Re: [swinog] SwissIX - peers dropping offline
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 18:20:33 +0100 Michel Renfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All! We see currently some peers (mainly on site Zurich 1) dropping off- and online since arround 4pm. Other peers at site glattbrugg are online without interruptions. we see the same on our side. as we are connected at Zürich 1, I have shutdown all SwissIx peerings. as soon the link is stable again we'll enable all peerings. ueli -- The software said it requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Bluewin SMTP proxy?
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:56:13 +0100 Daniel Roethlisberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think - mayby I'm wrong - this thread (SPF +/-) should move to the spam-list. Ueli Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-11-10T00:00]: First of all it is broken or breaks many valid applications. e.g. forwarding does not work correctly and user that are forced to use some smtp proxy will have issues too. And then there are those who still believe open relays are the right thing to do, because mail has always worked that way in the past... SPF does break verbatim forwarding, yes, unless forwarders do some kind of envelope return path mangling (eg, SRS). Call it taking responsibility for your outgoing mail. Actually, I don't think this is such a bad idea in general, even if it is not a perfect solution. Additionally it is useless. Currently 90% of SPF verified traffic is spam. Where did you get those numbers from? SPF does not prevent spam it is a user verification system and it does that very bad. Use crypto instead. SPF is *not* designed to prevent spam, it is designed to prevent domain forgery in envelope return paths. Different story. It certainly does no such thing as user verification. You might have misunderstood some of the concepts behind SPF. Cheers Dan -- Daniel Roethlisberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG Key ID 0x804A06B1 (DSA/ElGamal) ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog -- The software said it requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] IP Phones INOC DBA
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:37:58 -0400 Marcel Prisi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We receiced the phones last week, don't know about the invoice. we didn't get any thing till now :( Ueli Kuster, Christian wrote: Hi As most of you, I ordere that stuff. However, I never got a confirmation. Funny enough, today I received an Invoice from ALSO ABC for the phones. But I have NOT received the phones Has somebody received the phones??? Or also only the invoice ?? Christian -- The software said it requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] S.HDSL modem
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:29:08 +0200 Christian Jouas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Heya all, Thats the Watson (Schmidt) gang ;-) What about Telindus, Paradyne, Net2Net, Colt ? there are more products ... bintec, zyxel ies 1000 (up to 16MBit/s) Ueli [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11.08.2004 13:45:55 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michel we're also using the Watson5 :) cheers Alain -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Michel Renfer Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 11:38 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [swinog] S.HDSL modem Hi All! Anyone can suggest a good S.HDSL modem with ethernet interface and support for 4.6 MBit/s line rate over 4 wire? cheers, michel ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0.2 iQA/AwUBQRoG85K5PIUjRpTyEQLrlwCfSKCbmo8ybYwT3i8eXylW458sjTQAnR7F TWIFbVZt0WnQJAXtdSt6OVwU =R46j -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog -- The software said it requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] VRF + OSPF issue
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 17:20:11 +0200 Pascal Gloor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone noticed that the passive interface command is not available for an OSPF Process running within a VRF ? Solutions? Workarounds? (filtering multicast is not a solution :-)) PS: I'm talking about IOS, and especially 12.3(6a) what if you use the network-statements to match only the desired interface? to run ospf only on Fa 0/0 you may use following: interface FastEthernet 0/0 ip address 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 interface fastethernet 1/0 ip address 172.16.2.0 255.255.255.0 ! router ospf 100 network 172.16.1.1 0.0.0.255 area 0 ! Ueli -- The software said it requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Kassensturz
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:37:33 +0100 Marc Loosli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kassensturz.ch Homepage: :-) have a look at the filepaths listet below (and put them into your webbrowser) .. oops :) the question is: which door is not closed? Ueli Warning: mysql_connect(): Too many connections in /data/sfdrs.ch/www/htdocs/content/highlights/kassensturz/includes/dbopen .inc on line 2 Warning: mysql_select_db(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /data/sfdrs.ch/www/htdocs/content/highlights/kassensturz/includes/dbopen .inc on line 3 Warning: mysql_query(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /data/sfdrs.ch/www/htdocs/content/highlights/kassensturz/classes/cSendun g.cls on line 60 -- The software said it requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: R: [swinog] Re: Case ID 1070964 - Notice of Claimed Infringement
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:25:52 +0200 Manuel Wenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are all too generous with these people. That's a complete waste of time. A notice of claimed infringement from the United States has no legal value whatsoever in Switzerland. We receive tons of these emails everyday. I personally classify them as Spam. If they want something from us, they can ask a Swiss judge. Period. :-) full ack and do not forget to ask for a french, german, italien or much better a rumansch translation! and BTW, how can I be sure that the sender is really the copyright holder? every body can write such emails. Ueli -- The software said it requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Gbit Interface and VLANs
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:32:15 +0200 Pascal Gloor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: maybe (as it is on 2924XL): no switchport mode trunk if its IOS switchport mode access might help. or if its CatOS set trunk x/y off catalyst 4000 ist CatOS - switch. you have to use the set trunk x/y off command Ueli -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] bgp-sessions at tix
Hi, At this time I see a lot of peers going up and down. Is there something going on at the tix? Ueli -- The software said it requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] BGP RouteServer
Hi I'm about to leave for 3 weeks vacations, during this time, if there is any major problem with the SwiNOG/FRnOG BGP RouteServer please contact philippe at sysctl dot org. there are a lot bgp sessions down ( includen our own ) after adding neighbor 62.220.128.140 update-source interfacename number to the my router config the session restarted. Ueli -- The software said it requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
