[swinog] Re: BGP4nerds
Hoi, Super cool news, Fredy. Thanks for bringing it at Christmas time, and happy holidays to you and the crew of 13030! :) groet, Pim On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 11:39 AM Fredy Künzler via swinog < swinog@lists.swinog.ch> wrote: > While I do know that this mailing list is not intended for product > announcements, I allow myself to make an exception. > > In the past years we have been asked so many times "can you do a BGP4 > feed via Fiber7, I have my own ASN and IP space" and my answer was > always "technically we can but we need to setup a product in our ERP > system first and define the implementation process. This will take a > while...". To be honest it wasn't our highest priority, though. > > Of course we forgot meanwhile to whom we were talking and so we are > unable to contact people individually. Most people are certainly from > this community. > > Now your prayers have been answered :-) > > I'm happy to announce that we have now "BGP4nerds" available. > Requirement is a new or existing Fiber7 connection - no BBCS (Copper7) > or BBCS-F (Hybrid7) based service. > > We charge CHF 30 per month extra for the BGP service along with a one > time fee. This offering is of course strictly limited to non-commercial > use and only available to private customers. > > If you are interested please send a note to sales at init7 dot net with > the subject "BGP4nerds" and we'll send you a spec sheet with all the > details. > > Happy Christmas to everyone! > > -- > Fredy Künzler > > Init7 (Switzerland) Ltd. > Technoparkstrasse 5 > CH-8406 Winterthur > https://www.init7.net/ > https://ftth.init7.net/ > ___________ > swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch > To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-le...@lists.swinog.ch > -- Pim van Pelt PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-le...@lists.swinog.ch
[swinog] Re: Swiss Domain Security Report Q3 2022
Hoi Andres, Super interesting, I appreciate the effort! One thing I noticed when you wrote "2.7% (4'394) are internationalized domain name (IDN) using Punycode", I think that N-count is higher than 4'394. I'm pretty surprised that of the 1.7M domains with an MX record, only 57% have DKIM -- do these folks ever send e-mail to yahoo/gmx/gmail/office365 ? As a DKIM/DPF/DMARC/STS-MTA user, for now I can still deliver mail to Big Tech, and I hope to be in that state for a long time to come (not only because my mailserver is older than most of Big Tech ...). Thank you for sending along. groet, Pim On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 8:19 PM Bohren, Andres via swinog < swinog@lists.swinog.ch> wrote: > Hi All, > > Over the last Months I've created the Swiss Domain Security Report from > all ~2.4 Mio .ch Domains. > The Report focuses on an overview about Mail security in Switzerland (Data > from Q3 2022) > > All the details can be found here: > > https://blog.icewolf.ch/archive/2023/06/07/swiss-domain-security-report-q3-2022/ > > Kind Regards > Andres Bohren > ___ > swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch > To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-le...@lists.swinog.ch > -- Pim van Pelt PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-le...@lists.swinog.ch
Re: [swinog] Looking for a fanless server
You could take a look at bytemine servers which I think satisfy all your requests except that they take only one ssd by default. Pim On Oct 10, 2013 2:24 AM, Stanislav Sinyagin ssinya...@yahoo.com wrote: hi, I'm looking for a Swiss supplier that would offer fanless server appliances, as follows: * 19 rack mount, 1RU high * Fanless design (no moving parts), ability to operate in a normal room environment (25C or so) * Modern CPU, like Core i5 or i7, or some latest-generation ARM, or maybe even MIPS architecture of comparable performance * Graphical performance is non-important, a standard VGA is fine, serial or USB console is even better * Two SSD hard drives. Probably a RAID controller, but also fine without it * Support for 2 or more GB RAM * Two or more 10/100/1000 Ethernet ports * Linux support for all hardware components * 1-2 years warranty, replacement within a week by post. This is a one-off, low-volume request, 1 or 2 devices for the start, and maybe 3-5 devices within a year or two. Quotations will be welcome at ssinya...@k-open.com thanks, stan ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Kinder die Programmieren lernen wollen
Perhaps I have the inverse problem of most swiss 10 year olds (my german may not be up to this :), but I can certainly try. I may ask you to proofread for grammar (auf dem Tisch, auf den TIsch, im Office, ins Office, what a joke for non-natives!). groet, Pim 2013/9/6 Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch: Hi, Today, the 10 year old son of a friend of mine, wrote me an email, asking me how to learn to program. I did some research and found code-monster (www.crunchzilla.com/code-monster) seems ideal. Only that the english abilities of most 10 year olds in switzerland are not up to this. I asked the author of the system, if there is a way to translate the course. And indeed there is ... If you would like to help translating this to german, and thus help more swiss (and german and austrian) kids get an early start with programming, please drop me a line. I will give you access to a google spread sheet with all the text that needs translating. It is 520 paragraphs ... cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch t...@oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] UPC AS6830 Looking Glass / Traceroute?
If you wish, I can give you access to a machine that is in this (a clients) network, ping me off list for the coordinates. On Jul 22, 2013 3:13 PM, Fredy Kuenzler kuenz...@init7.net wrote: Is anyone aware of a UPC AS6830 Looking Glass and/or Traceroute? Or could anyone give us shell access to a host which is within AS6830? Thanks, -- Fredy Kuenzler Init7 (Switzerland) Ltd. AS13030 St. Georgen-Strasse 70 CH-8400 Winterthur Skype: flyingpotato Phone: +41 44 315 4400 Fax: +41 44 315 4401 Twitter: @init7 / @kuenzler http://www.init7.net/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Fun with Fiber
Hoi, 2013/3/18 Andre Oppermann opperm...@networx.ch: The Netflix guys wiring up a fully loaded ASR9010 with 118 single mode fibers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyb-nnRNwfw Cool! Their CDN boxes are almost stock FreeBSD 9.1 based, contain some 35 HDDs at 4TB plus a couple of SSDs and push about 15Gbit/s *each* during the evening hours. They are limited by HDD (seek) bandwidth. Do you think they use ZFS+L2ARC as the filesystem of their content push system? groet, Pim -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Tele2 not reachable?
Hoi, On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Stefan Rothenbuehler stefan_rothenbueh...@bluewin.ch wrote: Hello List We're having trouble delivering mail to tele2.ch. Their MX record seem to be gone. Did they stop working? It is broken, I can confirm from my site: A, , and MX for tele2.ch are all NXDOMAIN. Strangely the serial of tele2.ch is 2012010201. Adding regis...@swip.net as per their RP record. groet, Pim -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] IPv6 de-aggregation
Hoi John, Interesting situation! On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:09 AM, john.coll...@bit.admin.ch wrote: Hi SWINOG members, we’re a LIR, we got a /32 from RIPE and we want to allocate /40s and /48s to customers. Only snag is that the customers will not have their Internet feed from us but from any Service Provider of their choice. The /32 you received from RIPE is implicitly provider aggregatable and cannot be deaggregated. Your downstreams could announce their /40 or /48 to their peers, but filtering is pretty strict with IPv6 community, so it's not expected that they will obtain global visibility via their X Y Z service provider. /0: 1, /8: 1, /10: 1, /12: 1, /16: 1, /19: 2, /20: 5, /21: 3 /22: 5, /23: 5, /24: 7, /25: 4, /26: 9, /27: 10, /28: 31, /29: 19 /30: 15, /31: 13, /32: 4049, /33: 97, /34: 87, /35: 93, /36: 242, /37: 7 /38: 50, /39: 22, /40: 385, /41: 12, /42: 18, /43: 34, /44: 151, /45: 15 /46: 75, /47: 45, /48: 3006, /49: 3, /50: 1, /52: 5, /56: 9, /64: 40 /126: 1, /128: 45 So where did all the /48s come from ... also one or two /40s... ?? There exists also provider independent IPv6 space -- it was contested for many years, but it is now possible at several RIRs to receive a /40 or /48 PI. What do you think about this? If you’re a SP would you route the /48s or /40s from the customers? What about your upstream peers? I would not advertise, but I would accept up to /40. Most upstreams I had dealt with accept only the PA block as a whole, ie no de-aggregation. -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Cablecom Internet-Services down
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Martin Ebnoether ventila...@semmel.ch wrote: Cablecom hat soeben auf Twitter geschrieben: Unsere Internet-Services funktionieren schweizweit zurzeit nicht. Techniker sind dran. Wir bitten um Entschuldigung. Man kann jedenfalls noch online. Mehr als Internet aus der Wand benutz ich von denen aber auch nicht. connectivity (in 8306 Bruttisellen at least) is fine. $ ifconfig vlan4 vlan4: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 lladdr 00:0d:b9:1d:cf:68 description: Cablecom priority: 0 vlan: 4 priority: 0 parent interface: vr0 groups: vlan egress inet6 fe80::20d:b9ff:fe1d:cf68%vlan4 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 inet 80.218.15.151 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 $ netstat -rn | grep default default80.218.14.1UGS28500 584672632 - 8 vlan4 default2001:4dd0:ff00:4::1UGS 0 2549934 - 8 gif0 $ ping 80.218.14.1 PING 80.218.14.1 (80.218.14.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 80.218.14.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=9.650 ms $ ping 194.1.163.1 PING 194.1.163.1 (194.1.163.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 194.1.163.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=23.571 ms I don't know what their definition of 'internet services' is? -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Extraction fees
Hoi, Thank you to all who responded. As an additional note to this and considering the question came up a lot: there was not a contract for this project, it was employee-initiated in 2007 and management terminated in 2011, and there were no bills until after the equipment stopped pinging (ie the only invoice I've ever seen is this one to release my computers). groet, Pim -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
[swinog] Extraction fees
Hi NOG! An ISP that I have had a ~4y relationship with has recently terminated the hosting for a small number of servers (3x 1U machine and a switch and a console server). For a while they were not able to return my equipment to me, but now they have sent me a friendly letter asking me to pay a significant sum of money (to the tune of 4000 CHF) extraction fee, and that I must accompany two engineers on-site for about 16 hours to safely remove the equipment. Is it common for swiss companies to terminate agreements and then send an invoice for returning the property? Feel free to drop me a note off-list. -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] IP network not reachable from switzerland - 69.162.65.122, but from outside, eg belarus/brasil
For what it's worth: Stephan, could you be so kind and check, if you can connect to this host, and tell me, via which ISP / peering ? $ telnet 69.162.65.122 25 Trying 69.162.65.122... Connected to 69.162.65.122. Escape character is '^]'. 220-vitoria.dedicado.in ESMTP Exim 4.69 #1 Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:16:41 -0300 220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 220 and/or bulk e-mail. This is from 74.125.57.33 in AS15169 (reaching you via abovenet) and 193.109.122.62 in AS12859 (reaching you via ntt/pnap: 2914 12179 46475 I) HTH, -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch internal blacklist
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Sergey Cheremnykh sergey.cherem...@gmail.com wrote: Our mailserver is rejected by the bluewin.ch MX with reason Connection not accepted from blacklisted IP address, but I found no entry in the usual blacklists. .. and of course dropping SMTP traffic based on a non-disclosed/documented blacklist is entirely in appropriate and should get people fired :) -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Anti-virus solution for Linux mail server
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Philip Iezzi philip.ie...@datenpark.ch wrote: Hi there We're a small Swiss hosting provider. Currently we host over 4000 IMAP mail accounts on Debian Linux mail servers (Postfix/Amavis/Spamassassin/ClamAV/Cyrus). As anti-virus solution we are using ClamAV over Amavis (amavisd-new) at the SMTP level. We are looking for a more professional anti-virus solution and would like to add another anti-virus engine At an ISP I used to work at (BIT in the Netherlands) we had four scanners on every e-mail: clam, f-prot, sophos and mcafee. All of these ran under Linux and from amavisd. After I left I think perhaps that BIT dropped one or more of those, but in my experience there really were (long tail) virusses that were caught by each engine separately and uniquely so there was benefit to having more than one scanner. I don't know much about licensing costs, but would offer that this is largely a game of 'being the persuasive customer' when it comes to bulk licensing. groet, Pim -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Any problem connecting Google ?
I can access google just fine from 15169 and 12589 and 3303. Pim On Feb 2, 2011 2:54 PM, Guazzoni Daniele, CH daniele.guazz...@audatex.ch wrote: Anyone else experiencing problems accessing Google ? regards -- Daniele Guazzoni Senior Network Engineer Cisco Certified Network Professional Email: daniele.guazz...@audatex.ch Audatex (Switzerland) LLC Zollstrasse 62 CH-8021 Zuerich Tel : +41 44 278 87 54 Int : 4148754 Fax : +41 44 278 85 15 Web : http://www.audatex.com Audatex , a Solera company This e-mail, any associated files and the information contained in them are confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error please notify the originator and delete the email immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. E-mails to and from the company are monitored for operational reasons and in accordance with lawful business practices. Any opinions expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily represent the views of the company. The company does not conclude contracts by email and all negotiations are subject to contract. We make every effort to maintain our network free from computer viruses but accept no responsibility for any viruses which might be transferred by this e-mail. ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] The ISP Association: one for all, all for one
Hey Pascal, On Oct 28, 2010 5:24 AM, Pascal Gloor pascal.gl...@spale.com wrote: Dear SwiNOGers, You may have heard of it (or maybe you joined it); a few weeks ago SwiNOG Org made a special SwiNOG event about lawful intercept. I'm sure you have good state on what type of laws there are in play in Switzerland (better than I am, for sure). I wanted to ask you if you had been in touch with other countries' task force teams? I was a member of the NBIP (the dutch foundation for ISPs who were legally bound to comply with interception regulations), and in fact the ISP I worked for directly (www.bit.nl) was a host of two of the physical interception machines because they were sort of in the middle of the country. A good guy to talk to is Pim van Stam and I can introduce you if you have the need. Just FYI :) groet, Pim -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] port 25 outbound
Hoi, On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Manfredo Miserocchi m...@wari.net wrote: does none of you use to block port 25 outbound on mailservers ? The ISP I used to work for was admittedly a business customer oriented one, but we had the corporate philosophy to offer unrestricted and open internet to all of our access customers. This means we fundamentally would not block any outbound ports. The actual problem is that a mobile customer cannot send out his e-mail from his ISP mailserver, but only from the mobile company one. If this will result true, it will be a strong limitation on the market. My counsel: chose another ISP and take your business to a place which does not chose the cheap way out (filter for all, ignore the collateral damage). I believe the best possible choice is to offer by-default restricted (filtered inbound, outbound whatever seems reasonable for the ISP) but allow users to move to a different configuration which is unfiltered entirely. The ISP can detect bad behavior/infected machines (for example search for VIRBL) and force migration to a third (quarantine) pool, or if they don't want to do that, put the user in the restricted pool again. groet, Pim -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] reject_unknown_client_hostname
Hoi, On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Juerg Reimann j...@jworld.ch wrote: Does anybody know whether the Postfix checks reject_unknown_client_hostname [aka Reject the request when 1) the client IP address-name mapping fails, 2) the name-address mapping fails, or 3) the name-address mapping does not match the client IP address] follows actually any requirement by a RFC? If so, which one? I do not think it is a requirement by RFC, and I also think it is strictly harmful to force the connecting IP address to resemble the hostname, for example a pool of machines called smtp[1-9].example.com going out via a single IP address. Calling them all smtp.example.com is (a) not true and (b) frustrates debugging. groet, Pim -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Probleme mit Resolving nic.ch
Does your firewall also allow egress tcp sessions on port 53? Can you run tcpdump while trying to resolve? And what address(es) specifically fail for you? ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] dirt cheap netbook at Mediamarkt
Hoi 2010/1/31 Stanislav Sinyagin ssinya...@yahoo.com: couldn't believe my eyes yesterday at Mediamarkt: a quite solid netbook with 1 gig RAM for only 300 CHF. People on the net report quite good build quality, and Ubuntu running out of the box: http://www.pctipp.ch/news/hardware/50348/media_markt_angebote_top_oder_flop_p3.html The price looks great, but I have one concern with the intel graphics; See here: http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/how-kick-your-friends-face-gma500 Grafikkarte: Intel GMA950 A Google colleague of mine has been trying to get this to work accelerated, without much luck. His blog entry about it is here: http://credentiality2.blogspot.com/2009/08/accelerated-video-on-dell-mini-10-with.html but note: this may be a different card - I'm pointing it out because Intel graphics has seen a lot of criticism in the past, so if Windows is not your target OS, perhaps this can be considered as a gentle warning :) groet, Pim -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Debian vs. Ubuntu
Topquote alert... I use LTS and found it of higher feature completeness and equal stability and security as compared to debian stable. I no longer install debian, but I am also a relatively smalltime user. Pim On Jan 28, 2010 3:28 PM, Schlageter Benjamin b.schlage...@ebm.ch wrote: Hi Swinog, I wonder if someone has any experiences with Ubuntu as server distribution? Till this day, we use only Debian - but to the end of Debian 4.0 we must upgrade every server to get still security patches. Now I consider to change to Ubuntu with the 5 year LTS versions. Cheers, Benjamin ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] cablecom 8306 problems?
Hey Benoit, On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Benoit Panizzon paniz...@woody.ch wrote: Perhaps others have seen troubles in the Eden of Cablecom? Same Problem in 5605. It turns out that yes, there was a spot of trouble at Cablecom, and to their honor they fessed up to it: http://www.cablecom.ch/popup_netzwerkstatus.htm?status=erledigt Twitter and other microblogs were full of comments, so it seems that this was pretty wide spread. It'd be great to read a postmortem, but I think this is as far as Cablecom will go regarding the outage. Well, back to work, business as usual! groet, Pim -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] IRCnet server for *.ch
Hoi, On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Fabian Uebersaxfabian.ueber...@vtx-telecom.ch wrote: Hi everybody, We've decided that we no longer have the resources to host our IRC server irc.datacomm.ch / irc.span.ch, which is connected to IRCnet (http://www.ircnet.com/). Currently, we're the only swiss server for IRCnet. That's not quite true as of today :) If you're interested please contact me offlist, thanks! So, I was interested and so was IP-Man. Fabian, Greg and I got together, scored a machine, went on vacations, got sick, procrastinated and then finally today hung up a new machine in Geneva (about 200m from the Jet d'Eau :). This server is called ircnet.ipng.ch and is accessible for all LI and CH users (at least, if you have a netblock registered at RIPE NCC). If you have access issues, please contact me off-list at irc...@ipng.ch and we'll take a look at adding a manual config entry for your network(s). Enjoy, groet, Pim -- Pim van Pelt p...@ipng.nl PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] SwissIX goes 10Gig!
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 01:02:30AM +0200, Daniel G. Kluge wrote: Can you send us a trace from your location and probably an ip-address close to you we may ping/trace? Followup please to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Because this is of general interest, I'll keep swinog looped in; When I try to reach www.swissix.ch from the internet, it seems that I do make it into AS13030, hitting r9.ipv6.init7.net (2001:1620::9). But the pollux.swissix.ch machine doesn't seem to have a route back to me (AS12859 for example). I noticed that you are using an IXP prefix for your webserver. Looking at SixXS' distributed looking glass[1], I see that still many ISPs are not accepting this /48 into their routing tables (and in my opinion, rightfully so). The IXP prefixes were not meant to host services in, rather only to make sure switch fabric is using a globally unique prefix (which comes in handy with stuff like DNS and ICMP unreachables and the like). I think that RIPE NCC has mentioned something to that effect when 2001:7f8:24::/48 was allocated. It might make more sense to host the webserver from a prefix that is visible in the DFZ everywhere, but I don't think that's the problem here. [1] shows that many people do not have a route for your /48 groet, Pim [1] http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/lg/?when=nowyear=2007month=10day=14hour=19show=allpathsformat=htmlreport_grhwork=onreport_grhfail=onfindtype=prefixfind=2001%3A7f8%3A24%3A%3A%2F48 -- -- - -- - -+- - -- - -- Pim van Pelt Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ipng.nl/ IPv6 Deployment --- ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] ADSL in Portugal
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:53:36PM +0200, Xaver Aerni wrote: | We are needing for a client ADSL Lines in Portugal | Has one ISP hier contact with a Portugal Office or a ISP. | You may want to try NFSI (www.nfsi.pt) groet, Pim -- -- - -- - -+- - -- - -- Pim van Pelt Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ipng.nl/ IPv6 Deployment --- ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-BE46 - Beer Event 46 - 19th of February 07 @ Don Weber/Zurich
Hoi! | sorry, i'm quite late and reservation deadline is friday ,-( | but next monday is the next planned beer event (just aside TIX) ,-) I'm in transit from NL to CH on that date - as a new comer (I came through AS8954, then AS12859, and started at AS15169 last August) I've sort of gotten out of touch of the NLnog folks. I am looking forward to meeting people in Switzerland, that can talk ISIS and BGP with me :) mfg! -- -- - -- - -+- - -- - -- Pim van Pelt Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ipng.nl/ IPv6 Deployment --- ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
