t-and-f: Re: the walking situation is intolerable!

2002-06-21 Thread Ed Sears

Although many us of fail to appreciate the finer points walking, it  has a 
long and honored tradition in T&F.  Walking events were common at both 
British and American track meets throughout the 19th century.  Walking was 
as controversial in those days as it is today.  Charles Westhall, a fine 
athlete who ran 150 yards in 15.0 in 1851 and a year later became  the 
first runner to break 4:30 for the mile on a track was also a champion 
walker covering 7 miles in 52min 43sec .  Westhall wrote a little book 
"Hints Upon Training" in about 1860.  Here's what he had to say about 
judging walking matches and his enthusiasm for the sport:

"It [walking] is the most useful and at the same time most abused branch of 
the athletic sports of Old England; not so much from the fault of the 
pedestrians as from the inability or want of courage of the judge or 
referee to stop the man - who in his eagerness for fame or determination to 
gain money anyhow, may trespass upon fair walking, and run. Walking is a 
succession of steps, not leaps, and with one foot always on the ground. The 
term "fair toe and heel' was meant to infer that as the foot of the back 
leg left the ground, and before the toes had been lifted, that the heel of 
the foremost foot should be on the ground. Even this apparently simple rule 
is broken almost daily, in consequence of the pedestrian performing with a 
bent and loose knee, in which case the swing of his whole frame when going 
at any pace will invariably bring both feet off the ground at the same 
time; and although he is going heel and toe, He is not taking the required 
succession of steps, but is infringing the great and principal one, of one 
foot being continually on the ground. The same fault will be brought on by 
the pedestrian leaning forward with his body, and thereby leaning his 
weight on the front foot, which, when any great pace is intended, or the 
performer begins to be fatigued, first merges into a very short stride and 
then into a most undignified trot.. There may be a few professional 
pedestrians - happily, only a few - who care not how they may come in first 
in a match, and get the money; but they are now fast dying out, not from 
age, but from being stopped at their little game by an honest and resolute 
referee, and by the loud expressions of public opinion, which invariably 
has taken the part of the fair walker. There is no finer sight among the 
long catalogue of British sports, more exhilarating and amusing to the true 
sportsman, than to see a walking match carried out to the strict letter of 
the meaning, each moving with the grandest action of which the human frame 
is capable, at a pace which the feeble frame and mind is totally unable to 
comprehend, and must be witnessed to be believed."

Ed Sears



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/2002



t-and-f: Re: the walking situation is intolerable!

2002-06-20 Thread Richard McCann

At 12:33 PM 6/20/2002 -0700, t-and-f-digest wrote..
>How often
>do you need to be told that walkers do not lift on purpose and that 
>judging, to
>maintain continuity with the past, is judged as seen by the human eye?  It is
>true that some athletes can be seen to be off the ground in still photos or
>videos viewed frame by frame in events where they are not disqualified.

Why do we have an event in T&F where we KNOW that the athletes cannot 
comply with the rules?  We're not figure skating or gymnastics where we can 
leave such large discretion to the judges.  This situation is intolerable 
for the sport to my way of thinking.   I really don't care about whether 
the human eye is can detect it or not.  We went to autotiming and 
plasticine to limit the influence of human judging on events.  If we can't 
do the same with the walks then they shouldn't be in the sport.   This is 
my last word on the subject.


Richard McCann