Right, but which Charlie do you believe? Charlie then or Charlie now?
What I'm saying is that IF (a very big if) Charlie has now seen the light
thanks to watching Marion and Tim compete clean, then it is not unreasonable
to conclude that the old Charlie was either untruthful or simply wrong, and
that there were at least some clean runners at the top all the time.
Kurt Bray
or, *to play devil's advocate* (or, if you believe that part of Francis's
writings) Ben was the same caliber as those around him, and when they all
doped, the result was the same, but they just ran faster.
From: Kurt Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Kurt Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 05:12:13 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: IAAF is cautious on Charlie Francis statement
against
doping
In other words,
maybe Ben really was a no more than a second-tier sprinter who needed to
use
dope in order to beat clean athletes who were better than him.
_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
