[Tagging] Refreshed proposal - Emergency=disaster_response

2023-07-12 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
Advising on behalf of the originator that
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Emergency%3Ddisaster_response
has been refreshed with new content.

So far, the person who redid it is only on the talk page, but further
conversation is also on the Forum at
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/refreshed-proposal-emergency-disaster-response/101036

Thanks

Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 166, Issue 10

2023-07-12 Thread St Niklaas
Hi Camelia, I once tried to mark inundations (flooded areas) for defensive 
reasons of methodes, since the borders are not very present or alike I stopd 
the project you wont be able to point the borders accurate.
So stick to the markings of roads and pois. dont trie to map area's as "flood 
dangerous". Or just an node on a potential flood prone with intermittemd or 
seasonal.

Greetz

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] disaster help point

2023-07-12 Thread michael spreng (datendelphin)

Hi

I propose some improvements to the tagging of
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddisaster_help_point

name

The name should not be descriptive. See {{Tag|name}}: "tag is supposed 
to contain solely name, not to describe the type or location of the 
object [...]" and "Do not use name=* if: The feature is known by a 
generic term or description [...]". Therefore I propose to drop the 
recommendation of the name tag in preference of the {{Tag|description}}. 
Proposal:
* {{Tag|description}} – "Name" of the point. Usually the name is a 
description of the location of the Point like "School Gym East Tashbol". 
If it really has a unique, non descriptive name, of course name could be 
used


covering

Maybe namespace it? Use {{Tag|disaster_help_point:covering}}? I could 
imagine that covering could be used for mapping a roof like feature. It 
is an ambiguous tag in that regard.


Address

The point will use an already existing address, but might be outdoors 
and even closer to another address (of a minor building for example). 
Therefore I would propose to recommend {{Tag|contact:*}} to make clear 
that this point is not the authoritative point for the address. Even if 
that scheme is still contentious. I simply don't know a better solution. 
The plain address is a not an option in my opinion due to the 
duplication. But I would still like to map the address, because it 
enables to find the point with a bit of local knowledge even when no GPS 
is available.


This is the same text as on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:emergency%3Ddisaster_help_point

Looking forward to further opinions

Michael

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging