svn commit: r226614 - head/share/man/man9
Author: glebius Date: Fri Oct 21 13:54:17 2011 New Revision: 226614 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226614 Log: Note that it is still not possible to guard special kind of allocations, those that have special relationships with uma(9). Currently only mbuf clusters. Modified: head/share/man/man9/memguard.9 Modified: head/share/man/man9/memguard.9 == --- head/share/man/man9/memguard.9 Fri Oct 21 13:53:06 2011 (r226613) +++ head/share/man/man9/memguard.9 Fri Oct 21 13:54:17 2011 (r226614) @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ .\ .\ $FreeBSD$ .\ -.Dd October 12, 2011 +.Dd October 21, 2011 .Dt MEMGUARD 9 .Os .Sh NAME @@ -204,3 +204,17 @@ Additions have been made by and .An Gleb Smirnoff Aq gleb...@freebsd.org to both the implementation and the documentation. +.Sh BUGS +It is not possible to guard allocations that really expect theirselves to be +allocated from +.Xr uma 9 , +utilizing additional interfaces apart from +.Fn uma_zalloc +and +.Fn uma_free , +for example +.Fn uma_find_refcnt . +For the moment of writing only +.Xr mbuf 9 +cluster zones belong to that kind of allocations. +Attempt to guard them would lead to kernel panic. ___ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: svn commit: r226614 - head/share/man/man9
On 10/21/2011 06:54, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: +It is not possible to guard allocations that really expect theirselves to be s/theirselves/themselves/ Running this through aspell should have caught this. :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: svn commit: r226614 - head/share/man/man9
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Doug Barton wrote: On 10/21/2011 06:54, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: +It is not possible to guard allocations that really expect theirselves to be s/theirselves/themselves/ Running this through aspell should have caught this. :) ispell says it is OK. It is in /usr/share/dict/web2. Of course, themselves is much more commonly used while theirselves appears to be more logical[1]. :) Sean 1. http://color-connection.com/EngVW/Lessons/lesson1.htm -- s...@freebsd.org ___ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: svn commit: r226614 - head/share/man/man9
On 10/21/2011 17:27, Sean C. Farley wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Doug Barton wrote: On 10/21/2011 06:54, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: +It is not possible to guard allocations that really expect theirselves to be s/theirselves/themselves/ Running this through aspell should have caught this. :) ispell says it is OK. That's why I specifically said aspell. :) It tends to do a better job identifying technically-acceptable-but-not-mainstream usage. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
