have their place, and yes, I
too hope she would give them to her child rather than see the child
permanently damaged.
Bright Blessings,
Kim

At 08:20 AM 4/16/2006, you wrote:



  

Naturally, there's a little shudder here.  What are grandparents for, 


but to


shudder?  I'm referring to my daughter who went down to 90 pounds on 


the raw


food diet, and nearly died of pneumonia because she refused to take an
anti-biotic.  That was an interesting week, changing her sheets four 


times a


day as she sweat into them, her fever going to 105, holding her fiery hand
and offering sips of water all night.  She would have held out, I think.
She told me later that she finally agreed to go to hospital because she
could see she was pushing me past MY limits of physical strength.  Will she
give her baby an antibiotic when it could save her life?  Hope so.

I guess Kim Travis will jump on me for that one.  That thread has already
had it's day, maybe.

Cheers, Jesse





___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  

messages):


http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



  


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/





___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-17 Thread mark manchester
Kim, Mike,
Thanks for your letters.  She's 25 years old, not for me to dump her into an
icebath.  This was the problem!  I very much appreciate the place of
anitbiotics and now I think she does too.  Hard lesson.

I really thank you Mike for the input on the raw meat thing, that surely
would have helped, I'm sure.  Incidentally, she has been back to a regular
vegetarian diet for over a year, and is all well, she's vigorous, and back
in university, all that stuff.  Patience may be a good thing.

Yup, kefir, or BioK?  No real point though, until you have finished your
antibiotic dosage.  They'll all just get killed.
Jesse

 From: Garth  Kim Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:25:53 -0500
 To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
 
 Greetings,
 What is there to jump on here?  I personally only take anti-biotics when it
 is life and death, but then I am allergic to most of them so it is a toss
 up which is going to kill me.  A fever of 105, I would have dumped her in
 an ice bath and called an ambulance.  Drugs do have their place, and yes, I
 too hope she would give them to her child rather than see the child
 permanently damaged.
 Bright Blessings,
 Kim
 
 At 08:20 AM 4/16/2006, you wrote:
 
 Naturally, there's a little shudder here.  What are grandparents for, but to
 shudder?  I'm referring to my daughter who went down to 90 pounds on the raw
 food diet, and nearly died of pneumonia because she refused to take an
 anti-biotic.  That was an interesting week, changing her sheets four times a
 day as she sweat into them, her fever going to 105, holding her fiery hand
 and offering sips of water all night.  She would have held out, I think.
 She told me later that she finally agreed to go to hospital because she
 could see she was pushing me past MY limits of physical strength.  Will she
 give her baby an antibiotic when it could save her life?  Hope so.
 
 I guess Kim Travis will jump on me for that one.  That thread has already
 had it's day, maybe.
 
 Cheers, Jesse
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-17 Thread Mike Weaver
No problem...

what's BioK?

FWIW, I really don't feel myself on the antibiotics - my digestion is 
fouled up.

It is clearly not infected I wonder it I can stop them?

mark manchester wrote:

Kim, Mike,
Thanks for your letters.  She's 25 years old, not for me to dump her into an
icebath.  This was the problem!  I very much appreciate the place of
anitbiotics and now I think she does too.  Hard lesson.

I really thank you Mike for the input on the raw meat thing, that surely
would have helped, I'm sure.  Incidentally, she has been back to a regular
vegetarian diet for over a year, and is all well, she's vigorous, and back
in university, all that stuff.  Patience may be a good thing.

Yup, kefir, or BioK?  No real point though, until you have finished your
antibiotic dosage.  They'll all just get killed.
Jesse

  

From: Garth  Kim Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:25:53 -0500
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

Greetings,
What is there to jump on here?  I personally only take anti-biotics when it
is life and death, but then I am allergic to most of them so it is a toss
up which is going to kill me.  A fever of 105, I would have dumped her in
an ice bath and called an ambulance.  Drugs do have their place, and yes, I
too hope she would give them to her child rather than see the child
permanently damaged.
Bright Blessings,
Kim

At 08:20 AM 4/16/2006, you wrote:



Naturally, there's a little shudder here.  What are grandparents for, but to
shudder?  I'm referring to my daughter who went down to 90 pounds on the raw
food diet, and nearly died of pneumonia because she refused to take an
anti-biotic.  That was an interesting week, changing her sheets four times a
day as she sweat into them, her fever going to 105, holding her fiery hand
and offering sips of water all night.  She would have held out, I think.
She told me later that she finally agreed to go to hospital because she
could see she was pushing me past MY limits of physical strength.  Will she
give her baby an antibiotic when it could save her life?  Hope so.

I guess Kim Travis will jump on me for that one.  That thread has already
had it's day, maybe.

Cheers, Jesse
  


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/






___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-17 Thread mark manchester
Acidopholis, concentrated.  Cute little tubs in your health food
refrigerator section.  Terrible digestion is your foe for sure with
antibiotics.  But it will soon be over and you'll be alive.  Yay!

Poor you, what a dreadful accident.
Jesse

 From: Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:08:37 -0400
 To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
 
 No problem...
 
 what's BioK?
 
 FWIW, I really don't feel myself on the antibiotics - my digestion is
 fouled up.
 
 It is clearly not infected I wonder it I can stop them?
 
 mark manchester wrote:
 
 Kim, Mike,
 Thanks for your letters.  She's 25 years old, not for me to dump her into an
 icebath.  This was the problem!  I very much appreciate the place of
 anitbiotics and now I think she does too.  Hard lesson.
 
 I really thank you Mike for the input on the raw meat thing, that surely
 would have helped, I'm sure.  Incidentally, she has been back to a regular
 vegetarian diet for over a year, and is all well, she's vigorous, and back
 in university, all that stuff.  Patience may be a good thing.
 
 Yup, kefir, or BioK?  No real point though, until you have finished your
 antibiotic dosage.  They'll all just get killed.
 Jesse
 
 
 
 From: Garth  Kim Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:25:53 -0500
 To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
 
 Greetings,
 What is there to jump on here?  I personally only take anti-biotics when it
 is life and death, but then I am allergic to most of them so it is a toss
 up which is going to kill me.  A fever of 105, I would have dumped her in
 an ice bath and called an ambulance.  Drugs do have their place, and yes, I
 too hope she would give them to her child rather than see the child
 permanently damaged.
 Bright Blessings,
 Kim
 
 At 08:20 AM 4/16/2006, you wrote:
 
 
 
 Naturally, there's a little shudder here.  What are grandparents for, but
 to
 shudder?  I'm referring to my daughter who went down to 90 pounds on the
 raw
 food diet, and nearly died of pneumonia because she refused to take an
 anti-biotic.  That was an interesting week, changing her sheets four times
 a
 day as she sweat into them, her fever going to 105, holding her fiery hand
 and offering sips of water all night.  She would have held out, I think.
 She told me later that she finally agreed to go to hospital because she
 could see she was pushing me past MY limits of physical strength.  Will she
 give her baby an antibiotic when it could save her life?  Hope so.
 
 I guess Kim Travis will jump on me for that one.  That thread has already
 had it's day, maybe.
 
 Cheers, Jesse
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-16 Thread mark manchester
Hi again Keith,

[snip]

 they
 say Naah, you're nuts, this is the way our grandfathers and
 great-grandfathers always did it and it's good enough for us.
 
 Why do people forget that?
 
 Don't know. Maybe it wouldn't work so well otherwise.
 
 My mother was herself arrested in a political
 demonstration, yet is deeply horrified that my daughter would expose herself
 to the possibility.  Okay, I guess she sees it as a low point in her
 political career.
 
 I got arrested too, in a different sort of political demonstration,
 but it's just something that happened.
 
 There's no dishonour in such an arrest. But there's also Rachel
 Corrie, and a hell of a lot of other people. That's something to be
 concerned about.

Absolutely right.
[more snipping, this letter is getting REALLY long]

 They say people who have children and people who don't
 have children always feel sorry for each other. I think that's really
 funny!
 
 There's certainly regret either way.  The way I heard it, those with
 children and those without ENVY each other.
 
 Whoops! There we go.
 
 I see I'll have to explain myself. I love lots of my friends and I
 love their families and their children, but I've never envied anybody
 for having children. Truly, never. No regret, not even a twinge, not
 ever.

Yay!
 
 To a lot of parents that simply has to mean I just don't understand,
 or that I just won't admit it, unless I'm some kind of inhuman
 monster inside. I don't appear to be a monster, so I must simply be
 deluded - it's self-evident that life cannot be fulfilled without
 having children. Some people have told me What a pity, you'd make
 such a good father. But I'd make a lousy father - the only reason
 they think I'd make a good father is that I'm not one.
 
 People who want children should have them. People who wanted children
 and didn't have them will have regrets instead and maybe envy, and
 that's always sad. Then there are people who didn't want them but
 didn't quite realise it and went along with the tide and it happened
 to them anyway, which doesn't usually work out well for anyone.
 
 But I don't think people who didn't want them and deliberately didn't
 have them feel any regret, unless they made a mistake. But it's not
 easy not to have children, you have to be determined, there's a lot
 of pressure. You do get the chance to change your mind, to say the
 least.

I'm quite pro-choice, myself.  Child-rearing is hard enough without actually
wanting it!  Babies change EVERYTHING!  And lots of people don't want to fix
something that's not broken.
 
 Like everything else that's alive, I'm the current keeper of a
 portion of life that's been faithfully passed along millions of times
 from generation to generation over more than a billion years. That's
 all very humbling no doubt, but it doesn't mean I have any sacred
 obligation to pass it along to the next link in the chain, that's up
 to me. It might sound a bit specious to say that maybe if it
 shouldn't have ended here and now with me I wouldn't have been able
 to put a stop to it, but it might be true. Among other things. What's
 so special about me anyway that posterity can't do without? Very
 unconvincing.

I would even politely suggest that you would perhaps not be the excellent
teacher you are if you had put your energy into raising a bunch of kids.
How much steam does a human being have?  I feel pretty pooped after
twenty-five years of mothering our four kids.  How else might I have turned
out?
 
 Once you realise it's purely your own decision and you're free to
 make either way, if indeed that's the case, it's kind of hard to find
 any good reason for having them. You think it has to be brain
 chemicals or something doing weird Darwinian things to people's heads
 that makes them feel that way or they just wouldn't do it to
 themselves. From this point of view it's the parents who're deluded.
 The strange difference is that one wouldn't dream of applying such
 thinking to anyone, it's just a thought, not a prejudice, but the
 parents feel no such inhibition. Usually they don't want to mention
 it because they'd hate to embarrass you, poor thing. LOL!
 
 I wouldn't know if they're envious, but I've been told a few times by
 parents that it's all very well for me, I don't have any
 responsibilities to think about so I can do whatever I like. As if
 I've shirked my duty or something. True that I don't have their
 responsibilities, but they can't seem to conceive of any other kind.
 I don't think that was envy, more like resentment.
 
 Feel sorry for, envy... maybe it's just can't understand. But the
 feel-sorry-for version tickles me. Quite often people with children
 feel sorry for me, and I think it's funny. Not when they get to know
 me a bit better though. Maybe then they just think it serves me
 right, LOL!

Let there be no guilt in this choice, for crying out loud, and no blame!
 
 Kahlil Gibran, also FWIW, wrote that children are the arrows of the
 future, you can 

Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-16 Thread Mike Weaver
mark manchester wrote:

Hi again Keith,

[snip]

 they
  

say Naah, you're nuts, this is the way our grandfathers and
great-grandfathers always did it and it's good enough for us.


Sometimes it's true - my greats heated with wood, didn't use chemicals 
on their farms and travelled by sail ;-)

Why do people forget that?
  

Don't know. Maybe it wouldn't work so well otherwise.



My mother was herself arrested in a political
demonstration, yet is deeply horrified that my daughter would expose herself
to the possibility.  Okay, I guess she sees it as a low point in her
political career.
  

I got arrested too, in a different sort of political demonstration,
but it's just something that happened.

There's no dishonour in such an arrest. But there's also Rachel
Corrie, and a hell of a lot of other people. That's something to be
concerned about.



Absolutely right.
[more snipping, this letter is getting REALLY long]

  

They say people who have children and people who don't
have children always feel sorry for each other. I think that's really
funny!


There's certainly regret either way.  The way I heard it, those with
children and those without ENVY each other.
  

Whoops! There we go.

I see I'll have to explain myself. I love lots of my friends and I
love their families and their children, but I've never envied anybody
for having children. Truly, never. No regret, not even a twinge, not
ever.



Yay!
  

To a lot of parents that simply has to mean I just don't understand,
or that I just won't admit it, unless I'm some kind of inhuman
monster inside. I don't appear to be a monster, so I must simply be
deluded - it's self-evident that life cannot be fulfilled without
having children. Some people have told me What a pity, you'd make
such a good father. But I'd make a lousy father - the only reason
they think I'd make a good father is that I'm not one.

People who want children should have them. People who wanted children
and didn't have them will have regrets instead and maybe envy, and
that's always sad. Then there are people who didn't want them but
didn't quite realise it and went along with the tide and it happened
to them anyway, which doesn't usually work out well for anyone.

But I don't think people who didn't want them and deliberately didn't
have them feel any regret, unless they made a mistake. But it's not
easy not to have children, you have to be determined, there's a lot
of pressure. You do get the chance to change your mind, to say the
least.



I'm quite pro-choice, myself.  Child-rearing is hard enough without actually
wanting it!  Babies change EVERYTHING!  And lots of people don't want to fix
something that's not broken.
  

Like everything else that's alive, I'm the current keeper of a
portion of life that's been faithfully passed along millions of times
from generation to generation over more than a billion years. That's
all very humbling no doubt, but it doesn't mean I have any sacred
obligation to pass it along to the next link in the chain, that's up
to me. It might sound a bit specious to say that maybe if it
shouldn't have ended here and now with me I wouldn't have been able
to put a stop to it, but it might be true. Among other things. What's
so special about me anyway that posterity can't do without? Very
unconvincing.



I would even politely suggest that you would perhaps not be the excellent
teacher you are if you had put your energy into raising a bunch of kids.
How much steam does a human being have?  I feel pretty pooped after
twenty-five years of mothering our four kids.  How else might I have turned
out?
  

Once you realise it's purely your own decision and you're free to
make either way, if indeed that's the case, it's kind of hard to find
any good reason for having them. You think it has to be brain
chemicals or something doing weird Darwinian things to people's heads
that makes them feel that way or they just wouldn't do it to
themselves. From this point of view it's the parents who're deluded.
The strange difference is that one wouldn't dream of applying such
thinking to anyone, it's just a thought, not a prejudice, but the
parents feel no such inhibition. Usually they don't want to mention
it because they'd hate to embarrass you, poor thing. LOL!

I wouldn't know if they're envious, but I've been told a few times by
parents that it's all very well for me, I don't have any
responsibilities to think about so I can do whatever I like. As if
I've shirked my duty or something. True that I don't have their
responsibilities, but they can't seem to conceive of any other kind.
I don't think that was envy, more like resentment.

Feel sorry for, envy... maybe it's just can't understand. But the
feel-sorry-for version tickles me. Quite often people with children
feel sorry for me, and I think it's funny. Not when they get to know
me a bit better though. Maybe then they just think it serves me
right, LOL!



Let there be no 

Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-16 Thread Garth Kim Travis
Greetings,
What is there to jump on here?  I personally only take anti-biotics when it 
is life and death, but then I am allergic to most of them so it is a toss 
up which is going to kill me.  A fever of 105, I would have dumped her in 
an ice bath and called an ambulance.  Drugs do have their place, and yes, I 
too hope she would give them to her child rather than see the child 
permanently damaged.
Bright Blessings,
Kim

At 08:20 AM 4/16/2006, you wrote:

Naturally, there's a little shudder here.  What are grandparents for, but to
shudder?  I'm referring to my daughter who went down to 90 pounds on the raw
food diet, and nearly died of pneumonia because she refused to take an
anti-biotic.  That was an interesting week, changing her sheets four times a
day as she sweat into them, her fever going to 105, holding her fiery hand
and offering sips of water all night.  She would have held out, I think.
She told me later that she finally agreed to go to hospital because she
could see she was pushing me past MY limits of physical strength.  Will she
give her baby an antibiotic when it could save her life?  Hope so.

I guess Kim Travis will jump on me for that one.  That thread has already
had it's day, maybe.

Cheers, Jesse



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-15 Thread Fred Finch
Hi Keith and everyone, If I could jump in on the subject of people having kids for a moment...I have friends who are great teachers. Of them, a large portion of them do not have children by choice. They love teaching but having kids of their own is not part of the equation. Teaching requires continual learning and less time for personal pursuits. Children, for them, would remove the ability and freedom to teach.
I have always felt that Keith is a great teacher. Taking information and presenting it to everyone in a concise form that we all can use and understand. This does not make a great teacher a great parent. 
Also, I was raised on Frank Zappa. The first album that I was allowed to buy was Hot Rats.Music from the factories of mass consumption had no appeal for me. I remember listening to Iggy Pop and the Stooges - Raw Power when I was eight years old and watching my mother cringe.
In the era of Disco, the Sex Pistols was the perfect antidote. Mom hated that one.All my life music has been different than the big box, money making machine that we are forced to endure on broadcast radio. 
But I digress...fredfredOn 4/14/06, Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:Hi again Jessesnip  (Off-topic??? Grrr!) Sure, just as long as you're blithe about it.
I see your Grrr!What, the care and future of the planet is not off-topic,eh?Good point.I guess I was confining my thinking to the Title.Well, that too.snip  Balance of idealism and practicality indeed.But what kid is practical?
  Bringing up the question of when is it that human beings become1) aware of  their mortaility2) humbled by it3) able to get anybody to listen to  them. 
  Okay, I'll try, though how would I know...   When it's too late? Or just in time maybe.This is IMHE the prevailing feeling among very many 20-somethings.A sortof terrible urgency, bordering on despair.
But that doesn't strike me as inappropriate right now.  This is about the Sixties. Don't trust anyone over 30! they used to  say in the Sixties. LOL!   But it's a lot easier to get taken seriously after you're 30,
  suddenly you find you don't have to bother about it much anymore.  Hopefully there's still something left by then. You know the old  saying: If you're not a liberal when you're 25 there's something
  wrong with you; if you're still a liberal when you're 35 there's  something wrong with you. But that's the  if-you-can't-beat-them-join-them school of being taken seriously.
Yes, the hard line.  Psychologists have said 80% or something of people don't show any  significant further character development after the age of 25. So  maybe your answer is 25. But idealism? They want to change the world?
  Not 25 then, not if you're talking of the creative minority. But  who'd want to be part of the creative minority anyway? Ahead of their  time, out of step with everyone else, and totally essential. Yuk. And
  never taken seriously. Every peasant village has its innovator  farmer, he tinkers with stuff, tries it this way and that way and  finds some better answers, but everyone else laughs at him. But it
  turns out that when their sons grow up and take over they do it the  tinker's way, and when someone new suggests something different they  say Naah, you're nuts, this is the way our grandfathers and
  great-grandfathers always did it and it's good enough for us.Why do people forget that?Don't know. Maybe it wouldn't work so well otherwise.My mother was herself arrested in a political
demonstration, yet is deeply horrified that my daughter would expose herselfto the possibility.Okay, I guess she sees it as a low point in herpolitical career.I got arrested too, in a different sort of political demonstration,
but it's just something that happened.There's no dishonour in such an arrest. But there's also RachelCorrie, and a hell of a lot of other people. That's something to beconcerned about.  When my friends and I started turning about 50 we started saying
  things like this, with some dismay: But the more I learn the less I  know! LOL! At least it's a bit humble. A guy I worked for once told  me I'm the sort of person who never stops learning, which kind of
  startled me at the time. He wasn't being nice, he was angry with me.  With any luck I'll go on knowing less and less until finally I know  nothing at all - nirvana! It makes you think of the 80% who stop at
  25, maybe it's learning that they stop doing. Well, I have no  argument with them at all, and it doesn't have to stop them growing  old and wise, and graceful, it seeps in by osmosis anyway.
Hope so.   Kids, I guess if you just love them it'll all turn out the way it  should, imsh'allah. But loving them can be really uphill work, they  can sure be hard to like at times. It probably doesn't matter though
  because the chemo-psychological effects or whatever of the act of  having them in the first place turns their parents permanently  somewhat nuts so they go right on loving them anyway no matter what,
  fool me twice doesn't 

Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-15 Thread mark manchester
LOL!  No, she ran away at 16 and married a scoundrel.  Never wanted to go to
church again, either.  Produced two great daughters, mind you, in war-time
Canada, a single mom (scoundrel absentee).  No family help.  Quite crappy.
She was my great friend in her retirement.
Jesse

 From: Michael Gian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:56:03 -0500
 To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From:  mark manchester
 
 snip
 My Grandmother was sent to a convent when she was four, and never came back!
 
 Grandpa? A priest?
 
 GASOH,
 Michael
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-15 Thread mark manchester
Dear Gustl,

 From: Gustl Steiner-Zehender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:26:51 -0400
 To: mark manchester Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
 
 Hallo Jesse,
 
 Hey  dere!  So  how's by you, eh? Well, I know a fellow named Mark who
 used to live in Manchester, Michigan.
 
 Wednesday, 12 April, 2006, 18:00:11, you wrote:
 
 mm Hi Gustl, Mike,
 mm No  one  ever  answers my posts (except Keith, our hero), so I can
 mm blithely write on this delightfully off-topic topic.
 
 ...snip...
 
 mm Balance  of  idealism  and  practicality  indeed.  But what kid is
 mm practical?  Bringing  up  the  question  of  when is it that human
 mm beings  become  1)  aware  of their mortaility 2) humbled by it 3)
 mm able   to  get  anybody  to  listen  to  them.  I  mean  this  not
 mm morphologically, but as a maturity thing.
 
 mm Kids  today!  So  accountable!  Like  THEY have to fix everything.
 mm While  listening  to  the  Beatles!!!  (I  have  not criticized my
 mm children  on  this,  incidentally, they are still impressed that I
 mm know all the words.)
 
 Well,  I  just  arrived home and downloaded my mail and see that Keith
 has  already  answered you.  The only things I have to add are that it
 is the balance which is of primary importance and I like Frank Sinatra
 as  well  as Frank Zappa.  Well, I guess I should add that if you want
 to hear the best album ever recorded, IMNSHO, try and find Willis Alan
 Ramsey.   He  only  made one album and it had his name.  Every song on
 the  thing is a winner.

I'll take any advice in music that you offer.  I'm sure you're very
discerning.  I'm rushing out to find this Willis Alan Ramsey.

My taste in music is eclectic in the extreme.
 We  once  had  to  write an essay on our favorite type of music and it
 wouldn't  have  taken me an essay to tell that...good music.  You know
 it  when  you  hear  it  even if you don't understand the language the
 words  are in or recognize the instruments which are being played. ;o)
 
 Hope  you get some other answers brother.  I can't imagine Keith being
 the only one to answer any post on this list.  hahaha
 
 Happy Happy,
 
 Gustl

Thanks Gustl!  Mark is my husband, sorry that my email name is so confusing.
I have been reprimanded about this and should fix it, dammit!  Thanks for
answering my mail, but more, thanks for your many thoughtful and helpful
posts, you are a very compassionate and informed person and I always rush to
open your letters.
Jesse


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-14 Thread Keith Addison
Hi again Jesse

snip

  (Off-topic??? Grrr!) Sure, just as long as you're blithe about it.

I see your Grrr!  What, the care and future of the planet is not off-topic,
eh?  Good point.  I guess I was confining my thinking to the Title.

Well, that too.

snip

  Balance of idealism and practicality indeed.  But what kid is practical?
  Bringing up the question of when is it that human beings become 
1) aware of
  their mortaility  2) humbled by it  3) able to get anybody to listen to
  them.
 
  Okay, I'll try, though how would I know...
 
  When it's too late? Or just in time maybe.

This is IMHE the prevailing feeling among very many 20-somethings.  A sort
of terrible urgency, bordering on despair.

But that doesn't strike me as inappropriate right now.

  This is about the Sixties. Don't trust anyone over 30! they used to
  say in the Sixties. LOL!
 
  But it's a lot easier to get taken seriously after you're 30,
  suddenly you find you don't have to bother about it much anymore.
  Hopefully there's still something left by then. You know the old
  saying: If you're not a liberal when you're 25 there's something
  wrong with you; if you're still a liberal when you're 35 there's
  something wrong with you. But that's the
  if-you-can't-beat-them-join-them school of being taken seriously.

Yes, the hard line.

  Psychologists have said 80% or something of people don't show any
  significant further character development after the age of 25. So
  maybe your answer is 25. But idealism? They want to change the world?
  Not 25 then, not if you're talking of the creative minority. But
  who'd want to be part of the creative minority anyway? Ahead of their
  time, out of step with everyone else, and totally essential. Yuk. And
  never taken seriously. Every peasant village has its innovator
  farmer, he tinkers with stuff, tries it this way and that way and
  finds some better answers, but everyone else laughs at him. But it
  turns out that when their sons grow up and take over they do it the
  tinker's way, and when someone new suggests something different they
  say Naah, you're nuts, this is the way our grandfathers and
  great-grandfathers always did it and it's good enough for us.

Why do people forget that?

Don't know. Maybe it wouldn't work so well otherwise.

My mother was herself arrested in a political
demonstration, yet is deeply horrified that my daughter would expose herself
to the possibility.  Okay, I guess she sees it as a low point in her
political career.

I got arrested too, in a different sort of political demonstration, 
but it's just something that happened.

There's no dishonour in such an arrest. But there's also Rachel 
Corrie, and a hell of a lot of other people. That's something to be 
concerned about.

  When my friends and I started turning about 50 we started saying
  things like this, with some dismay: But the more I learn the less I
  know! LOL! At least it's a bit humble. A guy I worked for once told
  me I'm the sort of person who never stops learning, which kind of
  startled me at the time. He wasn't being nice, he was angry with me.
  With any luck I'll go on knowing less and less until finally I know
  nothing at all - nirvana! It makes you think of the 80% who stop at
  25, maybe it's learning that they stop doing. Well, I have no
  argument with them at all, and it doesn't have to stop them growing
  old and wise, and graceful, it seeps in by osmosis anyway.

Hope so.
 
  Kids, I guess if you just love them it'll all turn out the way it
  should, imsh'allah. But loving them can be really uphill work, they
  can sure be hard to like at times. It probably doesn't matter though
  because the chemo-psychological effects or whatever of the act of
  having them in the first place turns their parents permanently
  somewhat nuts so they go right on loving them anyway no matter what,
  fool me twice doesn't count. It has to work like that or the species
  would have snuffed it at square two, so nature in her infinite wisdom
  provides.

Yup, a world of heartache.  Lots of laughs too, luckily.

 Well, thanks but no thanks nature. Or was it Darwin. FWIW,
  from someone who's been one and determinedly avoided having any ever
  since. Not that I don't like them, of course I like them. But when
  they're being unlikeable I don't have to be there, among other
  advantages. They say people who have children and people who don't
  have children always feel sorry for each other. I think that's really
  funny!

There's certainly regret either way.  The way I heard it, those with
children and those without ENVY each other.

Whoops! There we go.

I see I'll have to explain myself. I love lots of my friends and I 
love their families and their children, but I've never envied anybody 
for having children. Truly, never. No regret, not even a twinge, not 
ever.

To a lot of parents that simply has to mean I just don't understand, 
or that I just won't admit it, unless I'm some kind of inhuman 

Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-14 Thread Keith Addison
Howdy Gustl

Hallo Jesse,

Hey  dere!  So  how's by you, eh? Well, I know a fellow named Mark who
used to live in Manchester, Michigan.

Wednesday, 12 April, 2006, 18:00:11, you wrote:

mm Hi Gustl, Mike,
mm No  one  ever  answers my posts (except Keith, our hero), so I can
mm blithely write on this delightfully off-topic topic.

...snip...

mm Balance  of  idealism  and  practicality  indeed.  But what kid is
mm practical?  Bringing  up  the  question  of  when is it that human
mm beings  become  1)  aware  of their mortaility 2) humbled by it 3)
mm able   to  get  anybody  to  listen  to  them.  I  mean  this  not
mm morphologically, but as a maturity thing.

mm Kids  today!  So  accountable!  Like  THEY have to fix everything.
mm While  listening  to  the  Beatles!!!  (I  have  not criticized my
mm children  on  this,  incidentally, they are still impressed that I
mm know all the words.)

Well,  I  just  arrived home and downloaded my mail and see that Keith
has  already  answered you.  The only things I have to add are that it
is the balance which is of primary importance and I like Frank Sinatra
as  well  as Frank Zappa.

I can't say I like Frank Sinatra. I do like some of his songs though, 
and I enjoyed some of his movies. It's the Frank Sinatra ethos I 
meant really, but I'm sure you got that.

We discussed this before, eh, you and me, or something similar. Now I 
have to add something I wrote underneath, sorry, can't help it. 
Please see below.

Well, I guess I should add that if you want
to hear the best album ever recorded, IMNSHO, try and find Willis Alan
Ramsey.   He  only  made one album and it had his name.  Every song on
the  thing is a winner.

Thankyou!

My taste in music is eclectic in the extreme.

And mine.

We  once  had  to  write an essay on our favorite type of music and it
wouldn't  have  taken me an essay to tell that...good music.  You know
it  when  you  hear  it  even if you don't understand the language the
words  are in or recognize the instruments which are being played. ;o)

Amongst the things it's not is the pre-digested pap that's packaged 
for mass consumption and marketed by the trends industry so the 
merchandising gets leveraged too and so on. There can be exceptions, 
they do say the most beautiful lotus grows in the dirtiest mud, which 
may well be true for a lotus but most things like good soil, and that 
ain't it. Thorny ground.

... even if you don't understand the language the
words  are in or recognize the instruments which are being played. ;o)

Strange you should say that, I want to send you some music that's 
like that. Two different kinds. But I have to get hold of some gear 
first, I'm short of some hardware. Midori turns out to be short of 
the same hardware, we'll do it soon.

Regards

Keith



Hope  you get some other answers brother.  I can't imagine Keith being
the only one to answer any post on this list.  hahaha

Happy Happy,

Gustl
--


Dixie

Hong Kong, 1995

Dixie is the Cantonese word for taxi, but it's not something you 
expect to hear in one. But this one was different -- not dixie 
though, Al Jolson. Al Jolson? In a Hong Kong taxi? Not a radio 
phone-in, not a chat show, not Canto-pop, but Al Jolson?

Toot-toot-tootsie goodbye-yiii...

Must be a reality slip -- it's thin stuff, reality, it's hardly there 
at all really, and it's hardly surprising if it slips sometimes. It's 
an odd feeling, sort of like a headache in the belly, but without the 
ache, and not in the belly -- you find yourself looking at the whole 
thing with deep suspicion, and then you realise you're in a dream, so 
it's okay if the apples are made of cheese and the restaurant just 
turned into a swimming pool and so on, only this time you realise 
you're not in a dream. A bit like the Chinese poet who dreamt he was 
a butterfly, and when he woke up he couldn't decide whether he was a 
man dreaming of being a butterfly or a butterfly dreaming of being a 
man, only I don't think butterflies dream, it would be superfluous.

Toot-toot-tootsie don't cry-yiii... Things shimmered slightly like 
a hologram in an SF movie, then got a grip again. The radio wasn't 
jammed on the wrong channel, the music was coming from a tape, and 
the driver was bobbing his head in time, and sort of bobbing the cab 
through the traffic, also in time.

If you don't get a letter then you'll know I'm in jail... That was 
a good line, I'd forgotten that one. I'd forgotten the song too. I'd 
even forgotten Al Jolson. And I didn't remember liking his singing 
much, but that's what I was doing now in this taxi. The song ended. 
What's the music? I asked.

Al Jolson, said the driver. Good-ah?

Yes. You like the old music?

Yes, modern music, it doesn't, it hasn't got ... I don't like it. I 
like this music. The tape had moved on to orchestral evergreens.

Nice tunes, I said. They are too, that's why they're evergreens, 
even if they aren't Frank Zappa or Beethoven or even Chuck Berry. I 
sometimes leave 

Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-13 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Jesse

Hi Gustl, Mike,
No one ever answers my posts (except Keith, our hero),

Heavens, Jesse, surely you can do better than that, I'm not even my hero! LOL!

so I can blithely
write on this delightfully off-topic topic.

(Off-topic??? Grrr!) Sure, just as long as you're blithe about it.

  From: Gustl Steiner-Zehender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 17:41:59 -0400
  To: Mike Weaver Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
 
  Hallo Mike,
 
  Friday, 07 April, 2006, 20:04:32, you wrote:
 
  MW Uh, Yeah. Dude.
 
  MW We  had  all  these  great ideas, then we got really stoned and it
  MW drifted away.
 
  Actually  brother, money entered the picture and the better portion of
  us  just  melded into the system.  Seems like somehow folks just never
  learned  to  get  the right balance of idealism and practicality.  And
  with all the isms the we became exclusionary rather than inclusive
  and  we  started  down that gradual slope.  It really is a question of
  balance isn't it?

Balance of idealism and practicality indeed.  But what kid is practical?
Bringing up the question of when is it that human beings become 1) aware of
their mortaility  2) humbled by it  3) able to get anybody to listen to
them.

Okay, I'll try, though how would I know...

When it's too late? Or just in time maybe.

This is about the Sixties. Don't trust anyone over 30! they used to 
say in the Sixties. LOL!

But it's a lot easier to get taken seriously after you're 30, 
suddenly you find you don't have to bother about it much anymore. 
Hopefully there's still something left by then. You know the old 
saying: If you're not a liberal when you're 25 there's something 
wrong with you; if you're still a liberal when you're 35 there's 
something wrong with you. But that's the 
if-you-can't-beat-them-join-them school of being taken seriously. 
Psychologists have said 80% or something of people don't show any 
significant further character development after the age of 25. So 
maybe your answer is 25. But idealism? They want to change the world? 
Not 25 then, not if you're talking of the creative minority. But 
who'd want to be part of the creative minority anyway? Ahead of their 
time, out of step with everyone else, and totally essential. Yuk. And 
never taken seriously. Every peasant village has its innovator 
farmer, he tinkers with stuff, tries it this way and that way and 
finds some better answers, but everyone else laughs at him. But it 
turns out that when their sons grow up and take over they do it the 
tinker's way, and when someone new suggests something different they 
say Naah, you're nuts, this is the way our grandfathers and 
great-grandfathers always did it and it's good enough for us.

When my friends and I started turning about 50 we started saying 
things like this, with some dismay: But the more I learn the less I 
know! LOL! At least it's a bit humble. A guy I worked for once told 
me I'm the sort of person who never stops learning, which kind of 
startled me at the time. He wasn't being nice, he was angry with me. 
With any luck I'll go on knowing less and less until finally I know 
nothing at all - nirvana! It makes you think of the 80% who stop at 
25, maybe it's learning that they stop doing. Well, I have no 
argument with them at all, and it doesn't have to stop them growing 
old and wise, and graceful, it seeps in by osmosis anyway.

Kids, I guess if you just love them it'll all turn out the way it 
should, imsh'allah. But loving them can be really uphill work, they 
can sure be hard to like at times. It probably doesn't matter though 
because the chemo-psychological effects or whatever of the act of 
having them in the first place turns their parents permanently 
somewhat nuts so they go right on loving them anyway no matter what, 
fool me twice doesn't count. It has to work like that or the species 
would have snuffed it at square two, so nature in her infinite wisdom 
provides. Well, thanks but no thanks nature. Or was it Darwin. FWIW, 
from someone who's been one and determinedly avoided having any ever 
since. Not that I don't like them, of course I like them. But when 
they're being unlikeable I don't have to be there, among other 
advantages. They say people who have children and people who don't 
have children always feel sorry for each other. I think that's really 
funny!

Kahlil Gibran, also FWIW, wrote that children are the arrows of the 
future, you can give them your love but not your thoughts, they have 
thoughts of their own. Or words to that effect. Whatever, youth is 
definitely wasted on them. :-)

I mean this not morphologically, but as a maturity thing.

Kids today!  So accountable!  Like THEY have to fix everything.  While
listening to the Beatles!!!

LOL! There's hope.

(I have not criticized my children on this,
incidentally, they are still impressed that I know all the words.)

But they do

Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-13 Thread Michael Redler
"Just as long as nobody saves us from Frank Zappa."Yes! Brilliant!I'm liking this thread.:-)Mike"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe."- Frank ZappaKeith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi JesseHi Gustl, Mike,No one ever answers my posts (except Keith, our hero),Heavens,
 Jesse, surely you can do better than that, I'm not even my hero! LOL!so I can blithelywrite on this delightfully off-topic topic.(Off-topic??? Grrr!) Sure, just as long as you're blithe about it.  From: Gustl Steiner-Zehender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org  Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 17:41:59 -0400  To: Mike Weaver <BIOFUEL@SUSTAINABLELISTS.ORG>  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet   Hallo Mike,   Friday, 07 April, 2006, 20:04:32, you wrote:   MW Uh, Yeah. Dude.   MW We had all these great ideas, then we got really stoned and it  MW drifted away.   Actually brother, money entered the picture and the better portion of  us just melded into the system. Seems like somehow folks just
 never  learned to get the right balance of idealism and practicality. And  with all the "isms" the "we" became exclusionary rather than inclusive  and we started down that gradual slope. It really is a question of  balance isn't it?Balance of idealism and practicality indeed. But what kid is practical?Bringing up the question of when is it that human beings become 1) aware oftheir mortaility 2) humbled by it 3) able to get anybody to listen tothem.Okay, I'll try, though how would I know...When it's too late? Or just in time maybe.This is about the Sixties. "Don't trust anyone over 30!" they used to say in the Sixties. LOL!But it's a lot easier to get taken seriously after you're 30, suddenly you find you don't have to bother about it much anymore. Hopefully there's still something left by then. You know the old saying: If you're not a
 liberal when you're 25 there's something wrong with you; if you're still a liberal when you're 35 there's something wrong with you. But that's the if-you-can't-beat-them-join-them school of being taken seriously. Psychologists have said 80% or something of people don't show any significant further character development after the age of 25. So maybe your answer is 25. But idealism? They want to change the world? Not 25 then, not if you're talking of the creative minority. But who'd want to be part of the creative minority anyway? Ahead of their time, out of step with everyone else, and totally essential. Yuk. And never taken seriously. Every peasant village has its innovator farmer, he tinkers with stuff, tries it this way and that way and finds some better answers, but everyone else laughs at him. But it turns out that when their sons grow up and take over they do it the tinker's way, and when someone new suggests
 something different they say Naah, you're nuts, this is the way our grandfathers and great-grandfathers always did it and it's good enough for us.When my friends and I started turning about 50 we started saying things like this, with some dismay: "But the more I learn the less I know!" LOL! At least it's a bit humble. A guy I worked for once told me I'm the sort of person who never stops learning, which kind of startled me at the time. He wasn't being nice, he was angry with me. With any luck I'll go on knowing less and less until finally I know nothing at all - nirvana! It makes you think of the 80% who stop at 25, maybe it's learning that they stop doing. Well, I have no argument with them at all, and it doesn't have to stop them growing old and wise, and graceful, it seeps in by osmosis anyway.Kids, I guess if you just love them it'll all turn out the way it should, imsh'allah. But loving them can be really
 uphill work, they can sure be hard to like at times. It probably doesn't matter though because the chemo-psychological effects or whatever of the act of having them in the first place turns their parents permanently somewhat nuts so they go right on loving them anyway no matter what, fool me twice doesn't count. It has to work like that or the species would have snuffed it at square two, so nature in her infinite wisdom provides. Well, thanks but no thanks nature. Or was it Darwin. FWIW, from someone who's been one and determinedly avoided having any ever since. Not that I don't like them, of course I like them. But when they're being unlikeable I don't have to be there, among other advantages. They say people who have children and people who don't have children always feel sorry for each other. I think that's really funny!Kahlil Gibran, also FWIW, wrote that children are the arrows of the future, you can give
 them your love but not your thoughts, they have thoughts of 

Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-13 Thread mark manchester
Hi Keith!

 From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:40:07 +0900
 To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
 
 Hi Jesse
 
 Hi Gustl, Mike,
 No one ever answers my posts (except Keith, our hero),
 
 Heavens, Jesse, surely you can do better than that, I'm not even my hero! LOL!
 
 so I can blithely
 write on this delightfully off-topic topic.
 
 (Off-topic??? Grrr!) Sure, just as long as you're blithe about it.

I see your Grrr!  What, the care and future of the planet is not off-topic,
eh?  Good point.  I guess I was confining my thinking to the Title.
 
 From: Gustl Steiner-Zehender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 17:41:59 -0400
 To: Mike Weaver Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
 
 Hallo Mike,
 
 Friday, 07 April, 2006, 20:04:32, you wrote:
 
 MW Uh, Yeah. Dude.
 
 MW We  had  all  these  great ideas, then we got really stoned and it
 MW drifted away.
 
 Actually  brother, money entered the picture and the better portion of
 us  just  melded into the system.  Seems like somehow folks just never
 learned  to  get  the right balance of idealism and practicality.  And
 with all the isms the we became exclusionary rather than inclusive
 and  we  started  down that gradual slope.  It really is a question of
 balance isn't it?
 
 Balance of idealism and practicality indeed.  But what kid is practical?
 Bringing up the question of when is it that human beings become 1) aware of
 their mortaility  2) humbled by it  3) able to get anybody to listen to
 them.
 
 Okay, I'll try, though how would I know...
 
 When it's too late? Or just in time maybe.

This is IMHE the prevailing feeling among very many 20-somethings.  A sort
of terrible urgency, bordering on despair.
 
 This is about the Sixties. Don't trust anyone over 30! they used to
 say in the Sixties. LOL!
 
 But it's a lot easier to get taken seriously after you're 30,
 suddenly you find you don't have to bother about it much anymore.
 Hopefully there's still something left by then. You know the old
 saying: If you're not a liberal when you're 25 there's something
 wrong with you; if you're still a liberal when you're 35 there's
 something wrong with you. But that's the
 if-you-can't-beat-them-join-them school of being taken seriously.

Yes, the hard line.

 Psychologists have said 80% or something of people don't show any
 significant further character development after the age of 25. So
 maybe your answer is 25. But idealism? They want to change the world?
 Not 25 then, not if you're talking of the creative minority. But
 who'd want to be part of the creative minority anyway? Ahead of their
 time, out of step with everyone else, and totally essential. Yuk. And
 never taken seriously. Every peasant village has its innovator
 farmer, he tinkers with stuff, tries it this way and that way and
 finds some better answers, but everyone else laughs at him. But it
 turns out that when their sons grow up and take over they do it the
 tinker's way, and when someone new suggests something different they
 say Naah, you're nuts, this is the way our grandfathers and
 great-grandfathers always did it and it's good enough for us.

Why do people forget that?  My mother was herself arrested in a political
demonstration, yet is deeply horrified that my daughter would expose herself
to the possibility.  Okay, I guess she sees it as a low point in her
political career.
 
 When my friends and I started turning about 50 we started saying
 things like this, with some dismay: But the more I learn the less I
 know! LOL! At least it's a bit humble. A guy I worked for once told
 me I'm the sort of person who never stops learning, which kind of
 startled me at the time. He wasn't being nice, he was angry with me.
 With any luck I'll go on knowing less and less until finally I know
 nothing at all - nirvana! It makes you think of the 80% who stop at
 25, maybe it's learning that they stop doing. Well, I have no
 argument with them at all, and it doesn't have to stop them growing
 old and wise, and graceful, it seeps in by osmosis anyway.

Hope so.
 
 Kids, I guess if you just love them it'll all turn out the way it
 should, imsh'allah. But loving them can be really uphill work, they
 can sure be hard to like at times. It probably doesn't matter though
 because the chemo-psychological effects or whatever of the act of
 having them in the first place turns their parents permanently
 somewhat nuts so they go right on loving them anyway no matter what,
 fool me twice doesn't count. It has to work like that or the species
 would have snuffed it at square two, so nature in her infinite wisdom
 provides. 

Yup, a world of heartache.  Lots of laughs too, luckily.

Well, thanks but no thanks nature. Or was it Darwin. FWIW,
 from someone who's been one and determinedly avoided

Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-13 Thread Gustl Steiner-Zehender
Hallo Jesse,

Hey  dere!  So  how's by you, eh? Well, I know a fellow named Mark who
used to live in Manchester, Michigan.

Wednesday, 12 April, 2006, 18:00:11, you wrote:

mm Hi Gustl, Mike,
mm No  one  ever  answers my posts (except Keith, our hero), so I can
mm blithely write on this delightfully off-topic topic.

...snip...

mm Balance  of  idealism  and  practicality  indeed.  But what kid is
mm practical?  Bringing  up  the  question  of  when is it that human
mm beings  become  1)  aware  of their mortaility 2) humbled by it 3)
mm able   to  get  anybody  to  listen  to  them.  I  mean  this  not
mm morphologically, but as a maturity thing.

mm Kids  today!  So  accountable!  Like  THEY have to fix everything.
mm While  listening  to  the  Beatles!!!  (I  have  not criticized my
mm children  on  this,  incidentally, they are still impressed that I
mm know all the words.)

Well,  I  just  arrived home and downloaded my mail and see that Keith
has  already  answered you.  The only things I have to add are that it
is the balance which is of primary importance and I like Frank Sinatra
as  well  as Frank Zappa.  Well, I guess I should add that if you want
to hear the best album ever recorded, IMNSHO, try and find Willis Alan
Ramsey.   He  only  made one album and it had his name.  Every song on
the  thing is a winner.  My taste in music is eclectic in the extreme.
We  once  had  to  write an essay on our favorite type of music and it
wouldn't  have  taken me an essay to tell that...good music.  You know
it  when  you  hear  it  even if you don't understand the language the
words  are in or recognize the instruments which are being played. ;o)

Hope  you get some other answers brother.  I can't imagine Keith being
the only one to answer any post on this list.  hahaha

Happy Happy,

Gustl
-- 
Je mehr wir haben, desto mehr fordert Gott von uns.

We can't change the winds but we can adjust our sails.

The safest road to Hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope, 
soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, 
without signposts.  
C. S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters

Es gibt Wahrheiten, die so sehr auf der Straße liegen, 
daß sie gerade deshalb von der gewöhnlichen Welt nicht 
gesehen oder wenigstens nicht erkannt werden.

Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't
hear the music.  
George Carlin

The best portion of a good man's life -
His little, nameless, unremembered acts of kindness and of love.
William Wordsworth



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-13 Thread Michael Gian


 -Original Message-
From:   mark manchester

snip
My Grandmother was sent to a convent when she was four, and never came back!

Grandpa? A priest?

GASOH,
Michael


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-12 Thread Terry Dyck
A back to the sixties theme with environmental musicians like the Rolling 
Stones, Bruce Cockburn, Paul McCartney, Sting and probably many other famous 
people (environmental artists) could bring a lot of attention to the urgency 
of slowing down global warming.  It could be in the form of a huge concert 
or a recording similar to We are the World.


Terry Dyck



From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 19:50:56 +0900

Hi Gustl, Mike

But it didn't drift away. Some people did, a lot of them, but it went
on happening anyway. A lot of people didn't change, and a lot of
those didn't get stuck in an old rut either, even if all the Rolling
Stone ads were for Porsche and Bang  Olefson these days. It got
splintered too, but it never quite lost its cohesion, nor sight of
its basic tenets, and it didn't just moulder, it picked up new people
on the way. In quite a lot of ways it grew and matured. After all,
there was something there ready to happen at Seattle in 1999. And
since. Not quite the same as the sixties but not essentially
different either.

I think it made its mark on everyone involved, to a small or large
extent their lives were differently focused and differently informed
afterwards. It made its mark on everything, it's part of everyone's
heritage. (Even if they didn't inhale!)

And here we are in a global village discussing it, using Ivan
Illich's learning web, FCOL, and talking quite a lot about the other
superpower. The sixties isn't dead, it doesn't even smell bad. Too
soon to tell if it was (is) a success or a failure as alleged, but it
looks pretty good to me. It's about the only thing that does. Hang in
there, keep on trucking! Don't trust anyone over 30! ROFL!!

Not a bummer - happy happy!

Best

Keith


Hallo Mike,

Friday, 07 April, 2006, 20:04:32, you wrote:

MW Uh, Yeah. Dude.

MW We  had  all  these  great ideas, then we got really stoned and it
MW drifted away.

Actually  brother, money entered the picture and the better portion of
us  just  melded into the system.  Seems like somehow folks just never
learned  to  get  the right balance of idealism and practicality.  And
with all the isms the we became exclusionary rather than inclusive
and  we  started  down that gradual slope.  It really is a question of
balance isn't it?

MW Then it was the 80's.

And here they slowly come again.

MW Bummer

Far out...

Happy Happy,

Gustl
...snip...
--
Je mehr wir haben, desto mehr fordert Gott von uns.

We can't change the winds but we can adjust our sails.

The safest road to Hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope,
soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones,
without signposts.
C. S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters

Es gibt Wahrheiten, die so sehr auf der Straße liegen,
daß sie gerade deshalb von der gewöhnlichen Welt nicht
gesehen oder wenigstens nicht erkannt werden.

Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't
hear the music.
George Carlin

The best portion of a good man's life -
His little, nameless, unremembered acts of kindness and of love.
William Wordsworth


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/





___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-12 Thread mark manchester
Hi Gustl, Mike,
No one ever answers my posts (except Keith, our hero), so I can blithely
write on this delightfully off-topic topic.

 From: Gustl Steiner-Zehender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 17:41:59 -0400
 To: Mike Weaver Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
 
 Hallo Mike,
 
 Friday, 07 April, 2006, 20:04:32, you wrote:
 
 MW Uh, Yeah. Dude.
 
 MW We  had  all  these  great ideas, then we got really stoned and it
 MW drifted away.
 
 Actually  brother, money entered the picture and the better portion of
 us  just  melded into the system.  Seems like somehow folks just never
 learned  to  get  the right balance of idealism and practicality.  And
 with all the isms the we became exclusionary rather than inclusive
 and  we  started  down that gradual slope.  It really is a question of
 balance isn't it?

Balance of idealism and practicality indeed.  But what kid is practical?
Bringing up the question of when is it that human beings become 1) aware of
their mortaility  2) humbled by it  3) able to get anybody to listen to
them.  I mean this not morphologically, but as a maturity thing.

Kids today!  So accountable!  Like THEY have to fix everything.  While
listening to the Beatles!!!  (I have not criticized my children on this,
incidentally, they are still impressed that I know all the words.)
 
 MW Then it was the 80's.
 
 And here they slowly come again.
 
 MW Bummer
 
 Far out...

We're just hoping to be helpful, eh?  (as we say in Canada, crap, we really
DO say that in Canada.)  Cheers, Jesse
 
 Happy Happy,
 
 Gustl
 ...snip...
 -- 
 Je mehr wir haben, desto mehr fordert Gott von uns.
 
 We can't change the winds but we can adjust our sails.
 
 The safest road to Hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope,
 soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones,
 without signposts.
 C. S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters
 
 Es gibt Wahrheiten, die so sehr auf der Straße liegen,
 daß sie gerade deshalb von der gewöhnlichen Welt nicht
 gesehen oder wenigstens nicht erkannt werden.
 
 Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't
 hear the music.  
 George Carlin
 
 The best portion of a good man's life -
 His little, nameless, unremembered acts of kindness and of love.
 William Wordsworth

 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-09 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Gustl, Mike

But it didn't drift away. Some people did, a lot of them, but it went 
on happening anyway. A lot of people didn't change, and a lot of 
those didn't get stuck in an old rut either, even if all the Rolling 
Stone ads were for Porsche and Bang  Olefson these days. It got 
splintered too, but it never quite lost its cohesion, nor sight of 
its basic tenets, and it didn't just moulder, it picked up new people 
on the way. In quite a lot of ways it grew and matured. After all, 
there was something there ready to happen at Seattle in 1999. And 
since. Not quite the same as the sixties but not essentially 
different either.

I think it made its mark on everyone involved, to a small or large 
extent their lives were differently focused and differently informed 
afterwards. It made its mark on everything, it's part of everyone's 
heritage. (Even if they didn't inhale!)

And here we are in a global village discussing it, using Ivan 
Illich's learning web, FCOL, and talking quite a lot about the other 
superpower. The sixties isn't dead, it doesn't even smell bad. Too 
soon to tell if it was (is) a success or a failure as alleged, but it 
looks pretty good to me. It's about the only thing that does. Hang in 
there, keep on trucking! Don't trust anyone over 30! ROFL!!

Not a bummer - happy happy!

Best

Keith


Hallo Mike,

Friday, 07 April, 2006, 20:04:32, you wrote:

MW Uh, Yeah. Dude.

MW We  had  all  these  great ideas, then we got really stoned and it
MW drifted away.

Actually  brother, money entered the picture and the better portion of
us  just  melded into the system.  Seems like somehow folks just never
learned  to  get  the right balance of idealism and practicality.  And
with all the isms the we became exclusionary rather than inclusive
and  we  started  down that gradual slope.  It really is a question of
balance isn't it?

MW Then it was the 80's.

And here they slowly come again.

MW Bummer

Far out...

Happy Happy,

Gustl
...snip...
--
Je mehr wir haben, desto mehr fordert Gott von uns.

We can't change the winds but we can adjust our sails.

The safest road to Hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope,
soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones,
without signposts.
C. S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters

Es gibt Wahrheiten, die so sehr auf der Straße liegen,
daß sie gerade deshalb von der gewöhnlichen Welt nicht
gesehen oder wenigstens nicht erkannt werden.

Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't
hear the music.
George Carlin

The best portion of a good man's life -
His little, nameless, unremembered acts of kindness and of love.
William Wordsworth


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-08 Thread Gustl Steiner-Zehender
Hallo Mike,

Friday, 07 April, 2006, 20:04:32, you wrote:

MW Uh, Yeah. Dude.

MW We  had  all  these  great ideas, then we got really stoned and it
MW drifted away.

Actually  brother, money entered the picture and the better portion of
us  just  melded into the system.  Seems like somehow folks just never
learned  to  get  the right balance of idealism and practicality.  And
with all the isms the we became exclusionary rather than inclusive
and  we  started  down that gradual slope.  It really is a question of
balance isn't it?

MW Then it was the 80's.

And here they slowly come again.

MW Bummer

Far out...

Happy Happy,

Gustl
...snip...
-- 
Je mehr wir haben, desto mehr fordert Gott von uns.

We can't change the winds but we can adjust our sails.

The safest road to Hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope, 
soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, 
without signposts.  
C. S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters

Es gibt Wahrheiten, die so sehr auf der Straße liegen, 
daß sie gerade deshalb von der gewöhnlichen Welt nicht 
gesehen oder wenigstens nicht erkannt werden.

Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't
hear the music.  
George Carlin

The best portion of a good man's life -
His little, nameless, unremembered acts of kindness and of love.
William Wordsworth



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-07 Thread Michael Redler
Yes! Yes! Yes!...where's my Uncle Sam suit?!Seriously,the return toa healthy counter-culture would be a really good thing (not that I remember the sixties).There are a few, less noticeable signs ofa government with too much power, bent on bringing "order" to the world and how it's messing withyour quality of life.This is my short list:1.) Too many laws:There are over 4000US federal laws - enough to make youwonder if you are breaking one right now and ifyou are dislikedenoughto have it enforced.2.) All the songs on the radio suck because too many artists listen to the sound of a cash register instead of their humanity. I haven't found a connection to the government yet but, I think that artists reflect the culture around them which might explain
 it's occurrence.3.) Everybody is scared but nobody can provide a good example to show why.  MikeKeith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  http://www.alternet.org/story/33896/Bring the Sixties Out of the ClosetBy Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted March 23, 2006.We need to resurrect the good '60s -- a time when acting, despite being messy and imperfect, made a lot of good things happen.Photo courtesy of David Fenton, from his book Shots, published by Ten Speed Press.Late into Dana Spiotta's brilliant new novel, "Eat the Document," the protagonist, a woman who has lived "underground" for years, hiding from the consequences of a 1960s political protest gone badly awry, flashes back to the moment of
 choice:"The question is, do we want to leave action to the brutes of the world? Š There are some inherent problems built into acting. It lacks perfection. But I believe we must fight back, or we will feel shame all our lives. We, the privileged, are more obligated. It is a moral duty to do something, however imperfect. Š If we don't do something, all our lives we will feel regret."Lately, I've been thinking a lot about the '60s (actually the period from '67 to '73) -- that political era so filled with possibility, so much a part of the blood and souls of millions of aging baby boomers like myself. The period was profoundly effective in the changes it provoked, yet is so persistently pilloried for its exaggerated excesses. One reason I find myself looking back is the pervasive feeling of political impotence so many of us feel at this moment in history, and our seeming inability to act -- to be noticed, to make
 a difference.There are some present-day chilling parallels to the repression of the Nixon era -- and of course many differences -- but there is a feeling in the air that smells like the '60s, that sends paranoid vibes through the body politic. The events taking place -- warrantless wiretapping, political corruption, torture, the war in Iraq with its disgusting profiteering while tens of thousands of people die -- demand a response equal to the situation, Yet we sit without a clear path showing us our step.A short time ago, in a funding appeal to the AlterNet community, I wrote: "I haven't felt this angry, frightened or radical in a long time. We can no longer just do what we have been doing. In my several decades working in politics and media, the present feels dire."Those were my emotions; however, I didn't offer an action plan. The best I could do was ask for support so AlterNet could continue being
 a thorn in the side of the Bush administration. Important, but not sufficient.In the first draft of my appeal letter, I had also written: "Not since John Mitchell was attorney general and a paranoid, anti-Semitic Richard Nixon at the helm, have we been under an assault close to what we have today. And we don't have a Watergate to get Bush out of office." My editor suggested I take those sentences out -- "No need to go back to the past, and younger readers probably won't relate to this piece of history," she said. So I did.But my memory of that time is still so powerful, because many of us did act -- sometimes wildly, sometimes irresponsibly -- and we couldn't be ignored. And who can say that the Bush administration isn't shockingly irresponsible every day?I remember so clearly the May Day 1971 protests in Washington, D.C., glaring at Attorney General John Mitchell as he stood on the roof of the
 Justice Department, puffing his ever-present pipe and pretending to ignore the thousands of screaming, chanting masses in the street. The WikiPedia describes May 3, 1971, as "one of the most disruptive actions of the Vietnam War era."The threat caused by the May Day Protests forced the Nixon administration to create a virtual state of siege in the nation's capital. Thousands of federal and National Guard troops, along with local police, suppressed the disorder, and by the time it was over several days later, over 10,000 would be arrested. It would be the largest mass arrest in U.S. history.That's not a typo: More than 10,000 people were arrested, jammed into jails that resembled crowded elevators and bused out to RFK Stadium. It was crazy, anarchistic and 

Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-04-07 Thread Mike Weaver
Uh, Yeah. Dude.

We had all these great ideas, then we got really stoned and it drifted away.

Then it was the 80's.

Bummer

Michael Redler wrote:

 Yes! Yes! Yes!
 ...where's my Uncle Sam suit?!
 Seriously, the return to a healthy counter-culture would be a really 
 good thing (not that I remember the sixties).
 There are a few, less noticeable signs of a government with too much 
 power, bent on bringing order to the world and how it's messing with 
 your quality of life. This is my short list:
 1.) Too many laws: There are over 4000 US federal laws - enough to 
 make you wonder if you are breaking one right now and if you are 
 disliked enough to have it enforced.
 2.) All the songs on the radio suck because too many artists listen to 
 the sound of a cash register instead of their humanity. I haven't 
 found a connection to the government yet but, I think that artists 
 reflect the culture around them which might explain it's occurrence.
 3.) Everybody is scared but nobody can provide a good example to show why.
 Mike

 */Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:

 http://www.alternet.org/story/33896/

 Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

 By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted March 23, 2006.

 We need to resurrect the good '60s -- a time when acting, despite
 being messy and imperfect, made a lot of good things happen.

 Photo courtesy of David Fenton, from his book Shots, published by Ten
 Speed Press.

 Late into Dana Spiotta's brilliant new novel, Eat the Document, the
 protagonist, a woman who has lived underground for years, hiding
 from the consequences of a 1960s political protest gone badly awry,
 flashes back to the moment of choice:

 The question is, do we want to leave action to the brutes of the
 world? Š There are some inherent problems built into acting. It lacks
 perfection. But I believe we must fight back, or we will feel shame
 all our lives. We, the privileged, are more obligated. It is a moral
 duty to do something, however imperfect. Š If we don't do something,
 all our lives we will feel regret.

 Lately, I've been thinking a lot about the '60s (actually the period
 from '67 to '73) -- that political era so filled with possibility, so
 much a part of the blood and souls of millions of aging baby boomers
 like myself. The period was profoundly effective in the changes it
 provoked, yet is so persistently pilloried for its exaggerated
 excesses. One reason I find myself looking back is the pervasive
 feeling of political impotence so many of us feel at this moment in
 history, and our seeming inability to act -- to be noticed, to make a
 difference.

 There are some present-day chilling parallels to the repression of
 the Nixon era -- and of course many differences -- but there is a
 feeling in the air that smells like the '60s, that sends paranoid
 vibes through the body politic. The events taking place --
 warrantless wiretapping, political corruption, torture, the war in
 Iraq with its disgusting profiteering while tens of thousands of
 people die -- demand a response equal to the situation, Yet we sit
 without a clear path showing us our step.

 A short time ago, in a funding appeal to the AlterNet community, I
 wrote: I haven't felt this angry, frightened or radical in a long
 time. We can no longer just do what we have been doing. In my several
 decades working in politics and media, the present feels dire.

 Those were my emotions; however, I didn't offer an action plan. The
 best I could do was ask for support so AlterNet could continue being
 a thorn in the side of the Bush administration. Important, but not
 sufficient.

 In the first draft of my appeal letter, I had also written: Not
 since John Mitchell was attorney general and a paranoid, anti-Semitic
 Richard Nixon at the helm, have we been under an assault close to
 what we have today. And we don't have a Watergate to get Bush out of
 office. My editor suggested I take those sentences out -- No need
 to go back to the past, and younger readers probably won't relate to
 this piece of history, she said. So I did.

 But my memory of that time is still so powerful, because many of us
 did act -- sometimes wildly, sometimes irresponsibly -- and we
 couldn't be ignored. And who can say that the Bush administration
 isn't shockingly irresponsible every day?

 I remember so clearly the May Day 1971 protests in Washington, D.C.,
 glaring at Attorney General John Mitchell as he stood on the roof of
 the Justice Department, puffing his ever-present pipe and pretending
 to ignore the thousands of screaming, chanting masses in the street.
 The WikiPedia describes May 3, 1971, as one of the most disruptive
 actions of the Vietnam War era.

 The threat caused by the May Day Protests forced the Nixon
 

[Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-03-27 Thread Keith Addison
http://www.alternet.org/story/33896/

Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted March 23, 2006.

We need to resurrect the good '60s -- a time when acting, despite 
being messy and imperfect, made a lot of good things happen.

Photo courtesy of David Fenton, from his book Shots, published by Ten 
Speed Press.

Late into Dana Spiotta's brilliant new novel, Eat the Document, the 
protagonist, a woman who has lived underground for years, hiding 
from the consequences of a 1960s political protest gone badly awry, 
flashes back to the moment of choice:

The question is, do we want to leave action to the brutes of the 
world? Š There are some inherent problems built into acting. It lacks 
perfection. But I believe we must fight back, or we will feel shame 
all our lives. We, the privileged, are more obligated. It is a moral 
duty to do something, however imperfect. Š If we don't do something, 
all our lives we will feel regret.

Lately, I've been thinking a lot about the '60s (actually the period 
from '67 to '73) -- that political era so filled with possibility, so 
much a part of the blood and souls of millions of aging baby boomers 
like myself. The period was profoundly effective in the changes it 
provoked, yet is so persistently pilloried for its exaggerated 
excesses. One reason I find myself looking back is the pervasive 
feeling of political impotence so many of us feel at this moment in 
history, and our seeming inability to act -- to be noticed, to make a 
difference.

There are some present-day chilling parallels to the repression of 
the Nixon era -- and of course many differences -- but there is a 
feeling in the air that smells like the '60s, that sends paranoid 
vibes through the body politic. The events taking place -- 
warrantless wiretapping, political corruption, torture, the war in 
Iraq with its disgusting profiteering while tens of thousands of 
people die -- demand a response equal to the situation, Yet we sit 
without a clear path showing us our step.

A short time ago, in a funding appeal to the AlterNet community, I 
wrote: I haven't felt this angry, frightened or radical in a long 
time. We can no longer just do what we have been doing. In my several 
decades working in politics and media, the present feels dire.

Those were my emotions; however, I didn't offer an action plan. The 
best I could do was ask for support so AlterNet could continue being 
a thorn in the side of the Bush administration. Important, but not 
sufficient.

In the first draft of my appeal letter, I had also written: Not 
since John Mitchell was attorney general and a paranoid, anti-Semitic 
Richard Nixon at the helm, have we been under an assault close to 
what we have today. And we don't have a Watergate to get Bush out of 
office. My editor suggested I take those sentences out -- No need 
to go back to the past, and younger readers probably won't relate to 
this piece of history, she said. So I did.

But my memory of that time is still so powerful, because many of us 
did act -- sometimes wildly, sometimes irresponsibly -- and we 
couldn't be ignored. And who can say that the Bush administration 
isn't shockingly irresponsible every day?

I remember so clearly the May Day 1971 protests in Washington, D.C., 
glaring at Attorney General John Mitchell as he stood on the roof of 
the Justice Department, puffing his ever-present pipe and pretending 
to ignore the thousands of screaming, chanting masses in the street. 
The WikiPedia describes May 3, 1971, as one of the most disruptive 
actions of the Vietnam War era.

The threat caused by the May Day Protests forced the Nixon 
administration to create a virtual state of siege in the nation's 
capital. Thousands of federal and National Guard troops, along with 
local police, suppressed the disorder, and by the time it was over 
several days later, over 10,000 would be arrested. It would be the 
largest mass arrest in U.S. history.

That's not a typo: More than 10,000 people were arrested, jammed into 
jails that resembled crowded elevators and bused out to RFK Stadium. 
It was crazy, anarchistic and perhaps politically naive, but it was 
action. It made an impression. We were noticed. And it was 
exhilarating to bond with so many in a cause that felt so just. 
Critics may suggest that the protest made things worse, that it 
played into the hands of the Republicans. But I don't think so. 
Resistance is important. (There is a parallel today, with some 
critics charging that talk of impeaching Bush and Sen. Russ 
Feingold's motion to censure are also counterproductive.)

The '60s era was a profoundly energetic mix of culture and politics. 
That decade has been distorted, caricatured and turned into a 
black-and-white cartoon -- when not appropriated to sell cars with 
Jimmy Hendrix music and pricey clothing like the Miss Sixty line.

It is time to resurrect the good '60s and help many people understand 
much of what has been hidden. It was an 

Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-03-27 Thread Jack Schwartz


 From Keith Addison:


http://www.alternet.org/story/33896/
Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted March 23, 2006.
skip to quote from Hazen's article

Lately, I've been thinking a lot about the '60s (actually the
period 
from '67 to '73) -- that political era so filled with possibility, so 
much a part of the blood and souls of millions of aging baby boomers 
like myself. The period was profoundly effective in the changes it 
provoked, yet is so persistently pilloried for its exaggerated 
excesses.
This brings back a wave of nostalgia for me. I am 66 years old
and from the so-called silent generation that preceded the
baby boomers, but in 1972 this Oklahoman found himself campaigning for
George McGovern on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. McGovern lost
to Nixon after which I was in a peaceful march on Washington with about
200,000 people coming in buses from up and down the East Coast on January
20, 1973, the day of Nixon's second inaugural. Our march was a
counter-event to the Nixon inauguration. We were civil and at the
Washington Monument we heard dignified speeches from Senator Philip Hart,
Rep. Bella Abzug, songs and speaking from Pete Seeger, etc. But in
a typical 60's way, our day was cut short when Washington police on
horseback scarily rode at fast gait though our group - breaking it up -
in an overreaction to a few extremists, not with our group, burning some
of the flags that surround the Washington Monument.
 -- Jack


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet

2006-03-27 Thread Keith Addison
From Keith Addison:

http://www.alternet.org/story/33896/
Bring the Sixties Out of the Closet
By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted March 23, 2006.
skip to quote from Hazen's article


Lately, I've been thinking a lot about the '60s (actually the period
 from '67 to '73) -- that political era so filled with possibility, so
 much a part of the blood and souls of millions of aging baby boomers
 like myself. The period was profoundly effective in the changes it
 provoked, yet is so persistently pilloried for its exaggerated
 excesses.

This brings back a wave of nostalgia for me.

And for me Jack. I wasn't in the US, but I was in quite a lot of 
other interesting places. It was a global phenomenon, the first 
Global Village maybe. I think it could only have started in the US 
though, no US no Sixties.

Not just nostalgia though because it never really ended, or at least 
not for me. I must say I agree with Don Hazen. Several people have 
been making similar sorts of noises round here recently. It was messy 
enough, as Hazen says, gosh. But how could it not have been? As he 
says it was profoundly effective in the changes it provoked, I'm 
sure that's right, despite the common fallacy that it failed. It 
didn't die either. Hazen says it should come out of the closet, not 
out of its coffin. I think what it was short of was the Internet, and 
a lot of those people are still around, they didn't stop, and now 
they use the Internet too.

I am 66 years old and from the so-called silent generation that 
preceded the baby boomers, but in 1972 this Oklahoman found himself 
campaigning for George McGovern on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. 
McGovern lost to Nixon after which I was in a peaceful march on 
Washington with about 200,000 people coming in buses from up and 
down the East Coast on January 20, 1973, the day of Nixon's second 
inaugural.  Our march was a counter-event to the Nixon inauguration. 
We were civil and at the Washington Monument we heard dignified 
speeches from Senator Philip Hart, Rep. Bella Abzug, songs and 
speaking from Pete Seeger, etc.  But in a typical 60's way, our day 
was cut short when Washington police on horseback scarily rode at 
fast gait though our group - breaking it up - in an overreaction to 
a few extremists, not with our group, burning some of the flags that 
surround the Washington Monument.
  -- Jack

Nice, Jack! Hazen quotes the Sixties fugitive saying If we don't do 
something, all our lives we will feel regret. No regrets!

All best

Keith




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/