On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 15:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > From: Harald Hoyer <har...@redhat.com> > > > > According to Brent Baude <bba...@redhat.com>, who provided the patch, > > IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all. > > What is "support" supposed to mean? Does that mean that the silicon for > PPC32LE has and will never exist? Or does this mean that they are simply > not interested in supporting Linux on ppc32le like this with support > employees and stuff? > > I think if the silicon exists and people play around with it, we should > keep the thing probably. However, if this is a theoretic architecture > only, then let's kill it. > > > --- > > src/shared/architecture.h | 5 ----- > > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/shared/architecture.h b/src/shared/architecture.h > > index 71c79b1..2bbfb8a 100644 > > --- a/src/shared/architecture.h > > +++ b/src/shared/architecture.h > > @@ -90,13 +90,8 @@ Architecture uname_architecture(void); > > # define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE "powerpc64le-linux-gnu" > > # endif > > #elif defined(__powerpc__) > > -# if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN > > # define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC > > # define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE "powerpc-linux-gnu" > > -# else > > -# define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC_LE > > -# error "Missing LIB_ARCH_TUPLE for PPCLE" > > -# endif > > #elif defined(__ia64__) > > # define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_IA64 > > # define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE "ia64-linux-gnu" > > > Lennart >
Yeah it does technically exist as your follow up email suggests. Nobody at IBM is interested in supporting it. So I am cool with leaving it in. Brent _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel