[Tagging] Proposed feature - Sidewalks as separate ways - Voting
Hello people, since there have been no discussion in the last days, I believe the ideas are clear enough about the proposal. If you have questions, please post them to the proposal's talk page, I'll reply promptly (or will try to :)). In any case, the voting is open: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sidewalk_as_separate_way As per the wiki guidelines, the voting period is 14 days. Starting today, ending Apr, 26. Have a nice day, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - vegetarian (and other diets)
Hello, I've moved this proposal to the vote, it has been open for discussion for a few months and has now been used in the wild for a similar period of time to see how well it works in practice. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Vegetarian http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/VegetarianRegards, Tom -- http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] access forbidden for tourist busses
Recently I found this sign which I interpret as access forbidden to touristic busses: http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/6610385 It is at a driveway to the local cemetery, near a very popular monument (unesco world heritage). Do we have to invent another access tag, or is there already something in use? My first idea was tourist_bus=no cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] access forbidden for tourist busses
On 12 April 2011 19:22, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Recently I found this sign which I interpret as access forbidden to touristic busses: http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/6610385 It is at a driveway to the local cemetery, near a very popular monument (unesco world heritage). Do we have to invent another access tag, or is there already something in use? My first idea was tourist_bus=no Why not use access:*=* ? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] access forbidden for tourist busses
2011/4/12 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: My first idea was tourist_bus=no Why not use access:*=* ? Usually we tag foot=no instead of access:foot=no, and I don't see why I should change this standard here. My question was: which key is used for tourist busses. I couldn't find them on the access-page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] access forbidden for tourist busses
On 12 April 2011 20:01, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/12 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: My first idea was tourist_bus=no Why not use access:*=* ? Usually we tag foot=no instead of access:foot=no, and I don't see why I should change this standard here. There is a lot of access:*=* for vehicles, so you would be going against things. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] access forbidden for tourist busses
2011/4/12 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: Why not use access:*=* ? Usually we tag foot=no instead of access:foot=no, and I don't see why I should change this standard here. There is a lot of access:*=* for vehicles, so you would be going against things. Where? I can't find them: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de:8001/search?q=access#keys are you talking about 188 shoulder:access:bicycle or about 38 access:bus and 33 access:hgv ? compare this to 45187 hgv... cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] etymology of street names
On 09/04/2011 15:30, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2011/4/8 Simone Saviolosimone.savi...@gmail.com: Good idea, but not with etymology as the name. This is not the etymology; that would be the philological origins of the word. +1 Here we are talking about a description of the person the place is named after, and especially the reason why he deserved the honour. +1 One possibility would be to use a tag like name:wikipedia=language:article name (presetting name to a wikipedia-tag-like-construction). Most important persons will have their own wikipedia article. -1. It seems that the intention here is to record the words on the sign. Maybe the word eponymy would be appropriate? -- Steve ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] access forbidden for tourist busses
2011/4/12 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: On 12 April 2011 20:36, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Where? I can't find them: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dbdouble Wikipage modified 13 times, in the database 0 (zero) occurrences ;-) http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de:8001/keys/access%3Abdouble I suggest you change this tagging proposal, so it is consistent with the rest of the access restrictions. Given no objects tagged with this tag a modification should be straight forward. cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] access forbidden for tourist busses
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 12:01 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2011/4/12 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: My first idea was tourist_bus=no Why not use access:*=* ? Usually we tag foot=no instead of access:foot=no, and I don't see why I should change this standard here. To be fair, using that schema, we also tag ski, horse, vehicle, bicycle, motorcycle, moped, motorcar, goods, hgv, psv, bus, taxi snowmobile, emergency, hazmat, etc. Surely it makes sense to have a standard 'access' class key, rather than having 30 different keys? Just because one method of tagging has more use than another, it doesnt necessarily mean that its correct or the best way to do it, especially in the situation of having dozens of access tags (which arent even classed under access) with different meanings depending on their context. For example, access:emergency is quite different to emergency=*, the former is obviously an access restriction/allowance, the latter is usually used to tag individual emergency nodes such as ambulance/SES stations or fire hoses. David ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] access forbidden for tourist busses
On 4/12/11 7:59 PM, David Murn wrote: On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 12:01 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2011/4/12 John Smithdeltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: My first idea was tourist_bus=no Why not use access:*=* ? Usually we tag foot=no instead of access:foot=no, and I don't see why I should change this standard here. To be fair, using that schema, we also tag ski, horse, vehicle, bicycle, motorcycle, moped, motorcar, goods, hgv, psv, bus, taxi snowmobile, emergency, hazmat, etc. Surely it makes sense to have a standard 'access' class key, rather than having 30 different keys? there are tradeoffs. my only complaint about the goods=no model is that there is no capacity to set up different restrictions (days_on/days_off, hours_on/hours_off) but that could be easily fixed by something like goods:hours_on= goods:hours_off= richard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
