Re: [Biofuel] Democracy in chains

2006-07-02 Thread Ken Riznyk
Hey, the repugs won't need to purge any voters here in
Pennsylvania. Incredibly the PA legislature banned the
use of voting machines that keep a paper trail of vote
counts. We will be using touch screen voting machines
that are easily hacked. There will be no recounts,
just people scratching their heads wondering why exit
polls don't match up with the election results.
Ken

--- Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/greg_palast/2006/06/voting_rights_
 
 act_nailed_to_bu.html
 
 Democracy in chains
 
 US Republicans are planning to change the law to
 stop black, Hispanic 
 and Native American voters going to the polls in
 2008.
 
 Greg Palast
 
 June 23, 2006 05:03 PM
 
 Don't kid yourself: the Republican party's decision
 yesterday to 
 delay the renewal of the Voting Rights Act has not
 a darn thing to 
 do with objections of the Republican's white sheets
 caucus.
 
 Complaints by a couple of good ol' boys to
 legislation have never 
 stopped the GOP leadership from rolling over
 dissenters.
 
 This is a strategic stall that is meant to
 decriminalise the 
 Republican party's new game of challenging voters of
 colour by the 
 hundreds of thousands.
 
 In the 2004 presidential race, the GOP ran a
 massive, multi-state, 
 multimillion-dollar operation to challenge the
 legitimacy of black, 
 Hispanic and Native American voters. The methods
 used breached the 
 Voting Rights Act, and while the Bush
 administration's civil rights 
 division grinned and looked the other way, civil
 rights lawyers began 
 circling, preparing to sue to stop the violations of
 the act before 
 the 2008 race.
 
 So Republicans have promised to no longer break the
 law - not by 
 going legit but by eliminating the law.
 
 The act was passed in 1965 after the Ku Klux Klan
 and other upright 
 citizens found they could use procedural tricks -
 literacy tests, 
 poll taxes and more - to block citizens of colour
 from casting 
 ballots.
 
 Here is what happened in 2004, and what's in store
 for 2008.
 
 In the 2004 election, more than 3 million voters
 were challenged at 
 the polls. No one had seen anything like it since
 the era of Jim Crow 
 and burning crosses. In 2004, voters were told their
 registrations 
 had been purged or that their addresses were
 suspect.
 
 Denied the right to the regular voting booths, these
 challenged 
 voters were given provisional ballots. More than
 1m of these 
 provisional ballots (1,090,729 of them) were tossed
 in the electoral 
 dumpster uncounted.
 
 A funny thing about those ballots: about 88% were
 cast by minority voters.
 
 This isn't a number dropped on me from a black
 helicopter: they come 
 from the raw data of the US election assistance
 commission in 
 Washington DC.
 
 At the heart of the GOP's mass challenge of voters
 was what the 
 party's top brass called caging lists - secret
 files of hundreds of 
 thousands of voters, almost every one from a
 black-majority voting 
 precinct.
 
 When our investigations team, working for BBC TV,
 got our hands on 
 these confidential files in October 2004, the
 Republicans told us the 
 voters listed were their potential donors. Really?
 The sheets 
 included pages of men from homeless shelters in
 Florida.
 
 Donor lists, my ass. Every expert told us, these
 were challenge 
 lists meant to stop these black voters from casting
 ballots.
 
 When these caged voters arrived at the polls in
 November 2004, they 
 found their registrations missing, their right to
 vote blocked or 
 their absentee ballots rejected because their
 addresses were 
 supposedly fraudulent.
 
 Why didn't the GOP honchos fess up to challenging
 these allegedly 
 illegal voters? Because targeting voters of colour
 is against the 
 law. The law in question is the Voting Rights Act of
 1965.
 
 The act says you can't go after groups of voters if
 you choose your 
 targets based on race. Given that almost all the
 voters on the GOP 
 hit list are black, the illegal racial profiling is
 beyond even Karl 
 Rove's ability to come up with an alibi.
 
 The Republicans target black folk not because they
 don't like the 
 colour of their skin; they don't like the colour of
 their vote: 
 Democrat. For that reason, the GOP included on its
 hit list Jewish 
 retirement homes in Florida. Apparently, the GOP was
 also gunning for 
 the Elderly of Zion.
 
 These so-called fraudulent voters, in fact, were
 not fraudulent at 
 all. Page after page, as we have previously
 reported, are black 
 soldiers sent overseas. The Bush campaign used their
 absence from 
 their US homes to accuse them of voting from false
 addresses.
 
 Now that the GOP has been caught breaking the voting
 rights law, it 
 has found a way to keep using its expensively
 obtained caging 
 lists: let the law expire next year. If the Voting
 Rights Act dies in 
 2007, the 2008 race will be open season on
 dark-skinned voters. Only 
 the renewal of the Voting Rights Act can prevent the
 

[Biofuel] Democracy in chains

2006-06-24 Thread Keith Addison
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/greg_palast/2006/06/voting_rights_ 
act_nailed_to_bu.html

Democracy in chains

US Republicans are planning to change the law to stop black, Hispanic 
and Native American voters going to the polls in 2008.

Greg Palast

June 23, 2006 05:03 PM

Don't kid yourself: the Republican party's decision yesterday to 
delay the renewal of the Voting Rights Act has not a darn thing to 
do with objections of the Republican's white sheets caucus.

Complaints by a couple of good ol' boys to legislation have never 
stopped the GOP leadership from rolling over dissenters.

This is a strategic stall that is meant to decriminalise the 
Republican party's new game of challenging voters of colour by the 
hundreds of thousands.

In the 2004 presidential race, the GOP ran a massive, multi-state, 
multimillion-dollar operation to challenge the legitimacy of black, 
Hispanic and Native American voters. The methods used breached the 
Voting Rights Act, and while the Bush administration's civil rights 
division grinned and looked the other way, civil rights lawyers began 
circling, preparing to sue to stop the violations of the act before 
the 2008 race.

So Republicans have promised to no longer break the law - not by 
going legit but by eliminating the law.

The act was passed in 1965 after the Ku Klux Klan and other upright 
citizens found they could use procedural tricks - literacy tests, 
poll taxes and more - to block citizens of colour from casting 
ballots.

Here is what happened in 2004, and what's in store for 2008.

In the 2004 election, more than 3 million voters were challenged at 
the polls. No one had seen anything like it since the era of Jim Crow 
and burning crosses. In 2004, voters were told their registrations 
had been purged or that their addresses were suspect.

Denied the right to the regular voting booths, these challenged 
voters were given provisional ballots. More than 1m of these 
provisional ballots (1,090,729 of them) were tossed in the electoral 
dumpster uncounted.

A funny thing about those ballots: about 88% were cast by minority voters.

This isn't a number dropped on me from a black helicopter: they come 
from the raw data of the US election assistance commission in 
Washington DC.

At the heart of the GOP's mass challenge of voters was what the 
party's top brass called caging lists - secret files of hundreds of 
thousands of voters, almost every one from a black-majority voting 
precinct.

When our investigations team, working for BBC TV, got our hands on 
these confidential files in October 2004, the Republicans told us the 
voters listed were their potential donors. Really? The sheets 
included pages of men from homeless shelters in Florida.

Donor lists, my ass. Every expert told us, these were challenge 
lists meant to stop these black voters from casting ballots.

When these caged voters arrived at the polls in November 2004, they 
found their registrations missing, their right to vote blocked or 
their absentee ballots rejected because their addresses were 
supposedly fraudulent.

Why didn't the GOP honchos fess up to challenging these allegedly 
illegal voters? Because targeting voters of colour is against the 
law. The law in question is the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The act says you can't go after groups of voters if you choose your 
targets based on race. Given that almost all the voters on the GOP 
hit list are black, the illegal racial profiling is beyond even Karl 
Rove's ability to come up with an alibi.

The Republicans target black folk not because they don't like the 
colour of their skin; they don't like the colour of their vote: 
Democrat. For that reason, the GOP included on its hit list Jewish 
retirement homes in Florida. Apparently, the GOP was also gunning for 
the Elderly of Zion.

These so-called fraudulent voters, in fact, were not fraudulent at 
all. Page after page, as we have previously reported, are black 
soldiers sent overseas. The Bush campaign used their absence from 
their US homes to accuse them of voting from false addresses.

Now that the GOP has been caught breaking the voting rights law, it 
has found a way to keep using its expensively obtained caging 
lists: let the law expire next year. If the Voting Rights Act dies in 
2007, the 2008 race will be open season on dark-skinned voters. Only 
the renewal of the Voting Rights Act can prevent the planned racial 
wrecking of democracy.
 

Before the 2000 presidential ballot, then Jeb Bush purged thousands 
of Black citizens' registrations on the grounds that they were 
felons not entitled to vote. Our review of the files determined 
that the crime of most people on the list was nothing more than VWB 
-- Voting While Black.

That felon scrub, as the state called it, had to be pre-cleared 
under the Voting Rights Act. That is, the US justice department must 
approve scrubs and other changes in procedures.

The Florida felon scrub slipped through this pre-clearance