Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/4] [RFC v1] gdbus: Preliminary kdbus-support patches

2013-11-22 Thread Karol Lewandowski
On 11/22/2013 01:32 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Karol Lewandowski
> mailto:k.lewando...@samsung.com>> wrote:
> 
> On 11/21/2013 08:28 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 16:35 +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> >
> >> Truth is that gio guys already merged tizen's glib-kdbus
> modifications
> >> into their own devel branch without us even knowing, not to mention
> >> proposing it.

> > If you're referring to
> > https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/log/?h=tizen/kdbus-dev
> > I think Ryan just wanted to put the patches in a place where he could
> > (more easily) see them and work on them.

> What I would like to avoid is us and Ryan (and other guys) working
> on the same piece of code, effectively forking glib multiple times
> for kdbus. We are quite open about our work - it just took us a while
> to bring changes to the state where these are more-or-less ready for
> public consumption. :)

> I pointed Ryan at the branch when I learned about it, and he just
> imported it to have a first look at it. I don't think there was any
> intention to 'work' on this code right away. Sorry if this startled you.

No problem here - we are quite happy that upstream is interested in
this.

> And thanks for pushing out this cleaned up version, I appreciate it!

Thanks for bringing this into the light and, consequently - motivating
us to clean things up.

Cheers,
Karol

___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/4] [RFC v1] gdbus: Preliminary kdbus-support patches

2013-11-22 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Karol Lewandowski  wrote:

> On 11/21/2013 08:28 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 16:35 +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> >
> >> Truth is that gio guys already merged tizen's glib-kdbus modifications
> >> into their own devel branch without us even knowing, not to mention
> >> proposing it.
> >
> > If you're referring to
> > https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/log/?h=tizen/kdbus-dev
> > I think Ryan just wanted to put the patches in a place where he could
> > (more easily) see them and work on them.
>
> What I would like to avoid is us and Ryan (and other guys) working
> on the same piece of code, effectively forking glib multiple times
> for kdbus. We are quite open about our work - it just took us a while
> to bring changes to the state where these are more-or-less ready for
> public consumption. :)
>

Hey,

I pointed Ryan at the branch when I learned about it, and he just imported
it to have a first look at it. I don't think there was any intention to
'work' on this code right away. Sorry if this startled you. And thanks for
pushing out this cleaned up version, I appreciate it!

Matthias
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/4] [RFC v1] gdbus: Preliminary kdbus-support patches

2013-11-22 Thread Karol Lewandowski
On 11/21/2013 08:28 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 16:35 +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> 
>> Truth is that gio guys already merged tizen's glib-kdbus modifications
>> into their own devel branch without us even knowing, not to mention
>> proposing it.  
> 
> If you're referring to
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/log/?h=tizen/kdbus-dev
> I think Ryan just wanted to put the patches in a place where he could
> (more easily) see them and work on them.

What I would like to avoid is us and Ryan (and other guys) working
on the same piece of code, effectively forking glib multiple times
for kdbus. We are quite open about our work - it just took us a while
to bring changes to the state where these are more-or-less ready for
public consumption. :)

> The "devel branch" of glib is "master", and anything landing there needs
> to go through peer review.  wip/ and other branches are more freeform.

Thanks for this explanation, I wasn't aware of all these details.

Cheers,
Karol
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


[systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/4] [RFC v1] gdbus: Preliminary kdbus-support patches

2013-11-21 Thread Karol Lewandowski
[ Cced systemd-devel@ and dev@tizen mailing lists in case someone
  there would be interested too. ]

Folks,

We have recently started experimenting with possibilities of
adding kdbus-support to glib's gio.  Following patchset is
result of our work.

Please note this is cleanup of modifications available from
Tizen repositories (please see notes for details), rebased on
top of glib's master branch - 6f7d8f6294 ("gbacktrace: Print
out gdb exec errors correctly").


What we would like to accomplish by this RFC is to gather 
feedback if our approach for glib modifications is sound
for you (we do not know glib code that well).


In short:

 - This patchset adds ability for glib programs to connect
   to kdbus busses via

 DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=(kernel|kdbus):/dev/kdbus/0-kdbus/bus 

 - Library modifications are not all, it's required to have
   service handling org.freedesktop.DBus requests in userspace.

   Currently we use modified[3] dbus-daemon to for that
   purpose.

 - Basic functionality works - sending/receiving messages,
   signals, name registration, etc.

 - Last patch contains basic tests accompanied with README,
   please take a look there too.


We will be happy to hear any and all of your comments.

Thanks!


Notes:
==

This code originates from Tizen[1], and was imported[2] by
Ryan Lortie into glib's tizen/kdbus-dev branch.

  [1] 
https://review.tizen.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fglib.git;a=summary
  
  git://review.tizen.org/platform/upstream/glib kdbus-dev

  [2] https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/log/?h=tizen/kdbus-dev

We are the same people that did that work, precisely Lukasz Skalski
and Michal Eljasiewicz wrote all the code, I just gave it finishing
touches.

We think this patchset could replace glibs tizen/kdbus-dev iff you
think that it's worth to keep kdbus support code in main repo at
all. ;)   (At this point in time, that is!)

Moreover, we would be more than happy to work directly on that
branch, if you find it feasible.


kdbus-enabled dbus-daemon is available here:

  [3]  git://review.tizen.org/platform/upstream/dbus kdbus-dev

We are aware that in future it will be probably systemd role
to provide it (I've seen that Daniel Mack is already working
on it).


Karol Lewandowski (4):
  gdbus: Import kdbus interface header
  gdbus: Add preliminary implementation of kdbus support
  gdbus: Integrate kdbus into GDBus core
  gdbus: Add basic kdbus tests

 configure.ac  |   11 +
 gio/Makefile.am   |4 +
 gio/gdbusaddress.c|   80 +-
 gio/gdbusconnection.c |   20 +-
 gio/gdbusprivate.c|  211 +++-
 gio/gdbusprivate.h|8 +-
 gio/giotypes.h|   33 +
 gio/gkdbus.c  | 1112 +
 gio/gkdbus.h  |  113 +++
 gio/gkdbusconnection.c|  196 
 gio/gkdbusconnection.h|   91 ++
 gio/kdbus.h   |  436 
 gio/tests/Makefile.am |   13 +
 gio/tests/kdbus-test/README   |  108 ++
 gio/tests/kdbus-test/gdbus-example-kdbus-client.c |   51 +
 gio/tests/kdbus-test/gdbus-example-kdbus-server.c |  117 +++
 16 files changed, 2572 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gio/gkdbus.c
 create mode 100644 gio/gkdbus.h
 create mode 100644 gio/gkdbusconnection.c
 create mode 100644 gio/gkdbusconnection.h
 create mode 100644 gio/kdbus.h
 create mode 100644 gio/tests/kdbus-test/README
 create mode 100644 gio/tests/kdbus-test/gdbus-example-kdbus-client.c
 create mode 100644 gio/tests/kdbus-test/gdbus-example-kdbus-server.c

-- 
1.8.4.rc3

___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel