Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Key:designation)

2011-03-02 Thread Markus Lindholm
On 1 March 2011 21:47, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote:
 You'all are welcome to:

 1) Make another proposal
 2) Vote yes or no to the proposal as it stands

 It's not appropriate to fine-tune the proposal during the voting stage
 - you either approve or oppose it as it stands.

 If there's an appropriate majority after 2 weeks, I'll move it to
 approved. Otherwise we'll just carry on waiting for a better idea
 (it might be a long wait).

My proposal is simply to use an other key, and once a better name for
the key is agreed upon to change the existing tags to use the new key

/Markus

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Key:designation)

2011-03-02 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/3/2 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
 My proposal is simply to use an other key, and once a better name for
 the key is agreed upon to change the existing tags to use the new key


it might also help to use namespaces for the values, like
uk:public_bridleway
instead of public_bridleway

cheers,
Martin

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Key:designation)

2011-03-02 Thread Richard Fairhurst
M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 it might also help to use namespaces for the values, like
 uk:public_bridleway
 instead of public_bridleway

So I presume you're planning to do that for other tags whose meaning varies
by country, like highway=uk:trunk, highway=de:motorway...

OSM. For People Who Don't Quite Understand The Whole Spatial Thing In
Spatial Databases.

Richard


--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-Voting-Key-designation-tp6077969p6081243.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Key:designation)

2011-03-02 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/3/2 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
 M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 it might also help to use namespaces for the values, like
 uk:public_bridleway
 instead of public_bridleway

 So I presume you're planning to do that for other tags whose meaning varies
 by country, like highway=uk:trunk, highway=de:motorway...

 OSM. For People Who Don't Quite Understand The Whole Spatial Thing In
 Spatial Databases.


There is no doubt that an application can (given correct boundaries
and massive preprocessing) determine in which country a road lies. My
consideration was biased towards novice mappers and a consistent
tagging scheme. The OSM kosmos of tags is already not easy to
understand. If there was a preset like uk in front of this tag, e.g.
German or Italian mappers would know that they don't have to care for
these.

cheers,
Martin

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Key:designation)

2011-03-02 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Tordanik wrote:
 I'm still not quite sure whether I understand what designation=* 
 is supposed to do.

It's to record the legal status, or designation, of a given object - whether
that object be a footpath, a waterway, or whatever.

Having now looked at the wiki voting page I'm afraid the description given
there is spectacularly bad. :( I'll rewrite it tomorrow morning (UK time).

cheers
Richard



--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-Voting-Key-designation-tp6077969p6082436.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Key:designation)

2011-03-02 Thread Richard Mann
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
 Tordanik wrote:
 I'm still not quite sure whether I understand what designation=*
 is supposed to do.

 It's to record the legal status, or designation, of a given object - whether
 that object be a footpath, a waterway, or whatever.

 Having now looked at the wiki voting page I'm afraid the description given
 there is spectacularly bad. :( I'll rewrite it tomorrow morning (UK time).

During the RFC, the only comments concerned it's use for recording
path types in England and Wales. No great desire was expressed for
it's use for other purposes, so I left it as largely for the EW
purpose, but with the proviso that others could start using it for
other purposes if it met a locally-agreed need (or I guess if you just
feel like it).

Nop added the German values, though they haven't been taken up by the
German community (which makes his negative vote a bit cheeky, really,
but such is life). My preliminary conclusion is that the suggested
German values will simply be dropped, post-vote.

I reckon the voting is running at about 24000  a handful for, and a
handful against. Comments alongside the votes are more useful than the
votes, really.

The wiki/RFC/voting process is good for flushing out issues: it's
better than just sitting in ignorance of what others think.

Richard

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Key:designation)

2011-03-02 Thread Alex Mauer

On 03/02/2011 05:01 PM, Richard Mann wrote:


I reckon the voting is running at about 24000  a handful for, and a
handful against.


Oh, come on.  If you’re going to count every element tagged with 
designation=* as a “vote for” you really ought to count every element 
*not* tagged with designation=* as a vote against.  Both cases are 
obviously silly.


At best you could count the number of users who have applied this tag 
using the values described on the page, which is guaranteed to be less 
than 24000.



Comments alongside the votes are more useful than the
votes, really.


I wonder if we might do well to move from a voting system to a 
“veto-based” system like the one which seems to do well for Musicbrainz. 
[1] Since it requires a (subjective) good reason for a veto, it might be 
better than the simple yes/no.  On the negative, it allows anyone to 
hold up forever any idea that they don’t like.


—Alex Mauer “hawke”

1. http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Request_For_Veto#Process_for_Idea_Champions


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging