Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] buildsys: allow building without libnotify
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:36, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote: This patch makes the libnotify dependency optional and doesn't build the systemd-gnome-ask-password-agent utility if libnotify is not available. Since libnotify = 0.7.0 requires gtk+-3.0, this patch may be useful for environments where upgrading Gtk is not an option. Yeah, would be good to solve that. Maybe that's the simplest way to do it. One other option would be to use some #ifdef in vala und also support the still common older libnotify. Unfortunately libnotify just broke and both versions can't be parallel installed. And Fedora seems to be the only distro at the moment, which can use the new libnotify, and does not require the old one to be around. libnotify 0.7 does not require gtk at all. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] buildsys: allow building without libnotify
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote: * Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:36, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote: This patch makes the libnotify dependency optional and doesn't build the systemd-gnome-ask-password-agent utility if libnotify is not available. Since libnotify = 0.7.0 requires gtk+-3.0, this patch may be useful for environments where upgrading Gtk is not an option. Yeah, would be good to solve that. Maybe that's the simplest way to do it. One other option would be to use some #ifdef in vala und also support the still common older libnotify. Unfortunately libnotify just broke and both versions can't be parallel installed. And Fedora seems to be the only distro at the moment, which can use the new libnotify, and does not require the old one to be around. libnotify 0.7 does not require gtk at all. Well, the tests need gtk, so perhaps libnotify's configure script needs a --disable-tests option so it can be built without the gtk dependency. Will you accept a patch? Thats just a build dependency, but sure, why not. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] buildsys: allow building without libnotify
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote: * Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:36, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote: This patch makes the libnotify dependency optional and doesn't build the systemd-gnome-ask-password-agent utility if libnotify is not available. Since libnotify = 0.7.0 requires gtk+-3.0, this patch may be useful for environments where upgrading Gtk is not an option. Yeah, would be good to solve that. Maybe that's the simplest way to do it. One other option would be to use some #ifdef in vala und also support the still common older libnotify. Unfortunately libnotify just broke and both versions can't be parallel installed. And Fedora seems to be the only distro at the moment, which can use the new libnotify, and does not require the old one to be around. libnotify 0.7 does not require gtk at all. I was explained that libnotify 0.7 requires glib 2.27. And it is not compatible with gtk2 and/or Gnome2 - it was accidentally updated in Madriva and had to be reverted to 2.26 because things started to break. And glib 2.26/2.27 apparently cannot be installed in parallel. Personally I find it easier to revert single commit than maintain patch to enable build on top of this one. One ends up with additional patch both ways. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] buildsys: allow building without libnotify
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote: libnotify 0.7 does not require gtk at all. Hmm, whatever it is, there is an incompatible change, and the old an the new version can not be installed in parallel, isn't it? And all others besides Fedora are stuck with the old version which does not work with the code in systemd, right? Yes. There's an area of diminishing returns when making things parallel installable. You don't want teeny, unstable libraries to grow parallel versions, really. In this case, we decided for one-time porting pain. Of course, distributions may still decide the other way, and introduce a libnotify06 package... ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] buildsys: allow building without libnotify
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 15:50, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote: libnotify 0.7 does not require gtk at all. Hmm, whatever it is, there is an incompatible change, and the old an the new version can not be installed in parallel, isn't it? And all others besides Fedora are stuck with the old version which does not work with the code in systemd, right? Yes. There's an area of diminishing returns when making things parallel installable. You don't want teeny, unstable libraries to grow parallel versions, really. In this case, we decided for one-time porting pain. Sure no problem, it's just that things got a bit fast now. Seems everybody woke up now and gets old stuff cleaned up. :) Of course, distributions may still decide the other way, and introduce a libnotify06 package... Sure, that's the default for Debian/Ubuntu/SUSE, to have rpm names for libs with the so version: libnotify-devel-0.6.0-1.2.x86_64 libnotify1-0.6.0-1.2.x86_64 libnotify-tools-0.6.0-1.2.x86_64 I guess the so version is now 2? But the problem remains that the devel package has conflicting files then. :) Kay ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] build-sys: distribute introspect.awk
On Wed, 24.11.10 19:49, Thierry Reding (thierry.red...@avionic-design.de) wrote: Thanks. Both patches applied! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Remove Gentoo specific xdm.service
That unity pulls in OpenRC which in turn pulls in most of legacy system that causes lots of troubles as it is too smart, thus not recommended. Moreover, SystemD developers seems to agree that a service file per DM is the best approach, so having gdm.service, kdm.service, slim.service is better than a single wrapper for them. --- Makefile.am | 12 units/gentoo/Makefile|1 - units/gentoo/xdm.service | 17 - 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) delete mode 12 units/gentoo/Makefile delete mode 100644 units/gentoo/xdm.service diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index 694ec57..eb44099 100644 --- a/Makefile.am +++ b/Makefile.am @@ -333,10 +333,6 @@ dist_systemunit_DATA += \ units/fedora/plymouth-halt.service endif -if TARGET_GENTOO -dist_systemunit_DATA += \ - units/gentoo/xdm.service -endif if TARGET_ARCH dist_systemunit_DATA += \ @@ -1308,14 +1304,6 @@ if TARGET_FEDORA rm -f display-manager.service \ $(LN_S) $(systemunitdir)/display-manager.service display-manager.service ) endif -if TARGET_GENTOO - ( cd $(DESTDIR)$(systemunitdir) \ - rm -f display-manager.service \ - $(LN_S) xdm.service display-manager.service ) - ( cd $(DESTDIR)$(systemunitdir)/graphical.target.wants \ - rm -f display-manager.service \ - $(LN_S) $(systemunitdir)/display-manager.service display-manager.service ) -endif if TARGET_DEBIAN_OR_UBUNTU ( cd $(DESTDIR)$(systemunitdir) \ rm -f runlevel5.target \ diff --git a/units/gentoo/Makefile b/units/gentoo/Makefile deleted file mode 12 index 50be211..000 --- a/units/gentoo/Makefile +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -../../src/Makefile \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/units/gentoo/xdm.service b/units/gentoo/xdm.service deleted file mode 100644 index b94c6a8..000 --- a/units/gentoo/xdm.service +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ -# This file is part of systemd. -# -# systemd is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it -# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by -# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or -# (at your option) any later version. - -[Unit] -Description=Display Manager -After=syslog.target dbus.target hald.service - -[Service] -ExecStart=/etc/init.d/xdm start - -[Install] -Alias=display-manager.service -WantedBy=graphical.target -- 1.7.2.2 ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 15 (and 14)
Heya, I just released systemd 15: http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-15.tar.bz2 (30min before this relese I rolled v14; however an important bug was identified shortly after the release which caused me to prep v15 right-away.) Changes between v13 and v15: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (1): units: Remove Gentoo specific xdm.service Kay Sievers (1): mount_cgroup_controllers: expect 2 items from fscanf() Lennart Poettering (22): Revert Revert fsck: add new -l switch to fsck mount options man: reorder things to follow the same order everywhere units: move a couple of units from base.target to sysinit.target man: document /etc/hostname man: document /etc/vconsole.conf man: document locale.conf man: document /etc/os-release man: document /etc/modules-load.d/ systemctl: redirect enable/disable to chkconfig if applicable mount: do not try to mount disable cgroup controllers systemctl: don't return LSB status error codes for systemctl show man: make clear that VERSION and VERSION_ID is not mandatory in os-release.5 swap: order file-based swap devices after remount-rootfs logger: fix error handling units: simplify shutdown scripts update TODO mount: trivial typo fix build-sys: get rid of special fedor install target manager: bump up max number of units to 128K bump version in preparation for release dbus: use the right data slot allocator build-sys: prepare release 15 Thierry Reding (3): build-sys: allow cross-compilation build-sys: fix out-of-tree build build-sys: distribute introspect.awk Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
