RE: t-and-f: Test

2007-02-10 Thread Michalis Nikitaridis
received

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Winfried Kramer
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 10:43 AM
To: t-and-f@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject: t-and-f: Test

Test
-- 
Winfried Kramer
Kohlrodweg 12
66539  Neunkirchen/GERMANY
ATFS
Editor of NATIONAL ATHLETICS RECORDS
Fax: (49) 6821 932101



Re: t-and-f: test

2005-03-31 Thread koala
I got this one. 


 On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:37:16 -0500, you wrote:

>I sent a message the other day and it still hasn't gone through. This was
>sent 3/31/05 - 7:30 p.m.
>Allen




Re: t-and-f: test....

2002-08-18 Thread Mike Prizy

Check with King George.

John Beattie wrote:

> Is the server down?
>
> *John Beattie*
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: t-and-f: test your reaction time! .12 can be done....

2001-03-20 Thread Ed & Dana Parrot

Mike Platt wrote:
> >  http://www.mwvyouthhockey.org/reactions.htm
> >
> I took this test, my reaction time with this. It proves to me that people
can
> react as fast as .12.  I consistently scored .22 to .24 without ANY
practice.
> I am a 40 year old distance runner. I am not exactly the posterboy for
world
> class reaction times or coordination. It is my belief that thier has to be
> people on this earth who can react in half the time I can.

Folks, as amusing as this reaction time test is, it so unreliable as to be
pointless in measuring things in a tenth of a second. Between clicking on
one web page button and another, the path that the command travels to get to
the silicon and back (numerous times) is circuitous to say the least.  Now
this might suggest that people's reaction times are actually faster, but
depending on how they wrote this, that might not be the case.  And I'd say
this test does not test reaction time at all because you are not measuring
the time between a stimulus occurring at an imprecise time and a measured
reaction - the stimulus is controlled by the subject (the first mouse click)
and this destroys the whole test.

If you are really interested, look up the studies and find out the nature of
the samples and methodology that drove the decision to set the .10 limit.

- Ed Parrot
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: t-and-f: test your reaction time! .12 can be done....

2001-03-20 Thread GHTFNedit

In a message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2001  6:54:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, Mpplatt writes:

<< I took this test, my reaction time with this. It proves to me that people can react 
as fast as .12.  I consistently scored .22 to .24 without ANY practice. I am a 40 year 
old distance runner. I am not exactly the posterboy for world class reaction times or 
coordination. It is my belief that thier has to be people on this earth who can react 
in half the time I can.The abilities of World Class athletes are awesome to me 
but, not surprising.  >>

Mike is assuming that practice will improve his time. Maybe it does, but I'm not 
convinced that it will. Any physios out there care to comment on whether or not you're 
basically stuck with the wiring you were born with? (I'm not talking about being able 
to improve your body's ability to perform a complex set of tasks more efficiently 
through repetition, that's a given. I'm talking about basic simple reaction.)

Mike also assumes that a 40-year-old distance runner isn't a posterboy. Why not? Not 
sure there's a correlation between ability to react quickly and any kind of athletic 
ability. Is there? 

I remember when 100th-second electric watches first came out and a dozen or so of us 
track nuts decided to see who could start and stop their watch the fastest. The clear 
winner was the guy who was the least athletic (indeed non-athletic) of the bunch.

gh



Re: t-and-f: test your reaction time! .12 can be done....

2001-03-20 Thread Mpplatt

In a message dated 3/20/01 2:15:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> i went searching, hoping for a site that would give some kind of research. 
> Did find this interesting thing (eh). Do this puppy a few times, then tell 
me 
> if you think a REACTION TIME (not anticipation) of less than 0.1 is 
possible.
>  
>  http://www.mwvyouthhockey.org/reactions.htm
>  
I took this test, my reaction time with this. It proves to me that people can 
react as fast as .12.  I consistently scored .22 to .24 without ANY practice. 
I am a 40 year old distance runner. I am not exactly the posterboy for world 
class reaction times or coordination. It is my belief that thier has to be 
people on this earth who can react in half the time I can.

The abilities of World Class athletes are awesome to me but, not surprising. 

Mike Platt