[systemd-devel] How to Test systemd on F14?

2010-12-30 Thread Garry T. Williams
I installed systemd on Fedora 14 and added init=/bin/systemd to my
kernel boot parameters.  Initially I had no problems: boot to
graphical.target is fine.  I wanted to run through the test cases I
found at

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_basic
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_tools

I encountered a problem that makes me think I'm missing something.

ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target /etc/systemd/system/default.target
reboot and now in terminal:

ga...@vfr$ runlevel
N 3
ga...@vfr$

But...

[r...@vfr ~]# telinit 5
telinit: Failed to connect to socket /com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection
refused
[r...@vfr ~]# init 5
init: Failed to connect to socket /com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection
refused
[r...@vfr ~]#

Now relink graphical.target, but reboot still to terminal.  :-(

Tried systemctl start graphical.target and got (in log):

Dec 29 15:15:11 vfr systemd[1]: ge...@tty1.service/stop would stop a 
running service.
Dec 29 15:15:11 vfr systemd[1]: Deleting ge...@tty1.service/stop to 
minimize impact.

Is this supposed to work?  How do I get back to the graphical target?

-- 
Garry T. Williams
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] How to Test systemd on F14?

2010-12-30 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi,

AFAIK systemd is not supported on F14 and now nobody cares.

I think that if you want to test it on F14 you need to build a few things:
- systemd
- initscripts
- udev
- kernel (perhaps)

2010/12/30 Garry T. Williams gtwilli...@gmail.com:
 I installed systemd on Fedora 14 and added init=/bin/systemd to my
 kernel boot parameters.  Initially I had no problems: boot to
 graphical.target is fine.  I wanted to run through the test cases I
 found at

    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_basic
    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_tools

 I encountered a problem that makes me think I'm missing something.

 ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target 
 /etc/systemd/system/default.target
 reboot and now in terminal:

    ga...@vfr$ runlevel
    N 3
    ga...@vfr$

 But...

    [r...@vfr ~]# telinit 5
    telinit: Failed to connect to socket /com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection
    refused
    [r...@vfr ~]# init 5
    init: Failed to connect to socket /com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection
    refused
    [r...@vfr ~]#

 Now relink graphical.target, but reboot still to terminal.  :-(

 Tried systemctl start graphical.target and got (in log):

    Dec 29 15:15:11 vfr systemd[1]: ge...@tty1.service/stop would stop a 
 running service.
    Dec 29 15:15:11 vfr systemd[1]: Deleting ge...@tty1.service/stop to 
 minimize impact.

 Is this supposed to work?  How do I get back to the graphical target?

 --
 Garry T. Williams
 ___
 systemd-devel mailing list
 systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel




-- 
Best regards,
Michal

Sent from my fscking awesome Black Hole Generator
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] How to Test systemd on F14?

2010-12-30 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 05:04:25PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
 Hi,
 
 AFAIK systemd is not supported on F14 and now nobody cares.
 
 I think that if you want to test it on F14 you need to build a few things:
 - systemd
 - initscripts
 - udev
 - kernel (perhaps)


  Not really.  I'm using systemd on most of my F14 machines.  Packaged
version (v10) is quite old and prone to bugs, but it works most of the time.

  Original poster problems can be solved by installing sysvinit-systemd
package instead of sysvinit-upstart.

-- 
Tomasz Torcz   Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.plwagon filled with backup tapes. -- Jim Gray

___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] How to Test systemd on F14?

2010-12-30 Thread Garry T. Williams
On Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:03:13 Tomasz Torcz wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 05:04:25PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
  Hi,
  
  AFAIK systemd is not supported on F14 and now nobody cares.
  
  I think that if you want to test it on F14 you need to build a few things:
  - systemd
  - initscripts
  - udev
  - kernel (perhaps)
 
   Not really.  I'm using systemd on most of my F14 machines.
 Packaged version (v10) is quite old and prone to bugs, but it works
 most of the time.
 
   Original poster problems can be solved by installing
 sysvinit-systemd package instead of sysvinit-upstart.

Ah, I take it that I need to upgrade to rawhide if I want to do any
meaningful testing.  Thanks.

-- 
Garry T. Williams
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


[systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: remaining spelling fixes

2010-12-30 Thread Miklos Vajna
---
 man/pam_systemd.xml |4 ++--
 man/shutdown.xml|2 +-
 man/systemd.conf.xml|6 +++---
 man/systemd.exec.xml|4 ++--
 man/systemd.service.xml |8 
 man/systemd.unit.xml|6 +++---
 man/tmpfiles.d.xml  |6 +++---
 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/man/pam_systemd.xml b/man/pam_systemd.xml
index d43ed23..cd806da 100644
--- a/man/pam_systemd.xml
+++ b/man/pam_systemd.xml
@@ -205,9 +205,9 @@
 termoptioncontrollers=/option/term
 
 listitemparaTakes a comma
-seperated list of cgroup controllers
+separated list of cgroup controllers
 in which hierarchies a user/session
-cgroup will be created by defautl for
+cgroup will be created by default for
 each user logging in. If ommited,
 defaults to 'cpu', meaning that in
 addition to creating per-user and
diff --git a/man/shutdown.xml b/man/shutdown.xml
index d6bdad3..c8c4b54 100644
--- a/man/shutdown.xml
+++ b/man/shutdown.xml
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
 implied./para
 
 paraNote that to specify a wall message you must
-speciy a time argument, too./para
+specify a time argument, too./para
 
 paraIf the time argument is used, 5 minutes
 before the system goes down the
diff --git a/man/systemd.conf.xml b/man/systemd.conf.xml
index 32eae2b..54a8398 100644
--- a/man/systemd.conf.xml
+++ b/man/systemd.conf.xml
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
 listitemparaConfigures various
 parameters of basic manager
 operation. These options may be
-overriden by the respective command
+overridden by the respective command
 line arguments. See
 
citerefentryrefentrytitlesystemd/refentrytitlemanvolnum1/manvolnum/citerefentry
 for details about these command line
@@ -121,10 +121,10 @@
 create per-service cgroups
 automatically, in addition to the
 name=systemd named hierarchy. Defaults
-to 'cpu'. Takes a space seperated list
+to 'cpu'. Takes a space separated list
 of controller names. Pass an empty
 string to ensure that systemd does not
-touch any hiearchies but its
+touch any hierarchies but its
 own./para/listitem
 /varlistentry
 /variablelist
diff --git a/man/systemd.exec.xml b/man/systemd.exec.xml
index 7c8005c..b24792b 100644
--- a/man/systemd.exec.xml
+++ b/man/systemd.exec.xml
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@
 available options are identical to
 those of
 varnameStandardOutput=/varname,
-whith one exception: if set to
+with one exception: if set to
 optioninherit/option the file
 descriptor used for standard output is
 duplicated for standard error. This
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@
 restricting access with these options
 does not extend to submounts of a
 directory. You must list submounts
-separately in these setttings to
+separately in these settings to
 ensure the same limited access. These
 options may be specified more than
 once in which case all directories
diff --git a/man/systemd.service.xml b/man/systemd.service.xml
index c77992d..e4fa6bc 100644
--- a/man/systemd.service.xml
+++ b/man/systemd.service.xml
@@ -271,11 +271,11 @@
 literal-/literal an exit code of
 the command normally considered a
 failure (i.e. non-zero exit status or
-abormal exit due to signal) is ignored
+abnormal exit due to signal) is ignored
 and considered success. If both
 literal-/literal and