Re: [systemd-devel] Increasing the default RLIMIT_NOFILE
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 09:56:18AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 29.10.18 08:09, Andrew Eikum (aei...@codeweavers.com) wrote: > > This is about the increase in the default RLIMIT_NOFILE to 256k, see > > commit 8aeb1d317 and this pull request > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10244 > > > > I think this is a great change. However, we have seen real > > applications using over 300k handles when using the eventfd-backed > > synchronization primitives implementation in Wine. Debian-derived > > distros have set this limit to 1024*1024 by default for years. Raising > > the limit to this number would help these applications, and would > > unify around a number that is already in common use. > > So, I prepped this PR now: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10780 > > It's not quite at the 1M yet you requested. I am not sure we should go > to the max right away, hence 512K, as something that is higher than > the 300K you saw, but still leaves some room upwards. > Thanks! > I hope this makes sense, > 512K is probably enough for our purposes, though it's still fairly tight given we've seen over 300K in practice. I don't understand why unifying with the value Debian has used for a long time isn't the preferred option. But anyway, this is hardly in my area of understanding. It's obviously your call to make. Thanks for your time, Andrew ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] Debugging active timers that do not trigger
On 11/8/18 11:46 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > It is possible that system never ends booting. Do you have any pending > jobs (systemctl list-jobs)? What "systemctl is-system-running" says? I don't think this is the case. The OnBootSec= is taken relatively to the instant when the kernel started counting time (on Linux implemented via CLOCK_MONOTONIC). @Daniel, is it possible there are some daemon-reloads running concurrently with the timer? More precisely, can it happen the timer expires exactly when systemd reloads? Michal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] Increasing the default RLIMIT_NOFILE
On Mo, 29.10.18 08:09, Andrew Eikum (aei...@codeweavers.com) wrote: > Hi all, > > This is about the increase in the default RLIMIT_NOFILE to 256k, see > commit 8aeb1d317 and this pull request > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10244 > > I think this is a great change. However, we have seen real > applications using over 300k handles when using the eventfd-backed > synchronization primitives implementation in Wine. Debian-derived > distros have set this limit to 1024*1024 by default for years. Raising > the limit to this number would help these applications, and would > unify around a number that is already in common use. So, I prepped this PR now: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10780 It's not quite at the 1M yet you requested. I am not sure we should go to the max right away, hence 512K, as something that is higher than the 300K you saw, but still leaves some room upwards. I hope this makes sense, Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
