Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=scramble

[Adam Franco]

For anyone who isn't follow all 3 threads, this topic is being discussed in:

* OSM Community: RFC: Highway=Mountaineering

* OSM Community: RfC: Highway=Scramble

* [Tagging]: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=scramble


While the thrust of each discussion is similar, there are a few interesting
ideas that have popped up in one versus another and slightly different key
suggestions have been discussed (`highway=mountaineering`,
`highway=scramble`, `highway=demanding_path`, etc).
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=scramble

[Georg]

Hi Yves,


> "Please bear in mind that quite a lot of them can be re-tagged
> automatically"



Can you give a single example of similar automatic re-tagging in the past ?


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Automated_edits_log lists
plenty, e.g.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/transform would be
similar to our purpose as it moved from one tag to another tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits_log and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue do list further
edits on large amount of data elements without individual consideration.

Please note the "can be" as well as the limitation to those paths that
can be transformed without any doubt and without creating nonsense 
It's just a possibility we shall be aware of in case the change to
highway=demanding_path was only rejected by some because of too much
work but else wise welcomed.

Regards,
Georg

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging