Re: t-and-f: Now if more people had balls like these, esp in MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, etc

2002-02-22 Thread John Sun

If I recall, Yegorova tested positive on her A sample,
but was reinstated because there were problems with
the B sample. 

Interestingly enough, if Yegorova was American, her
name never would have disclosed to the public, based
on current USADA procedures, and she would have been
allowed to compete at the World Championships
untainted by scandal. 

From what I've read, she wasn't double positive due to
technicality. Under USADA guidelines, only in the case
of a double positive is there need for a review board
recommendation, and if suspension is recommended then
the athlete is entitled to an abitration hearing. Only
after the hearing is the name made public if the
suspension is upheld. Yegorova had only an A positive,
yet her name was dragged through the mud at the World
Championships. Sounds like she has good grounds for a
law suit if she was American.

I don't condone cheating, and now that I think I
understand the USADA process, I believe it is the
correct course of action for the US. However, there
seems to be a double standard in the US, i.e. Yegorova
is Russian so she must be guilty even though it is
clear she was not afforded her due process under USADA
guidelines. 

If the Yegorova situation happened to an American
star, let's say  Regina Jacobs or Maurice Greene, then
this would all be a moot point because none of us
would know. Only the IAAF (because they did the
original testing), USATF, USADA and the athlete would
know that the A test was positive and rightfully so
because the B test was thrown out. Food for thought...

John Sun

--- Michael J. Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yegorova not 'family friendly' enough for French
 event
 
 Agence France-Presse
 
 LIEVEN, France (February 21, 2002 02:12 PM EST) -
 The controversial
 Russian distance runner Olga Yegorova has not been
 invited to run in
 Sunday's indoor athletics meeting because she failed
 to meet the
 organizers' family-friendly criteria.
 
 Yegorova was banned last year after testing positive
 for the banned
 endurance-boosting substance EPO, but was reinstated
 on a technicality
 and went on to win the world 5,000-meter outdoor
 title in Edmonton,
 Canada.
 
 But Gerard Fremaux, the organizer of the Lieven
 meeting - one of the
 leading indoor events - said Thursday he was not
 prepared to let
 athletes who had been involved in doping take part
 in his event.
 
 Yegorova was on a list of around 25 athletes
 submitted to me by her
 manager for inclusion in the meeting, said Fremaux.
 I chose around
 five athletes and Yegorova was not one of them.
 
 We want a meeting that will be educational and
 there will be a lot of
 children here, so I don't want athletes who have had
 doping problems.
 
 Yegorova was beaten into second place by Ethiopia's
 Berhane Adere in her
 first race of the year in Stuttgart earlier this
 month, as the Ethiopian
 set a new 3,000 indoor world record of 8 minutes,
 29.15 seconds.
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com



Re: t-and-f: Now if more people had balls like these, esp in MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, etc

2002-02-22 Thread koala

Yegorova had only an A positive,
yet her name was dragged through the mud at the World
Championships. Sounds like she has good grounds for a
law suit if she was American.

Why? The World Championships were in Canada.  Cases are
usually filed in the jurisdiction where an alleged offense
has occured.  I doubt Americans have any better standing
in Canadian courts than would a Russian.

I don't condone cheating, and now that I think I
understand the USADA process, I believe it is the
correct course of action for the US. However, there
seems to be a double standard in the US, i.e. Yegorova
is Russian so she must be guilty even though it is
clear she was not afforded her due process under USADA
guidelines. 

Where are you hearing this?
It was the Brits who were burning Yeg at the stake-
especially a certain Brit female who threatened to skip
the Edmonton final over the presence of Yeg.
And it is a European meet promoter this week who chose
not to 'offer her an invitation'.
I don't recall anything about Americans involved in
any aspect of the Yeg case or any follow-up implications.

I DO agree, by the way, that what's happening to her
is a good argument FOR the American policy of non-disclosure
to the public until the case is well advanced.
The European promoter is acting purely on personal bias and
politically correct spin.  Sets a horrible precedent.

That said, I have absolutely no idea whether Yeg is guilty
as can be, or innocent as a babe in the woods.  (where did
that saying come from anyway?)

By the way, given that the circumstances of her case [as
reported third- or fourth-hand by the news media] seem far
more suspicious than any alleged American case recently, I'm
sure the renowned Canadian IOC member will stop trashing
the Americans and move his focus to the Russians.  Uh-huh,
right.

RT



Re: t-and-f: Now if more people had balls like these, esp in MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, etc

2002-02-22 Thread Buck Jones

John Sun Wrote:
Yegorova had only an A positive

Do I recall this incorrectly?  I thought Yeg (nice nickname RT) failed the
urine test (A  B) but was re-instated partly because the test is new and
not yet completely vetted for use, and partly because a concurrent blood
test was not performed to confirm high hematocrit (as was required by IAAF).
In Edmonton, her crit was high, but she passed the urine test.

I find it a fascinating indicator of how American laws make us more free
than almost any other place, but at the same time we are constrained so
strictly by those same laws.  Under US law, Yeg is innocent, and as such
could probably not be banned from a meet as she was in France.  US citizens
are more protected by law on the one hand, but more restricted on the other.

Cheers,
Buck Jones




Re: t-and-f: Now if more people had balls like these, esp in MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, etc

2002-02-22 Thread John Sun


 Where are you hearing this?
 It was the Brits who were burning Yeg at the stake-
 especially a certain Brit female who threatened to
 skip
 the Edmonton final over the presence of Yeg.

Just look at the subject line to the original post.
Due to the media , I think most people (including
myself) believed she was a cheat even though she was
eventually cleared. However, after learning more about
the USADA process recently, I'm trying to look at her
situation in a different light.

 I don't recall anything about Americans involved in
 any aspect of the Yeg case or any follow-up
 implications.

My apologies. I didn't mean to imply any American
involvement in the Yeg case. I just wanted to make a
point that if she was American then she would have
gone through the USADA process, and her identity never
would have been released (I readily admit to not
knowing the full details of why she got off). 

More importantly, she would have went to Edmonton as
the hot favorite, probably would have had a NBC up
close and personal done on her, and won the gold with
no cloud over her head. And none of us who have
known about her positive test.

In this light, you can argue that Yegorova got royally
screwed by the IAAF because her name was dragged
through the mud, and she wasn't afforded the due
process that US athletes receive from USADA and our
laws.

John

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com



Re: t-and-f: Now if more people had balls like these, esp in MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, etc

2002-02-22 Thread GHTFNedit

In a message dated Fri, 22 Feb 2002  8:40:46 AM Eastern Standard Time, Buck Jones 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 John Sun Wrote:
 Yegorova had only an A positive
 
 Do I recall this incorrectly?  I thought Yeg (nice nickname RT) failed the
 urine test (A  B) but was re-instated partly because the test is new and
 not yet completely vetted for use

She was reinstated originally because the French, in their haste, used a blood test 
which the IAAF didn't recognize as grounds. But it is true that the B sample of urine 
didn't confirm the A (although there were dark mumblings about manipulated samples). 
That crucial fact got lost in all the media hoo-ha.

Perhaps she was just lucky, but she passed all required tests, and as such, should 
be free to run whenever and wherever.  Just as OJ is free to walk the streets. If you 
believe in your justice system, then you've got to live with its verdicts, flawed as 
they may seem.

gh



Re: t-and-f: Now if more people had balls like these, esp in MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, etc

2002-02-22 Thread Dan Kaplan

Slightly off topic (which may well be a good thing), but anyone else find
the Korean speed skating delegation's argument amusing?  You know, the one
about their skater getting disqualified for a rules infraction and how the
winner should be decided on the ice.  If I'm not mistaken, it was in Korea
that Carl Lewis won Olympic gold by finishing 2nd...  Rules are rules,
whether or not we agree with them.

Dan

=
http://AccountBiller.com - MyCalendar, D-Man, ReSearch, etc.
http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Fantasy TF

  @o   Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |\/ ^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
_/ \ \/\   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (lifetime forwarding address)
   /   /   (503)370-9969 phone/fax

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com



Re: t-and-f: Now if more people had balls like these, esp in MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, etc

2002-02-22 Thread John Sun


--- Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Slightly off topic (which may well be a good thing),
 but anyone else find
 the Korean speed skating delegation's argument
 amusing?  You know, the one
 about their skater getting disqualified for a rules
 infraction and how the
 winner should be decided on the ice.  If I'm not
 mistaken, it was in Korea
 that Carl Lewis won Olympic gold by finishing 2nd...
  Rules are rules,
 whether or not we agree with them.
 
It's also ironic that in those same Seoul Oympics an
American boxer (whose name escapes me but recently was
mentioned again during the pairs figure skating
fiasco) was denied a gold medal even though it was
said he clearly defeated the South Korean boxer in the
final. Maybe it was karmic retribution that the speed
skater was DQed.

John

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com



Re: t-and-f: Now if more people had balls like these, esp in MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, etc

2002-02-22 Thread Mpplatt

In a message dated Fri, 22 Feb 2002  4:39:38 PM Eastern Standard Time, John Sun 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 --- Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Slightly off topic (which may well be a good thing),
  but anyone else find
  the Korean speed skating delegation's argument
  amusing?  You know, the one
  about their skater getting disqualified for a rules
  infraction and how the
  winner should be decided on the ice.  If I'm not
  mistaken, it was in Korea
  that Carl Lewis won Olympic gold by finishing 2nd...
   Rules are rules,
  whether or not we agree with them.
  
 It's also ironic that in those same Seoul Oympics an
 American boxer (whose name escapes me but recently was
 mentioned again during the pairs figure skating
 fiasco) was denied a gold medal even though it was
 said he clearly defeated the South Korean boxer in the
 final. Maybe it was karmic retribution that the speed
 skater was DQed.
 
 John
 
It was Roy Jones Jr.  



Re: t-and-f: Now if more people had balls like these, esp in MLB, NFL, NHL,NBA, etc

2002-02-22 Thread Kurt Bray


It's also ironic that in those same Seoul Oympics an
American boxer (whose name escapes me but recently was
mentioned again during the pairs figure skating
fiasco) was denied a gold medal even though it was
said he clearly defeated the South Korean boxer in the
final. Maybe it was karmic retribution that the speed
skater was DQed.

His name was Roy Jones.  I attend the games in Seoul in '88 and got to 
witness that bout in person - and a bigger hometown robbery I never did see. 
  Roy beat his opponent like a drum for the three full rounds only to 
somehow be declared the loser.  It wasn't even close. If I'd been the Korean 
boxer I'd have been ashamed to accept the medal.

The first hint I got that the fix was in was shortly after the third round 
when I noticed Korean journalists scurrying around and looking over the 
shoulders of the judges as they marked their score cards and then ran away 
literally jumping for joy.

The memory of that is one reason why I find the current Korean officials 
indignation over Olympic judging rather amusing.

Kurt Bray


_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com




t-and-f: Now if more people had balls like these, esp in MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, etc

2002-02-21 Thread Michael J. Roth

Yegorova not 'family friendly' enough for French event

Agence France-Presse

LIEVEN, France (February 21, 2002 02:12 PM EST) - The controversial
Russian distance runner Olga Yegorova has not been invited to run in
Sunday's indoor athletics meeting because she failed to meet the
organizers' family-friendly criteria.

Yegorova was banned last year after testing positive for the banned
endurance-boosting substance EPO, but was reinstated on a technicality
and went on to win the world 5,000-meter outdoor title in Edmonton,
Canada.

But Gerard Fremaux, the organizer of the Lieven meeting - one of the
leading indoor events - said Thursday he was not prepared to let
athletes who had been involved in doping take part in his event.

Yegorova was on a list of around 25 athletes submitted to me by her
manager for inclusion in the meeting, said Fremaux. I chose around
five athletes and Yegorova was not one of them.

We want a meeting that will be educational and there will be a lot of
children here, so I don't want athletes who have had doping problems.

Yegorova was beaten into second place by Ethiopia's Berhane Adere in her
first race of the year in Stuttgart earlier this month, as the Ethiopian
set a new 3,000 indoor world record of 8 minutes, 29.15 seconds.