Re: [Tagging] Powerlines underground

2013-01-17 Thread François Lacombe
Hi folks,

Here is a similar type of infrastructure : pipelines.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline

It can be underground, overground and underwater.

Like electric lines, building such things require different techniques
because of location.
Alaska pipeline, mainly overground needs to be heated to avoid oil from
freezing right in the pipe.
Caucasian ones need to be underground.
etc...

Different implementations but one only tag. Think about it.

2013/1/17 François Lacombe francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu

 I don't see any thing against using level=* to solve some rendering issues.

 Feature-independance is maybe the key for more simplicity and versatility.
 As location=underground is one other example.
 power=cable isn't feature independent at all, are we?

 2013/1/16 A.Pirard.Papou a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com

 I'm somewhat of a tourist in this thread (if you didn't notice) but I
 can't help wondering why these lines aka cables are not tagged with at
 least layer=±3 (1).
 Now, if we do not want the non-specialized renderer to be updated with
 each new feature, the best is a tag telling whether a underground hidden
 object has to be rendered with a dotted line. This is not tagging for the
 renderer (2), it is making an OSMap.

 This is the same feature-independence reasoning as saying that bridges
 are black objects a little wider than the road, just that, and tagged at
 level road-1, thus supporting the road without interrupting nor hiding it
 (as done at legacy level +1) and extending two black stripes to each side.
 While bridge=yes was OK, I have had rendering problems with bridge=culvert
 and I'm wondering why the renderer is messing in the hidden underskirt of a
 bridge :-)

 Cheers,

   André.
 (1) which should have been called level in my mind.
 BTW, wiki/Layer had better say that the ground at Earth surface is layer
 0.
 (2) which is working around its mistakes


 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




 --
 *François Lacombe*

 francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu
 http://www.infos-reseaux.com




-- 
*François Lacombe*

francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu
http://www.infos-reseaux.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] business closed for renovation - tagging best practice

2013-01-17 Thread Janko Mihelić
I think we should invent a tag for temporary out of work things. If you
download an offline map and go abroad, the application could estimate that
a few months have passed, and that a caffe could be open now, or that a
road could be open. When you put a highway=construction on the road, it
is closed for good if you don't have internet.

I reccomend something like closed=yes and if you have an idea about the
time when it could open, closed:until=-MM-DD. You could add a reason
for closing, closed:reason=renovation or closed:reason=construction.

This way we could even put real-time data like a shop closed for one day.

When a closed:until comes to an end, a bot could delete them
automatically.

Janko Mihelić
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] business closed for renovation - tagging best practice

2013-01-17 Thread Richard Welty

On 1/17/13 6:06 AM, Janko Mihelić wrote:

I reccomend something like closed=yes and if you have an idea about the
time when it could open, closed:until=-MM-DD. You could add a reason
for closing, closed:reason=renovation or closed:reason=construction.

i haven't been following this thread up until now, but some quick 
suggestions:


1) specify use of opening hours date/time syntax

2) look at access conditionals

3) support the expansion of opening hours syntax to include years that i 
just

suggested on another thread on this list. my rationale for this is the need
to be able to indicate dates/times of planned road closures for routing
purposes, which is almost the same requirement. we might as well try to
conform the tagging styles.

richard




___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Powerlines underground

2013-01-17 Thread Janko Mihelić
2013/1/17 François Lacombe francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu


 It can be underground, overground and underwater.


I would prefer seafloor instead of underwater. If it is drawn over water,
and you put underground that means it's dug into the sea floor.
Underwater can be anything from levitating at 1m below surface to 3km under
sea floor.

Janko Mihelić
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] business closed for renovation - tagging best practice

2013-01-17 Thread Steve Doerr
Would this fit the bill: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary ?


Steve

On 15/01/2013 00:17, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:

There is a fast food franchise site which is closed for renovation in my 
vicinity.  Two questions:
* Would you support or recommend tagging a transient state like 'closed for 
renovation'?
* If one were to indicate temporary closure, how would one do this?  In the 
case of renovation, would one use a construction-related tag?

Thanks for your input ... or referral to conversations/info which you'd 
consider definitive. --ceyockey

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Powerlines underground

2013-01-17 Thread François Lacombe
Yes you're right.

But I location values list sould be completed to match the proper one the
mapper think, obviously.

For Nord Stream, it would be location=underwater
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nord_Stream

For IFA2000, the power connection between France and GB, it would be
location=underground.
http://www.rte-france.com/uploads/media/pdf_zip/presse/dp-2006/dp_ifa_30_11_2006.pdf

location=* seems better and more precise to describe several situations
than power=cable.


2013/1/17 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com

 2013/1/17 François Lacombe francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu


 It can be underground, overground and underwater.


 I would prefer seafloor instead of underwater. If it is drawn over
 water, and you put underground that means it's dug into the sea floor.
 Underwater can be anything from levitating at 1m below surface to 3km under
 sea floor.

 Janko Mihelić

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




-- 
*François Lacombe*

francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu
http://www.infos-reseaux.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] business closed for renovation - tagging best practice

2013-01-17 Thread Greg Troxel

closed_until is overengineered* and does not match my local reality.
When a restaurant closes, it often posts closed for renovations.
Sometimes they open again, sometimes they don't.

So I think if it's a 2-week advertised window, ignore it or perhaps use
the tag.  But if there's no firm, less-than-30-days reopen time posted,
just remove it, and check back.

* meaning there are unmapped POIs, so this is something I am disinclined
  to spend time on


pgp6CXoRTUeQs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] business closed for renovation - tagging best practice

2013-01-17 Thread Janko Mihelić
2013/1/17 Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com

 Would this fit the bill:
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary ?


Yes, temporary:access=no is the same as my closed=yes tag. And the
ability to put more tags behind temporary: is quite handy.

Closed restaurants could be tagged as temporary:opening_hours=off.

Janko
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] business closed for renovation - tagging best practice

2013-01-17 Thread John F. Eldredge
Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think we should invent a tag for temporary out of work things. If
 you
 download an offline map and go abroad, the application could estimate
 that
 a few months have passed, and that a caffe could be open now, or that
 a
 road could be open. When you put a highway=construction on the road,
 it
 is closed for good if you don't have internet.
 
 I reccomend something like closed=yes and if you have an idea about
 the
 time when it could open, closed:until=-MM-DD. You could add a
 reason
 for closing, closed:reason=renovation or
 closed:reason=construction.
 
 This way we could even put real-time data like a shop closed for one
 day.
 
 When a closed:until comes to an end, a bot could delete them
 automatically.
 
 Janko Mihelić
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Sometimes a business ends up being closed for renovations or repairs for much 
longer than expected.  One McDonalds restaurant here in Nashville, TN, USA 
closed temporarily over a year ago due to a fire.  It is still closed, and 
still not repaired, due to a dispute between the corporation and the city (the 
zoning board wants all of the parking to be behind the restaurant, and 
McDonalds wants the parking to be on three sides of the restaurant, as it was 
with the old building).

-- 
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to 
think at all. -- Hypatia of Alexandria
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] business closed for renovation - tagging best practice

2013-01-17 Thread Janko Mihelić
2013/1/17 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com

 Sometimes a business ends up being closed for renovations or repairs for
 much longer than expected. One McDonalds restaurant here in Nashville, TN,
 USA closed temporarily over a year ago due to a fire. It is still closed,
 and still not repaired, due to a dispute between the corporation and the
 city (the zoning board wants all of the parking to be behind the
 restaurant, and McDonalds wants the parking to be on three sides of the
 restaurant, as it was with the old building).


Well then you decide what its status is. Is it an abandoned building
(building=yes), or is it a temporarily closed McDonalds (building=yes,
amenity=restaurant, temporary:opening_hours=off).

If someone says Meet me at the abandoned McDonalds, you could find that
with the temporary tag :) That's more information than just building=yes.

Janko
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging