[systemd-devel] optional kdbus enablement

2015-09-10 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Shouldn't the dbus1-generator disable the dbus.service & dbus.socket
by symlinking them to /dev/null ?

Or for example, should the dbus.server|socket units to have condition
whether or not kdbus is available at runtime?

Or how does one resolve the conflict between the bus-proxy and dbus?

-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.
Pura Vida!

https://clearlinux.org
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] optional kdbus enablement

2015-09-10 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
oh, it is. Excellent. Not sure how I missed that last time I was
testing, never mind me.

On 10 September 2015 at 16:53, Dimitri John Ledkov
 wrote:
> Shouldn't the dbus1-generator disable the dbus.service & dbus.socket
> by symlinking them to /dev/null ?
>
> Or for example, should the dbus.server|socket units to have condition
> whether or not kdbus is available at runtime?
>
> Or how does one resolve the conflict between the bus-proxy and dbus?
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dimitri.
> Pura Vida!
>
> https://clearlinux.org
> Open Source Technology Center
> Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ.



-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.
Pura Vida!

https://clearlinux.org
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel