[swinog] FYI [from nanog] use of DNS wildcards in TLD

2003-09-16 Thread netbsd 
[...]
Today VeriSign is adding a wildcard A record to the .com and .net
zones.  The wildcard record in the .net zone was activated from
10:45AM EDT to 13:30PM EDT.  The wildcard record in the .com zone is
being added now.  We have prepared a white paper describing VeriSign's
wildcard implementation, which is available here:

http://www.verisign.com/resources/gd/sitefinder/implementation.pdf

julien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

Re: [swinog] FYI [from nanog] use of DNS wildcards in TLD

2003-09-16 Thread Fredy Kuenzler 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today VeriSign is adding a wildcard A record to the .com and .net 
zones.  The wildcard record in the .net zone was activated from 
10:45AM EDT to 13:30PM EDT.  The wildcard record in the .com zone is 
being added now.  We have prepared a white paper describing
VeriSign's wildcard implementation, which is available here:

http://www.verisign.com/resources/gd/sitefinder/implementation.pdf
Anyone mistyping is forwarded to http://sitefinder.verisign.com/index.jsp

I'm gonna register *.ch and *.li now. Some extra traffic is rather nice
(a lot of $$$banners and $$$popups), isn't it?
F.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

Re: [swinog] FYI [from nanog] use of DNS wildcards in TLD

2003-09-16 Thread Nik Hug 

- Original Message - 
From: Fredy Kuenzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[..]
 I'm gonna register *.ch and *.li now. Some extra traffic is rather nice
 (a lot of $$$banners and $$$popups), isn't it?

*.ch for Fredy is fine with me - and *.com and *.net for versign also. 
Because I will take .*  

nik




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

Re: [swinog] FYI [from nanog] use of DNS wildcards in TLD

2003-09-16 Thread Matthias Leisi 

*.ch for Fredy is fine with me - and *.com and *.net for versign also. 
Because I will take .*  
Makes nice mail addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-)

-- Matthias

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

Re: [swinog] FYI [from nanog] use of DNS wildcards in TLD

2003-09-16 Thread Pascal Gloor 
 Makes nice mail addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-)

r@@t is even better and is RFC compliant.. as t is the TLD and r@ the
alias (yes @ is allowed in the alias :-P)


Pascal

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

Re: [swinog] FYI [from nanog] use of DNS wildcards in TLD

2003-09-16 Thread Fredy Kuenzler 
Matthias Leisi wrote:
*.ch for Fredy is fine with me - and *.com and *.net for versign also. 
Because I will take .*  
Makes nice mail addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-)
No prob, we show a lot of valid mail addrs with the storage folder 
/dev/null %-]

F.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

Re: [swinog] FYI [from nanog] use of DNS wildcards in TLD

2003-09-16 Thread Thomas Hug 
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:33, Matthias Leisi wrote:

  *.ch for Fredy is fine with me - and *.com and *.net for versign also.
  Because I will take .*

 Makes nice mail addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-)

another bad thing about this stupid idea is that the
reject_unknown_sender_domain rules in the mailserver won't work
anymore :(

-tom
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/