Re: [swinog] The truth about UCEPROTECT-Blocklists
Salut, On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:01:38AM +0100, Michael Naef wrote: *arrrghhh* [EMAIL PROTECTED]: host psa1.as8833.net[195.162.162.159] said: 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.7.17) (in reply to RCPT TO command) This has been a known problem for a long time already: http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/detail.php?domain=gpstechnik.chsubmitted=1033063711table=abuse Sometimes I'm tempted to use rfc-ignorant.org as a blacklist. Tonnerre pgplsPQqhFQUQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: Re: [swinog] The truth about UCEPROTECT-Blocklists
Dear Claus On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 02:41 +0100, Claus v. Wolfhausen wrote: we have Level 1 listed the IP 195.162.162.159 spamming the list with it's stupid autoresponder, so if swinog uses UCEPROTECT-Level 1 the loop should be broken now. Tell me, that you are not really blocking IPs because of some email domains behind are throwing automatically created reponses back? You are really comparing apple to pears. You should block email domains but not IPs. Let's say you have a load balanced environment with let's say 100'000 domains and 1 mio email addresses, using a /24 for email services. The collateral damage you are taking in account if one single address is throwing back automated responses is immense. Not to mention if you are blocking one IP - you then have a lottery if email will get transmitted. Sorry, but that gets me upset. Cheerz - Dan ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] The truth about UCEPROTECT-Blocklists
Claus v. Wolfhausen wrote: Perhaps you don't know that i took over the UCEPROTECT-Project in June 2007, so if you had any problems with UCEPROTECT some years ago, then you had differences with my predecessor and not with me. Many things have changed here since i am responsible for the project. It does seem somewhat problematic that you would list someone for having a poorly configured auto-responder. How does that fit in with the blacklist policy for Level1? /Per Jessen, Herrliberg ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] The truth about UCEPROTECT-Blocklists
Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote: This has been a known problem for a long time already: http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/detail.php?domain=gpstechnik.chsubmitted=1033063711table=abuse Sometimes I'm tempted to use rfc-ignorant.org as a blacklist. I know you won't, but be careful anyway - whois.rfc-ignorant also lists 165 TLDs (.dk, .de, .eu ...) due to no WHOIS server or incomplete data in server. /Per Jessen, Herrliberg ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] The truth about cheap sysadmins
Hello, On 17.01.2008, at 11:30, Martin Ebnoether wrote: Can't help it but: BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! AFAIR, postmaster should work. It's been almost two years, since I was the mail-hosli there. Hmmm, if I'm looking at what happens if you're trying to send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wouldn't be too surprised if you'd get a mailbox over quota for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account. CU Tobias ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
[swinog] Zattoo is hiring: Linux Sysadmin
Zattoo is hiring one or two Linux Sysadmins: https://zattoo.com/jobs_biz https://zattoo.com/images/pdfs/Linux_Sys_Admin.pdf Kind regards, Fredy Künzler Zattoo Europe Ltd. http://www.zattoo.com/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
