On 29/3/21 3:58 pm, scsijon wrote:
On 29/3/21 12:39 pm, scsijon wrote:
On 29/3/21 6:30 am, scsijon wrote:
Sorry for the bad news, but neither of the
http://dl.t2-project.org/binary/2021 X86-64 versions will build a
current T2, both fail at 1-glibc so something's gone wrong somewhere
with your changes.
And my own version, that previously built (last year), but without
ninja, is now failing at 1-ninja with an error as >
./ninja: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by
./ninja)
even though libc.so.6 seems to be in the correct build directory. I
even linked it to the /usr/lib and the two lib64's in case it was
being looked for elsewhere. I will look into it but wonder if it's
looking outside the T2 build system as my local is version 2.31 as
we have had this type of problem before.
regards
scsijon
----------------------------------------------------------- If you
wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
li...@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
Having a hunt on the web, it seems there are a lot of problems with
a number of packages and glibc version 2.33 installed. Basic
sugestion from most is to step back down to 2.32, and that seems to
fix it, so i'm going to do that and start again. I'll report the
result in a day or so when back on.
Just a quick note that the T2 has now past 1-ninja using glibc 2.32
instead of 2.33, also there are a few notes in the develoment LFS
(8.5) that may be of assistance, something about needing to set
slibdir to /lib not /lib64 for a number of packages (at least ninja,
yasm, nasm, rust and something else (forgotten the name) require it).
And a note that other than what i've already commented about in
messages, it seems the only other problem is libusb (an easy one, when
you read it) and 20-minimal has been built.
And now on to 40-minimal-xorg
regards
scsijon
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
li...@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
