Re: t-and-f: Donohue: 4:47.61 at Princeton
In a message dated 5/12/01 9:44:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: She evidently skipped today's Camden County meet in her quest for a state HS record in the event. NJ must be enlightened - in CT they wouldn't accept a mark if it wasn't run in a state HS meet. Jim Gerweck Running Times
Re: t-and-f: Donohue: 4:47.61 at Princeton
Actually, it's not NJ that's enlightened, it's Ed. His records are considered official by everybody in the state (coaches, writers, athletes, state officials), so if he says something is a record and he lists it in the NJ Track Annual (published since 1966) as a record, it IS a record. NJ must be enlightened - in CT they wouldn't accept a mark if it wasn't run in a state HS meet. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Re: t-and-f: Donohue: 4:47.61 at Princeton
In a message dated 5/13/01 8:46:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: NJ must be enlightened - in CT they wouldn't accept a mark if it wasn't run in a state HS meet. I do not believe that this statement is true. I believe in Connecticut that they will accept a mark as a state record if the mark was set in a sanctioned High School meet with five or more schools competing. However, it has been a few years since I coached High School in CT... Dave Cohen
t-and-f: Donohue: 4:47.61 at Princeton
Netterrs: Glacning through results of the Golden Spikes races at Princeton today, I was surprised to see, buried in the women's mile field, Erin Donohie of Haddonfield at 3:47.41. She evidently skipped today's Camden County meet in her quest for a state HS record in the event. However, she fell short of Michelle Rowen's 1982 4:42.3 mark, but did get a PR, beating her 4:48,68 set while winning the Nationals in 1999. Ed Grant
