Are you really sure backing this change out is the right thing to do ?? -- Qing
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-src-committ...@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-src-committ...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bjoern A. Zeeb > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:23 AM > To: src-committ...@freebsd.org; svn-src-all@freebsd.org; > svn-src-h...@freebsd.org > Subject: svn commit: r191305 - head/usr.sbin/ppp > > Author: bz > Date: Mon Apr 20 11:22:51 2009 > New Revision: 191305 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/191305 > > Log: > Back out r186308: > > in case of AF_LINK, which the kernel still returns for an > RTAX_GATEWAY > as an empty sockaddr_dl in the classic tun<n> case. > Copying the address into the message payload, but not the > RTA_GATEWAY > flag results in rt_xaddrs() in the kernel tripping over > that and parsing > the next attribute set with a flag, i.e. RTA_NETMASK, with > the gateway > address, resulting in bogus route entry. > > MFC after: 3 days > > Modified: > head/usr.sbin/ppp/route.c > > Modified: head/usr.sbin/ppp/route.c > ============================================================== > ================ > --- head/usr.sbin/ppp/route.c Mon Apr 20 10:40:42 2009 > (r191304) > +++ head/usr.sbin/ppp/route.c Mon Apr 20 11:22:51 2009 > (r191305) > @@ -910,10 +910,8 @@ rt_Update(struct bundle *bundle, const s > p += memcpy_roundup(p, dst, dst->sa_len); > } > > - if (gw != NULL && (gw->sa_family != AF_LINK)) > - rtmes.m_rtm.rtm_addrs |= RTA_GATEWAY; > + rtmes.m_rtm.rtm_addrs |= RTA_GATEWAY; > p += memcpy_roundup(p, gw, gw->sa_len); > - > if (mask) { > rtmes.m_rtm.rtm_addrs |= RTA_NETMASK; > p += memcpy_roundup(p, mask, mask->sa_len); > > _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"