Re: [systemd-devel] remove Support + Documentation message?
On Di, 30.04.19 18:03, linuxfr...@gmx.at (linuxfr...@gmx.at) wrote: > Hi Zbyszek, > > ok, all your points taken. > > > Do you mean that this *S**upport + Documentation* message was or should > be removed? > > Well Manjaro takes all the ARCH packages. We are +/- 2 Weeks behind ARCH > for testing reasons. > > Well if you say so, i'll tell them to remove this. But i think this > comes from ARCH. > > > Do you have some link when this was removed years ago, just in case > someone does not belive me... The idea is that downstreams use the "support-url" meson build-time option to direct support requests to one of their own sites. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
[systemd-devel] remove Support + Documentation message?
Hi Zbyszek, ok, all your points taken. Do you mean that this *S**upport + Documentation* message was or should be removed? Well Manjaro takes all the ARCH packages. We are +/- 2 Weeks behind ARCH for testing reasons. Well if you say so, i'll tell them to remove this. But i think this comes from ARCH. Do you have some link when this was removed years ago, just in case someone does not belive me... --- first start to complain at your distribution for that nonsense which was removed from systemd years ago: -- Support:https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel -- Documentation:man:core(5) -- regards LF On 30.04.19 14:00, systemd-devel-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote: Send systemd-devel mailing list submissions to systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to systemd-devel-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org You can reach the person managing the list at systemd-devel-ow...@lists.freedesktop.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of systemd-devel digest..." Today's Topics: 4. Re: systemd-coredump[2529]: Process 2326 (xfwm4) of user 1000 dumped core maybe because of lightdm[2482]: gkr-pam: unable to locate daemon control file (Reindl Harald) -- -- Message: 4 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:43:40 +0200 From: Reindl Harald To:systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-coredump[2529]: Process 2326 (xfwm4) of user 1000 dumped core maybe because of lightdm[2482]: gkr-pam: unable to locate daemon control file Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 --- first start to complain at your distribution for that nonsense which was removed from systemd years ago: -- Support:https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel -- Documentation:man:core(5) -- ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] Again, why this strange behavior implied by "auto" in fstab ?
On 4/30/19 11:44 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am Di., 30. Apr. 2019 um 11:20 Uhr schrieb Franck Bui : >> Just in case, this "feature" has been finally removed since v242 (commit >> 42b8142d7). > > I can't find a commit with that id > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/42b8142d7 > Sorry it's 142b8142d7bb84f07ac33fc00527a4d48ac8ef9f. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] Again, why this strange behavior implied by "auto" in fstab ?
Am Di., 30. Apr. 2019 um 11:20 Uhr schrieb Franck Bui : > Just in case, this "feature" has been finally removed since v242 (commit > 42b8142d7). I can't find a commit with that id https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/42b8142d7 -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] Again, why this strange behavior implied by "auto" in fstab ?
On 1/23/18 3:47 PM, Franck Bui wrote: > Hi, > > I'm resurrecting an old but recurrent issue here which I'd like to > clarify one more time. > > Basically, systemd mounts all filesystems listed in /etc/fstab (unless > "noauto" is used) which is good since that's how fstab was used when > SysV was the init system. > > However it also introduced another "feature" which basically > automagically mounts a filesystem (listed in fstab) every time its > backend device re-appears. > Just in case, this "feature" has been finally removed since v242 (commit 42b8142d7). ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
