Re: [swfmill] mp3 import bug
Yes, we *really* need a new release of SWFMill... The version on SVN is a lot more advanced than the current release. There are quite a few of us using swfmill on a daily basis and not all people is capable of compiling from sources. Last time i tried in Ubuntu i couldn't, can't even remember why. What about SWFMill 0.4?? On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Rostislav Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralf, thanks a million! This version fixes my problem. Do you know why it's not available on http://swfmill.org/pre/? Does Dan know about your builds? Thanks again! Rostislav On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Ralf Fuest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The 0.2.12.4 version you tried is to old and doesn't contain the fixed mp3 support. You can find a newer svn build at: http://pep-mp.de/swfmill/swfmill-0.2.12.6-win32.zip Ralf Thank you for your interest guys! I started preparing the test case and it turned out that all the mp3s are lacking about 2-3 seconds from the beginning. The audio is a recorded speech and I haven't noticed that the first few words are missing. I was able to catch only the one that truncates one of the words. I'm trying it with the 0.2.12 and 0.2.12.4 windows binaries. If somebody has the exact stereo/bitrate/crc settings that should work please let me know. The binary way works but I'd better start learning jsfl. Thanks, Rostislav ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org -- Asual - Open software that pushes the limits http://www.asual.com/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org -- Juan Delgado - Zárate http://zarate.tv http://dandolachapa.com http://loqueyosede.com ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] mp3 import bug
Zárate, if you like, I can send you my binary. Not sure if that would work, but it might be worth a shot. It's built on Gentoo for Pentium-M. Mark On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Zárate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, we *really* need a new release of SWFMill... The version on SVN is a lot more advanced than the current release. There are quite a few of us using swfmill on a daily basis and not all people is capable of compiling from sources. Last time i tried in Ubuntu i couldn't, can't even remember why. What about SWFMill 0.4?? On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Rostislav Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralf, thanks a million! This version fixes my problem. Do you know why it's not available on http://swfmill.org/pre/? Does Dan know about your builds? Thanks again! Rostislav On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Ralf Fuest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The 0.2.12.4 version you tried is to old and doesn't contain the fixed mp3 support. You can find a newer svn build at: http://pep-mp.de/swfmill/swfmill-0.2.12.6-win32.zip Ralf Thank you for your interest guys! I started preparing the test case and it turned out that all the mp3s are lacking about 2-3 seconds from the beginning. The audio is a recorded speech and I haven't noticed that the first few words are missing. I was able to catch only the one that truncates one of the words. I'm trying it with the 0.2.12 and 0.2.12.4 windows binaries. If somebody has the exact stereo/bitrate/crc settings that should work please let me know. The binary way works but I'd better start learning jsfl. Thanks, Rostislav ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org -- Asual - Open software that pushes the limits http://www.asual.com/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org -- Juan Delgado - Zárate http://zarate.tv http://dandolachapa.com http://loqueyosede.com ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
[swfmill] maintainer-wanted (was: Re: mp3 import bug)
quoting Zárate [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What about SWFMill 0.4?? 0.3 is first ;) for me, i wouldn't mind just promoting the current SVN to 0.3, to communicate the steps and stability improvement it made recently. thing is, my compile-to-windows setup broke and is not easily recreatable. also, the OSX machine i've been using to make the mac versions doesn't exist any more. so. swfmill surely needs a release. but first, it needs a maintainer to coordinate compiles for the three platforms. -dan ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] mp3 import bug
quoting Zárate [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yes, we *really* need a new release of SWFMill... The version on SVN is a lot more advanced than the current release. There are quite a few of us using swfmill on a daily basis and not all people is capable of compiling from sources. Last time i tried in Ubuntu i couldn't, can't even remember why. for linux distributions, packaging work should go into distribution-specific binary packages, not into a binary release on swfmill.org. and it really should compile quite easily, if it doesnt, please report a bug. -dan ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] maintainer-wanted (was: Re: mp3 import bug)
Hello Daniel all, I've spent 3 days recently to compile swfmill for windows, and I can do it reliably now I think. The only problem is that it makes a 13mb binary (and requiring libiconv-2.dll).. I can maybe even set up an automatic builder, but first someone needs to point me how to shrink the binary to a reasonable size - I am not sure my way is optimal. I was using MSYS/MinGW chain. Mike DF quoting Zárate [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What about SWFMill 0.4?? DF 0.3 is first ;) DF for me, i wouldn't mind just promoting the current SVN to 0.3, to DF communicate the steps and stability improvement it made recently. DF thing is, my compile-to-windows setup broke and is not easily DF recreatable. also, the OSX machine i've been using to make the mac DF versions doesn't exist any more. DF so. swfmill surely needs a release. but first, it needs a maintainer to DF coordinate compiles for the three platforms. DF -dan DF ___ DF swfmill mailing list DF swfmill@osflash.org DF http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org -- Best regards, Michaelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] Splitting simple dialect in several files
Hello Ralf, I've finally managed to try the function of splitting an xml into pieces I asked you to implement several months ago, and found a problem: I can easily compile an swf from pieces but the resources are not available. The xmls look like: root.xml movie version=8 frame library include file=inc.xml / /library /frame /movie and inc.xml movie version=8 frame library clip import=file.swf / /library /frame /movie this compiles but no resources available then. Maybe I am using that in a wrong way somehow? Mike Sunday, October 7, 2007, 9:54:31 PM, you wrote: RF Hello Michael, RF the function you described didn't exist in swfmill. But I think it is a RF useful feature, so I implemented it and now the svn version supports RF this feature. RF The syntax is equal to your proposal. The included files need to have RF the same format as any other swfml simple file. All tags inside the root RF movie tag are include. The attributes of the movie tag in the included RF files are ignored. RF Ralf I am sorry if this is a newbie question, but I didn't find anything on the net yet. Is there a way to split a simple dialect XML file into several ones? I'd like to have something like include functionality, so you can write it like include file=another.xml / and another.xml would be processed as a part of main file. The reason for this is easy support for different themes in my application: I'd like some resources to be theme-specific and others to be shared. -- Best regards, Michaelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] Splitting simple dialect in several files
Oh. Not the easy 2-second answer then... I tried the include id=otherfile file=temp.xml / and clip id=otherfile import=temp.xml / and neither worked. Are you doing something like: swfmill file1.xml file1.swf swfmill file2.xml file2.swf and then using both these in haXe as separate swf -lib items? I imagine there are some OK workarounds for this. Gabino - Original Message - From: Michael Pliskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gabino Travassos [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: swfmill@osflash.org Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:25 AM Subject: Re: [swfmill] Splitting simple dialect in several files Hello Gabino, thanks for the reply, this import is to be used as a sample only - it has id attribute in reality, and it works without include tag, so the problem is not here - the include tag is what I am trying to make work.. Mike GT I'm just guessing here, but I think the import tag needs a referrer name. GT Here's an XML file I made that has a jpeg and mp3 embedded in it: GT ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ? GT movie version=8 width=800 height=600 framerate=30 GT background color=#fcfcfc / GT library GT clip id=img1 import=images/784I.jpg / GT clip id =fallout import=the_fallout_PunkIsDead.mp3 / GT /library GT frame GT place id=fallout /place id=file1 / GT /frame GT /movie GT I get SWFMill to export and swf from this: swfmill simple file.xml file.swf GT in my .hx file I am referring to it: GT var fallout=new Sound(null); GT fallout.attachSound(fallout); // this is the id from the xml file GT fallout.start(); GT And my .hx file needs this at the top: GT import flash.Sound; GT - Original Message - GT From: Michael Pliskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] GT To: Ralf Fuest [EMAIL PROTECTED] GT Cc: swfmill@osflash.org GT Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 8:05 AM GT Subject: Re: [swfmill] Splitting simple dialect in several files Hello Ralf, I've finally managed to try the function of splitting an xml into pieces I asked you to implement several months ago, and found a problem: I can easily compile an swf from pieces but the resources are not available. The xmls look like: root.xml movie version=8 frame library include file=inc.xml / /library /frame /movie and inc.xml movie version=8 frame library clip import=file.swf / /library /frame /movie this compiles but no resources available then. Maybe I am using that in a wrong way somehow? Mike Sunday, October 7, 2007, 9:54:31 PM, you wrote: RF Hello Michael, RF the function you described didn't exist in swfmill. But I think it is a RF useful feature, so I implemented it and now the svn version supports RF this feature. RF The syntax is equal to your proposal. The included files need to have RF the same format as any other swfml simple file. All tags inside the root RF movie tag are include. The attributes of the movie tag in the included RF files are ignored. RF Ralf I am sorry if this is a newbie question, but I didn't find anything on the net yet. Is there a way to split a simple dialect XML file into several ones? I'd like to have something like include functionality, so you can write it like include file=another.xml / and another.xml would be processed as a part of main file. The reason for this is easy support for different themes in my application: I'd like some resources to be theme-specific and others to be shared. -- Best regards, Michaelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org -- Best regards, Michaelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
