Re: [Biofuel] accredation (old post revisited)

2006-04-16 Thread lres1

- Original Message - 
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] accredation (old post revisited)


 Hi Jason

 For those interested in self-certification, a model of grassroots
 alternative to USDA Organic that has gone global is Certified
 Naturally Grown.  Might be worth looking into.

 Yes, CNG - Compressed Natural Gas, ulp. :-)

 Quite a lot of argument at SANET about it recently. You can see it here,
see:
 27. Certified Naturally Grown vs. USDA?

 http://lists.ifas.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A1=ind0603L=sanet-mg
 SANET-MG Archives - March 2006

 Best

 Keith


 Jason West
 New Paltz, NY
 
 
 On Apr 12, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Keith Addison wrote:
 
 I am going to bring up an old post (February- lets accredit  ourselves)
 because I read the entire thread in the archives and didn't see  any
real
 decision. Why don't we form a public trade group? It would be  huge,
given
 the scale and reach of our mailing list alone. It should set off a
ripple
 that would bring all the private 'fuellers out of the woodwork to
 support or
 at least parallel our cause.
 
 Hi Jason
 
 Unless my memory errs there were objections and no consensus. Not the
 first time, I think the first such proposal was four or five years
 ago.
 
Two things, as to accreditation.

One, if this site is sole property then it has a resale value, no worries on
that score. At present it works, it helps, offers a place to voice plus it
expands my thinking for one without wading through the front cover, the
dedications and the rest that come in books that take several months to get
here. Would like to know with clarity either way. As could be construed by
the message below.

 I'm one of the objectors, by the way. That's neither here nor there
 until it comes to the matter of using the Biofuel list as a vehicle
 to extend the scale and reach of a public trade group, which could
 include identifying the one with the other, for one thing. The
 Biofuel list is not up for grabs for such purposes, or certainly not
 just automatically anyway.
 

Two, accreditation does not necessarily needs be confined to the considered
borders inherent in accreditation boundaries. This can bring up a point in
lobbying, as has been discussed till death, perhaps? To have a non paying
registered membership, that is those from the Global community that want can
register under their true names to add meaning as a Global voice/group. This
would be an option for each individual to join if they wanted to be part of
a list that could help instigate long term change for the better, even short
term would give breathing space. Or perhaps in years to come it will just
make job hunting difficult as the members would be listed in a non-friendly
un-sustainable list initiated by third parties. Here in resides yet another
small equation. If a person or persons of prominence want to speak out and
by doing so would put themselves and family in the cross hairs wants to
join, can they do this under an alias on the proviso that their actual name
is retained by the list owner or with no record at all? Or is this already
the case?

The 50's and 60's saw the forming of many who wanted out and to this end
joined communes and the likes. Only trouble was the commune was only as good
as the governance, not many of those that sprung up in such short period of
time have lasted. Some that have lasted are either based on religion or
governed by company by-laws and articles of associations or both. The free
for alls seem to have all but dissipated into the ethos.

Trusting this site is based on one or the other or both, don't need to know,
don't even need an answer just need to know that there are multitudes out
there that want sustainability accountability, education, justice and
empathy for all. Change will come behind voices, once the voices wake up.

To actually be accredited as individuals for making fuel and passing tests.
WOW I can see many openings for multitudes of new arms for buddies positions
in the
UN/WB/ADB/EU not to mention the US. This would then increase taxes or the
tax consumption rate, add more paperwork, waist time and really lead to no
place than to kill the  initiatives of those those that don't have a S S in
H of ever getting 2 cents together for registering. We have just produced a
local language booklet
with warnings etc on Ethanol production for individual family use and
manufacture, no instruments, no meters of any kind. Trialed it many times
and so far all batches have worked in the same engines. The idea is to let
the small scale farmer make their own fuel without the EU/US/UN/WB/ADB
being involved.

I for one do not want yet more regulatory authorities filled with
non-taxpaying bungling manipulating buddies using my taxes checking up any
of my
pipes. Much better I do my own checking and rely on sites like this as an
information expressway to guide me to guide others that are unable

Re: [Biofuel] accredation (old post revisited)

2006-04-12 Thread Keith Addison
I am going to bring up an old post (February- lets accredit ourselves)
because I read the entire thread in the archives and didn't see any real
decision. Why don't we form a public trade group? It would be huge, given
the scale and reach of our mailing list alone. It should set off a ripple
that would bring all the private 'fuellers out of the woodwork to support or
at least parallel our cause.

Hi Jason

Unless my memory errs there were objections and no consensus. Not the 
first time, I think the first such proposal was four or five years 
ago.

I'm one of the objectors, by the way. That's neither here nor there 
until it comes to the matter of using the Biofuel list as a vehicle 
to extend the scale and reach of a public trade group, which could 
include identifying the one with the other, for one thing. The 
Biofuel list is not up for grabs for such purposes, or certainly not 
just automatically anyway.

Best

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
KYOTO Pref., Japan
http://journeytoforever.org/
Biofuel list owner

 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] accredation (old post revisited)

2006-04-12 Thread Jason West
For those interested in self-certification, a model of grassroots  
alternative to USDA Organic that has gone global is Certified  
Naturally Grown.  Might be worth looking into.

Jason West
New Paltz, NY


On Apr 12, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Keith Addison wrote:

 I am going to bring up an old post (February- lets accredit  
 ourselves)
 because I read the entire thread in the archives and didn't see  
 any real
 decision. Why don't we form a public trade group? It would be  
 huge, given
 the scale and reach of our mailing list alone. It should set off a  
 ripple
 that would bring all the private 'fuellers out of the woodwork to  
 support or
 at least parallel our cause.

 Hi Jason

 Unless my memory errs there were objections and no consensus. Not the
 first time, I think the first such proposal was four or five years
 ago.

 I'm one of the objectors, by the way. That's neither here nor there
 until it comes to the matter of using the Biofuel list as a vehicle
 to extend the scale and reach of a public trade group, which could
 include identifying the one with the other, for one thing. The
 Biofuel list is not up for grabs for such purposes, or certainly not
 just automatically anyway.

 Best

 Keith Addison
 Journey to Forever
 KYOTO Pref., Japan
 http://journeytoforever.org/
 Biofuel list owner




 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
 biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000  
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Jason

'If we don't do the impossible, we shall be faced with the  
unthinkable'.  - Petra Kelly




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] accredation (old post revisited)

2006-04-12 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Jason

For those interested in self-certification, a model of grassroots 
alternative to USDA Organic that has gone global is Certified 
Naturally Grown.  Might be worth looking into.

Yes, CNG - Compressed Natural Gas, ulp. :-)

Quite a lot of argument at SANET about it recently. You can see it here, see:
27. Certified Naturally Grown vs. USDA?

http://lists.ifas.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A1=ind0603L=sanet-mg
SANET-MG Archives - March 2006

Best

Keith


Jason West
New Paltz, NY


On Apr 12, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Keith Addison wrote:

I am going to bring up an old post (February- lets accredit  ourselves)
because I read the entire thread in the archives and didn't see  any real
decision. Why don't we form a public trade group? It would be  huge, given
the scale and reach of our mailing list alone. It should set off a  ripple
that would bring all the private 'fuellers out of the woodwork to 
support or
at least parallel our cause.

Hi Jason

Unless my memory errs there were objections and no consensus. Not the
first time, I think the first such proposal was four or five years
ago.

I'm one of the objectors, by the way. That's neither here nor there
until it comes to the matter of using the Biofuel list as a vehicle
to extend the scale and reach of a public trade group, which could
include identifying the one with the other, for one thing. The
Biofuel list is not up for grabs for such purposes, or certainly not
just automatically anyway.

Best

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
KYOTO Pref., Japan
http://journeytoforever.org/
Biofuel list owner


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] accredation (old post revisited)

2006-04-09 Thread Jason Katie
I am going to bring up an old post (February- lets accredit ourselves) 
because I read the entire thread in the archives and didn't see any real 
decision. Why don't we form a public trade group? It would be huge, given 
the scale and reach of our mailing list alone. It should set off a ripple 
that would bring all the private 'fuellers out of the woodwork to support or 
at least parallel our cause. 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/