Re: [Tagging] Beaches

2010-04-09 Thread Andre Engels
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:03 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 9 April 2010 10:34, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
 For everyone who has never seen the sea 

 Seeing the sea isn't the problem, the sea is only a few blocks from here.

 Commonly a sandy beach consists of a dry part with loose sand above the high
 tide line and a wet part with compact sand between the low and high tide
 lines. What the wiki is trying to say, is that you should map the dry part.

 That isn't how I interpreted what the wiki says.

 Although that brings up another issue about how coastlines are legally
 defined as being at the mean low tide mark:

This is for the determination of territorial waters and economic
zones; on maps areas between low and high tide are usually not
considered land, and as far as I know they are also counted as water
area, not land area for determination of the area of countries and
other entities.

As an example, in the north of the Netherlands and the northeast of
Germany there are some outlaying islands (the Wadden Islands), and the
area between consists of flats of land falling dry at low tide with
deeper 'flow lines' in between. On maps both of these are shown as
sea.




-- 
André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Beaches

2010-04-09 Thread Cartinus
On Friday 09 April 2010 09:03:03 John Smith wrote:
 Although that brings up another issue about how coastlines are legally
 defined as being at the mean low tide mark

Actually this is completely irrelevant.

In OSM the coastline is not defined that way.

-- 
m.v.g.,
Cartinus

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Beaches

2010-04-09 Thread Steve Doerr
Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote in 
message news:201004090234.51222.carti...@xs4all.nl...

 For everyone who has never seen the sea 

 Commonly a sandy beach consists of a dry part with loose sand above the 
 high
 tide line and a wet part with compact sand between the low and high tide
 lines. What the wiki is trying to say, is that you should map the dry 
 part.

Which doesn't seem like a very good idea. Surely the whole beach should be 
mapped.

-- 
Steve 



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Beaches

2010-04-09 Thread Liz
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, John Smith wrote:
 From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beach
 
  Beach areas should always meet with a natural=coastline way. Do not use
  this tag for patches of sand/gravel which are not by a coastline. Note
  that the natural=coastline should ideally be positioned at the average
  high tide line, which may mean the beach is quite small or not mapped at
  all in fact.
 
 By this logic wouldn't the beach cover from the average high tide line
 to the average low tide line?
 
 Which brings up the next issue, how to determine the average high and
 low tide lines from aerial imagery...
 

Interesting that the wiki writer said that all beaches were on a coastline.
Rivers here have beaches, and they have names like Town Beach (Tocumwal) 
Wagga Beach (Wagga Wagga).


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging