Re: [systemd-devel] getting systemd 232 ready

2016-10-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 07:12:10PM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Martin Pitt  wrote:
> > Hello Zbigniew, Lennart, all,
> >
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2016-10-20  4:00 +]:
> >> Open bugs with v232 milestone [1]:
> >> [2] 
> >> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20milestone%3Av232%20-label%3Aresolve%20-label%3Ahas-pr
> >
> > None of those are a regression from 231, so we could easily move them
> > to 233. Should we?
> 
> I think #4408 is quite important for few reasons:
> a) I doubt it is only the journal that is broken. Maybe all the
> FDSTORE services.
> b) Things are not recovering if journald crashes. You will end up
> having no logs from all the services that connect to journal directly.
> 
> I didn't have time to figure out when things went south.
Agreed, #4408 looks like something we must fix before release.
There was some progress on #4322.
The rest are not as important. 

Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] getting systemd 232 ready

2016-10-21 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Zbigniew, Lennart, all,

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2016-10-20  4:00 +]:
> Open bugs with v232 milestone [1]:
> [2] 
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20milestone%3Av232%20-label%3Aresolve%20-label%3Ahas-pr

None of those are a regression from 231, so we could easily move them
to 233. Should we?

Thanks for pushing this!

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] getting systemd 232 ready

2016-10-21 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Martin Pitt  wrote:
> Hello Zbigniew, Lennart, all,
>
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2016-10-20  4:00 +]:
>> Open bugs with v232 milestone [1]:
>> [2] 
>> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20milestone%3Av232%20-label%3Aresolve%20-label%3Ahas-pr
>
> None of those are a regression from 231, so we could easily move them
> to 233. Should we?

I think #4408 is quite important for few reasons:
a) I doubt it is only the journal that is broken. Maybe all the
FDSTORE services.
b) Things are not recovering if journald crashes. You will end up
having no logs from all the services that connect to journal directly.

I didn't have time to figure out when things went south.

UMUT

>
> Thanks for pushing this!
>
> Martin
>
> --
> Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
> Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
> ___
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] getting systemd 232 ready

2016-10-20 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 20.10.16 04:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I was hoping systemd 232 would be released before systemd.conf as a
> nice simple release. Unfortunately before the conference started, there
> were too many regressions and bugs open. Since then people have been piling
> new stuff on top, which is good, but keeps delaying the release.
> 
> My proposal is to wrap 232 up, by fixing outstanding regressions, and a
> portion of open bugs tagged with the v232 milestone (see below).
> New stuff should wait until after the release.
> 
> 
> tl;dr version:
>  1. squash bugs and merge PRs with milestone:v232, but ignore any 
> label:resolve
>  2. revert "networkd: add dbus interface for lease raw options (#3528)"
>  3. profit ;)

Sounds all good to me. Let's move the resolved ones to milestone v233!

And let's try to focus on doing v233 quickly after v232, without doing
any new dev work in between, let's leave that for v234

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel