[swinog] Received some fun letter from UVEK ?

2003-02-11 Thread Pascal Gloor
I hope we're all having a big party together tonite to welcome that nice
document

- what are we doing to do?
- go down to the street with banners?
- try to implement as best as possible, even if it doesnt exactly fit in
the requirements ?
- I remember Orange communications has been involved in the creation of
this law and.. I m pretty sure they wont be ready on time
- Start a cookies business (my well known sentence :-P)
- We could do nothing and pay the fines (are those fines already
defined?)

so !?!?! use swinog! lets work together

We could open a Working-Group for Lawful Interception.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)

P.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/



AW: [swinog] Received some fun letter from UVEK ?

2003-02-11 Thread Steven Glogger
hi pascal

the shitty letter about 'packet switched services / delivery of intercepted
electronic mail'?
hmm i don't know what to do with it :)

 - what are we doing to do?
drink tea and eat cookies. and use this letter as notice paper for further
swinog meetings :)

 - go down to the street with banners?
not good idea. this is confidential. if we go on street with banners it's
not confidential at all :)

 - try to implement as best as possible, even if it doesnt
  exactly fit in the requirements ?
sounds good. haven't you received that damn spam from 'khamsin security' ?
(we developped bblabla.. server..blabla.. LIMES MailControl...blabla..).

 - I remember Orange communications has been involved in the
 creation of  this law and.. I m pretty sure they wont be ready on
time
:-)

 - Start a cookies business (my well known sentence :-P)
i prefer to open a rice plantage in the south of bolivia :)

 - We could do nothing and pay the fines (are those fines already
 defined?)
dunno... i think this is not an good idea. won't be cheap.

 so !?!?! use swinog! lets work together
so, why don't we develop an open-source software? (see older swinog mails)

 We could open a Working-Group for Lawful Interception.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
would be a good idea. but remember the 'classified/confidential' status of
the letter.

-steven


 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im
 Auftrag von Pascal Gloor
 Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2003 14:24
 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Betreff: [swinog] Received some fun letter from UVEK ?


 I hope we're all having a big party together tonite to welcome that nice
 document

 - what are we doing to do?
 - go down to the street with banners?
 - try to implement as best as possible, even if it doesnt
 exactly fit in
 the requirements ?
 - I remember Orange communications has been involved in the
 creation of
 this law and.. I m pretty sure they wont be ready on time
 - Start a cookies business (my well known sentence :-P)
 - We could do nothing and pay the fines (are those fines already
 defined?)

 so !?!?! use swinog! lets work together

 We could open a Working-Group for Lawful Interception.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)

 P.

 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/



RE: [swinog] Received some fun letter from UVEK ?

2003-02-11 Thread Michel Renfer

would be a good idea. but remember the 'classified/confidential' status of
the letter.

Why are this specifiations classified? It is such a big secret? *huh* 

From my part i don't see any problem. Or have you subscribe some sort of
Lawful interception NDA ?

regards,
mike
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/



Re: [swinog] Received some fun letter from UVEK ?

2003-02-11 Thread Pascal Gloor
 not good idea. this is confidential. if we go on street with banners it's
 not confidential at all :)

 would be a good idea. but remember the 'classified/confidential' status of
 the letter.

Sure, the content of the letter is confidential, but dont forget that 99% of
the letter content is covered by a document on a public website 
http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog4/intercept.zip

We still have to work together ! Why would we do 200 times the same thing ?

I still propose an [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be opened asap. Fredy can you do that?

P.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/



R: [swinog] Received some fun letter from UVEK ?

2003-02-11 Thread Manuel Wenger
 From my part i don't see any problem. Or have you subscribe some sort of Lawful 
interception NDA ?

No, you haven't, but I've asked a lawyer, and yes - a law exists saying that the Swiss 
guvm't can send you classified letters, and you're supposed to treat them this way. 
Otherwise you could face put the usual punishments here

Anyway, I think it would be a great idea to open a mailing list to work together on 
this problem. Basically we all received the letter here. UVEK also told me that I'm 
allowed to disclose the information contained in their letters to anyone cooperating 
with the ISP in order to comply with the requirements (ie. I'm allowed to send the 
letters to the company who sold me the mail server, if I'm willing to pay them to 
implement the requirements). 

Hope this helps

Regards
Manuel


___
Ticinocom SA - Via dei Pioppi 10 - 6616 Losone
Tel 0844 007070 - Fax 0844 007071
http://www.ticino.com
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/



Re: [swinog] Received some fun letter from UVEK ?

2003-02-11 Thread Fredy Kuenzler
Pascal Gloor wrote:

I still propose an [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be opened asap. Fredy can you do that?


Ok, will do until tomorrow evening. Anyone able to provide some MhonArc 
mail archive functionality, which allows password protected archive / 
search?

F.



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/