Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] sd-resolv: declare functions from .h public

2014-01-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 14.01.14 19:29, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:

 
 Hi Daniel,
 
 I guess we should only do this once we decide to export the API. I
 guess we won't be doing that for a few releases (we'll use it
 internally first to make sure it is the way we want it).
 
 Or are there any benefits to these annotations even when the symbols
 are not exported?

Well, sd-resolve is in the same situation here as sd-event or sd-bus
are: not public APIs yet, but probably very soon. And given that
sd-event, sd-bus, sd-memfd, ... all have the _public_ stuff sd-resolve.h
probably should too.

I'd merge the patch, alas it doesn't apply anymore. Daniel, could you
rebase please?

Also, the symbols exposed by sd_resolve need to be added to the .sym
file, too.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] sd-resolv: declare functions from .h public

2014-01-14 Thread Tom Gundersen
Hi Daniel,

I guess we should only do this once we decide to export the API. I
guess we won't be doing that for a few releases (we'll use it
internally first to make sure it is the way we want it).

Or are there any benefits to these annotations even when the symbols
are not exported?

-t

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Daniel Buch boogiewasth...@gmail.com wrote:
 ---
  src/libsystemd/sd-resolv.c | 38 +++---
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-resolv.c b/src/libsystemd/sd-resolv.c
 index b8288ba..cd79a6c 100644
 --- a/src/libsystemd/sd-resolv.c
 +++ b/src/libsystemd/sd-resolv.c
 @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void* thread_worker(void *p) {
  return NULL;
  }

 -sd_resolv_t* sd_resolv_new(unsigned n_proc) {
 +_public_ sd_resolv_t* sd_resolv_new(unsigned n_proc) {
  sd_resolv_t *resolv = NULL;
  int i, r;

 @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ fail:
  return NULL;
  }

 -void sd_resolv_free(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
 +_public_ void sd_resolv_free(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
  int i;
  int saved_errno = errno;
  unsigned p;
 @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ void sd_resolv_free(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
  errno = saved_errno;
  }

 -int sd_resolv_fd(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
 +_public_ int sd_resolv_fd(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
  assert(resolv);

  return resolv-fds[RESPONSE_RECV_FD];
 @@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ static int handle_response(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const 
 packet_t *packet, size_t l
  return 0;
  }

 -int sd_resolv_wait(sd_resolv_t *resolv, int block) {
 +_public_ int sd_resolv_wait(sd_resolv_t *resolv, int block) {
  int handled = 0;
  assert(resolv);

 @@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ static sd_resolv_query_t *alloc_query(sd_resolv_t 
 *resolv) {
  return q;
  }

 -sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_getaddrinfo(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const char 
 *node, const char *service, const struct addrinfo *hints) {
 +_public_ sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_getaddrinfo(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const 
 char *node, const char *service, const struct addrinfo *hints) {
  addrinfo_request_t data[BUFSIZE/sizeof(addrinfo_request_t) + 1] = {};
  addrinfo_request_t *req = data;
  sd_resolv_query_t *q;
 @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ fail:
  return NULL;
  }

 -int sd_resolv_getaddrinfo_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, sd_resolv_query_t* q, 
 struct addrinfo **ret_res) {
 +_public_ int sd_resolv_getaddrinfo_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, 
 sd_resolv_query_t* q, struct addrinfo **ret_res) {
  int ret;
  assert(resolv);
  assert(q);
 @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ int sd_resolv_getaddrinfo_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, 
 sd_resolv_query_t* q, struct
  return ret;
  }

 -sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_getnameinfo(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const struct 
 sockaddr *sa, socklen_t salen, int flags, int gethost, int getserv) {
 +_public_ sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_getnameinfo(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const 
 struct sockaddr *sa, socklen_t salen, int flags, int gethost, int getserv) {
  nameinfo_request_t data[BUFSIZE/sizeof(nameinfo_request_t) + 1] = {};
  nameinfo_request_t *req = data;
  sd_resolv_query_t *q;
 @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ fail:
  return NULL;
  }

 -int sd_resolv_getnameinfo_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, sd_resolv_query_t* q, 
 char *ret_host, size_t hostlen, char *ret_serv, size_t servlen) {
 +_public_ int sd_resolv_getnameinfo_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, 
 sd_resolv_query_t* q, char *ret_host, size_t hostlen, char *ret_serv, size_t 
 servlen) {
  int ret;
  assert(resolv);
  assert(q);
 @@ -1002,15 +1002,15 @@ fail:
  return NULL;
  }

 -sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_res_query(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const char 
 *dname, int class, int type) {
 +_public_ sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_res_query(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const 
 char *dname, int class, int type) {
  return resolv_res(resolv, REQUEST_RES_QUERY, dname, class, type);
  }

 -sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_res_search(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const char 
 *dname, int class, int type) {
 +_public_ sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_res_search(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const 
 char *dname, int class, int type) {
  return resolv_res(resolv, REQUEST_RES_SEARCH, dname, class, type);
  }

 -int sd_resolv_res_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, sd_resolv_query_t* q, unsigned 
 char **answer) {
 +_public_ int sd_resolv_res_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, sd_resolv_query_t* q, 
 unsigned char **answer) {
  int ret;
  assert(resolv);
  assert(q);
 @@ -1043,17 +1043,17 @@ int sd_resolv_res_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, 
 sd_resolv_query_t* q, unsigned char
  return ret  0 ? -errno : ret;
  }

 -sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_getnext(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
 +_public_ sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_getnext(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
  assert(resolv);
  return resolv-done_head;
  }

 -int sd_resolv_getnqueries(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
 +_public_ int 

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] sd-resolv: declare functions from .h public

2014-01-14 Thread Daniel Buch
Hi,

I'm perfectly fine if we skip this patch, and to my understanding there is
no benefits and only corresponds to external linkage.


2014/1/14 Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no

 Hi Daniel,

 I guess we should only do this once we decide to export the API. I
 guess we won't be doing that for a few releases (we'll use it
 internally first to make sure it is the way we want it).

 Or are there any benefits to these annotations even when the symbols
 are not exported?

 -t

 On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Daniel Buch boogiewasth...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  ---
   src/libsystemd/sd-resolv.c | 38 +++---
   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
 
  diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-resolv.c b/src/libsystemd/sd-resolv.c
  index b8288ba..cd79a6c 100644
  --- a/src/libsystemd/sd-resolv.c
  +++ b/src/libsystemd/sd-resolv.c
  @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void* thread_worker(void *p) {
   return NULL;
   }
 
  -sd_resolv_t* sd_resolv_new(unsigned n_proc) {
  +_public_ sd_resolv_t* sd_resolv_new(unsigned n_proc) {
   sd_resolv_t *resolv = NULL;
   int i, r;
 
  @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ fail:
   return NULL;
   }
 
  -void sd_resolv_free(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
  +_public_ void sd_resolv_free(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
   int i;
   int saved_errno = errno;
   unsigned p;
  @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ void sd_resolv_free(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
   errno = saved_errno;
   }
 
  -int sd_resolv_fd(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
  +_public_ int sd_resolv_fd(sd_resolv_t *resolv) {
   assert(resolv);
 
   return resolv-fds[RESPONSE_RECV_FD];
  @@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ static int handle_response(sd_resolv_t *resolv,
 const packet_t *packet, size_t l
   return 0;
   }
 
  -int sd_resolv_wait(sd_resolv_t *resolv, int block) {
  +_public_ int sd_resolv_wait(sd_resolv_t *resolv, int block) {
   int handled = 0;
   assert(resolv);
 
  @@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ static sd_resolv_query_t *alloc_query(sd_resolv_t
 *resolv) {
   return q;
   }
 
  -sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_getaddrinfo(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const
 char *node, const char *service, const struct addrinfo *hints) {
  +_public_ sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_getaddrinfo(sd_resolv_t *resolv,
 const char *node, const char *service, const struct addrinfo *hints) {
   addrinfo_request_t data[BUFSIZE/sizeof(addrinfo_request_t) + 1]
 = {};
   addrinfo_request_t *req = data;
   sd_resolv_query_t *q;
  @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ fail:
   return NULL;
   }
 
  -int sd_resolv_getaddrinfo_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, sd_resolv_query_t*
 q, struct addrinfo **ret_res) {
  +_public_ int sd_resolv_getaddrinfo_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv,
 sd_resolv_query_t* q, struct addrinfo **ret_res) {
   int ret;
   assert(resolv);
   assert(q);
  @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ int sd_resolv_getaddrinfo_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv,
 sd_resolv_query_t* q, struct
   return ret;
   }
 
  -sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_getnameinfo(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const
 struct sockaddr *sa, socklen_t salen, int flags, int gethost, int getserv) {
  +_public_ sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_getnameinfo(sd_resolv_t *resolv,
 const struct sockaddr *sa, socklen_t salen, int flags, int gethost, int
 getserv) {
   nameinfo_request_t data[BUFSIZE/sizeof(nameinfo_request_t) + 1]
 = {};
   nameinfo_request_t *req = data;
   sd_resolv_query_t *q;
  @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ fail:
   return NULL;
   }
 
  -int sd_resolv_getnameinfo_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, sd_resolv_query_t*
 q, char *ret_host, size_t hostlen, char *ret_serv, size_t servlen) {
  +_public_ int sd_resolv_getnameinfo_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv,
 sd_resolv_query_t* q, char *ret_host, size_t hostlen, char *ret_serv,
 size_t servlen) {
   int ret;
   assert(resolv);
   assert(q);
  @@ -1002,15 +1002,15 @@ fail:
   return NULL;
   }
 
  -sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_res_query(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const char
 *dname, int class, int type) {
  +_public_ sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_res_query(sd_resolv_t *resolv,
 const char *dname, int class, int type) {
   return resolv_res(resolv, REQUEST_RES_QUERY, dname, class,
 type);
   }
 
  -sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_res_search(sd_resolv_t *resolv, const char
 *dname, int class, int type) {
  +_public_ sd_resolv_query_t* sd_resolv_res_search(sd_resolv_t *resolv,
 const char *dname, int class, int type) {
   return resolv_res(resolv, REQUEST_RES_SEARCH, dname, class,
 type);
   }
 
  -int sd_resolv_res_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, sd_resolv_query_t* q,
 unsigned char **answer) {
  +_public_ int sd_resolv_res_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv, sd_resolv_query_t*
 q, unsigned char **answer) {
   int ret;
   assert(resolv);
   assert(q);
  @@ -1043,17 +1043,17 @@ int sd_resolv_res_done(sd_resolv_t *resolv,
 sd_resolv_query_t* q, unsigned char
   return ret  0 ? -errno : ret;
   }
 
  -sd_resolv_query_t*