t-and-f: NYTimes.com Article: The Decline and Fall of Sports Ratings

2003-09-10 Thread francicash
This article from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sports are watched differently than they were during the era of the three-network 
universe. The bonds of loyalty to a nationally televised sport can be broken more 
easily because there is so much else to do and perhaps less patience. If Sampras is 
not playing Andre Agassi, viewers may flip to Sex and the City.



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/ advertisement ---\

Explore more of Starbucks at Starbucks.com.
http://www.starbucks.com/default.asp?ci=1015
\--/

The Decline and Fall of Sports Ratings

September 10, 2003
 By RICHARD SANDOMIR 




 

Down. That is where the ratings of most major sports events
went in the past year. Whether it was the World Series, the
N.B.A. finals, all four Grand Slam golf tournaments or the
recently completed United States Open, network ratings
tumbled. 

The declines, in some cases, were huge and led to record
ratings lows, and they could lead to networks' slowing the
growth in payments for future deals. 

With the National Basketball Association gone from NBC,
ratings for the finals on ABC this year dropped by more
than a third. Shaun Micheel's victory at the P.G.A.
Championship in August sent CBS's rating down 38 percent,
after ratings for Jim Furyk's triumph at the United States
Open fell by almost half on NBC. 

The prime-time United States Open women's tennis final,
created in 2001 as a Venus and Serena Williams perennial,
dropped 52 percent to a 2.5 for CBS last Saturday when one
Belgian, Justine Henin-Hardenne, defeated another, Kim
Clijsters. (Each rating point equals 1.07 million TV
households.) 

It has been a weird year; a confluence of factors put a
larger-than-usual dent in the viewership of major sports.
The war in Iraq drew viewers away in the spring, especially
from the N.C.A.A. men's basketball tournament (the
championship game rating fell 16 percent). Rain shortened
the Daytona 500 and caused days' worth of delays at the
United States Open, which also suffered from Pete Sampras's
retirement and injuries to the Williams sisters. Tiger
Woods was a factor in only one of golf's majors, and the
ratings drop-off ranged from 7 percent (the British Open)
to 44 percent (the United States Open). 

The N.B.A.'s decision to shift the bulk of its games to
cable, on ESPN and TNT, meant lower ratings for ABC, which
did not build the type of audience NBC had because it
carried far fewer games. 

The oases of strength in sports broadcasting continue to be
the National Football League (ABC's Buccaneers-Eagles game
was the highest-rated Monday night game in two years) and
Nascar, which has benefited greatly from moving its main
races from cable to NBC and Fox. When rain curtailed the
Daytona 500 last February, Fox said it was on its way to
posting its highest rating in years. 

Still, the overall direction of sports ratings is clear.
If you look at sports ratings over the past decade,
they've declined in general, said Ken Schanzer, the
president of NBC Sports. The question is whether the
amount of the decline this year is the start of a trend. 

Artie Bulgrin, ESPN's senior vice president for research,
said this year's declines were accelerated by a key segment
of viewers focused on the war in Iraq. 

The audience that paid closest attention to the news,
post-9/11, was males 18 to 34, and they were affected for a
period that forced sports to take a back seat, he said. 

He added: It's misleading to look at ratings for selected
events and conclude that a negative trend is happening.
Sports have never been healthier. 

Still, sports ratings are not immune to the erosion
throughout broadcast television, a trend linked to cable
and satellite TV, the Internet, home video and other
options. 

Ten years ago, the World Series had a 17.3 rating; last
year it fell to 11.9. The N.C.A.A. championship game
produced a 22.2 rating 10 years ago; this year it dipped to
12.6. 

Only eight years ago, the leading prime-time network
program, Seinfeld, averaged a 20.4 rating; this past
season the top show, C.S.I., generated a 16.3 

Ratings are smaller than ever, and the sports world is the
exaggerated tip of it, said Peter Gardiner, chief media
officer of the advertising agency Deutsch Inc. 

Sports are watched differently than they were during the
era of the three-network universe. The bonds of loyalty to
a nationally televised sport can be broken more easily
because there is so much else to do and perhaps less
patience. If Sampras is not playing Andre Agassi, viewers
may flip to Sex and the City. 

There are different ways to view the decline in ratings for
virtually everything but the Super Bowl. Bulgrin said that
from 1996 to 2001, Nielsen Media Research figured that the
average rating for nationally televised sports fell 10
percent, a bigger drop than for any other segment of the TV
audience. On the other hand, for the year ended in 

t-and-f: 200m Speed of Distance Runners - Billy Mills

2003-09-10 Thread Chas. L. Shaffer
Wasn't there recently a thread in which we were wondering if any current U.S. distance
runners could run the 200 in 24.5 seconds or less?  Please forgive me if I am 
remembering
that time incorrectly.

Billy Mills recalls being timed for the 200 just prior to his gold medal performance
at the 1964 Olympics:

 In Tokyo four days before the Olympics started I was ending my training
session. It was dusk and there was hardly another soul anywhere around. I'd had 
continuing doubts about how good my kick was and I just decided on the spur of the
moment to run a 200 meters as fast as I possibly could. I walked over to the track
and spotted a guy with a stopwatch. Turned out he was a German coach who spoke a
little bit of English. I got across to him that I'd like to run a 200 and would 
he time me. He must have thought I was nuts. But he nodded and off I went. Maybe
not the smartest thing I've ever done, running that hard so close to the race, but
I just had to know what I had in my tank. Off I go and I was flying. I crossed the
finish line and made the mistake of asking, How fast? He shook his head, and said,
'Slow.' You see, he thought I was a sprinter. My heart sank then I asked, what time?
And he said, in a thick German accent, and I think I've got the time right or close,
'23-20.' Anyway, it was the fastest 200 meters of my life. And I knew right there
I had a shot. A real shot. It gave me a huge confidence boost. Who knows what would
have happened if I hadn't walked over to that German coach? Life is a mystery, that's
what I think.

 -from a 3-part interview with Billy Mills in the weekly newspaper Indian
Country Today by Frank Coffey, Aug. 6, 13, and 20, 2003.

http://www.indiancountry.com/?1060205474
http://www.indiancountry.com/?1061386694
http://www.indiancountry.com/?1061497648

But, methinks, how could the time have been 23.20?  I don't think there were any
digital watches in those days, so wouldn't the coach have said 23.2?

Charley Shaffer
Seattle





RE: t-and-f: 200m Speed of Distance Runners - Billy Mills

2003-09-10 Thread Steve Bennett

Add 0.5s for a watch probably started off a first movement and you get 23.70

regards
Steve Bennett
www.oztrack.com

 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chas. L. Shaffer
Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 7:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: t-and-f: 200m Speed of Distance Runners - Billy Mills


Wasn't there recently a thread in which we were wondering if any current
U.S. distance runners could run the 200 in 24.5 seconds or less?  Please
forgive me if I am remembering that time incorrectly.

Billy Mills recalls being timed for the 200 just prior to his gold medal
performance at the 1964 Olympics:

 In Tokyo four days before the Olympics started I was ending my
training session. It was dusk and there was hardly another soul anywhere
around. I'd had 
continuing doubts about how good my kick was and I just decided on the spur
of the moment to run a 200 meters as fast as I possibly could. I walked over
to the track and spotted a guy with a stopwatch. Turned out he was a German
coach who spoke a little bit of English. I got across to him that I'd like
to run a 200 and would 
he time me. He must have thought I was nuts. But he nodded and off I went.
Maybe not the smartest thing I've ever done, running that hard so close to
the race, but I just had to know what I had in my tank. Off I go and I was
flying. I crossed the finish line and made the mistake of asking, How fast?
He shook his head, and said, 'Slow.' You see, he thought I was a sprinter.
My heart sank then I asked, what time? And he said, in a thick German
accent, and I think I've got the time right or close, '23-20.' Anyway, it
was the fastest 200 meters of my life. And I knew right there I had a shot.
A real shot. It gave me a huge confidence boost. Who knows what would have
happened if I hadn't walked over to that German coach? Life is a mystery,
that's what I think.

 -from a 3-part interview with Billy Mills in the weekly newspaper
Indian Country Today by Frank Coffey, Aug. 6, 13, and 20, 2003.

http://www.indiancountry.com/?1060205474
http://www.indiancountry.com/?1061386694
http://www.indiancountry.com/?1061497648

But, methinks, how could the time have been 23.20?  I don't think there were
any digital watches in those days, so wouldn't the coach have said 23.2?

Charley Shaffer
Seattle