[Tagging] Proposal - Key:access=restricted

[henkevdb]

Possibility to 'introduce' a Key:access=restricted 
 ... with 
description ; /*traffic only open for mentioned*=yes*/ .


Could be a simple 'replacement' for several others, like i.e. ;

access=restricted + agricultural=yes (because ;"Only for agricultural 
traffic")


and access=restricted + forestry=yes (because; "Only for forestry 
traffic.")


and access=restricted + delivery=yes (because; "Only when delivering to 
the element")


and so on ...

Because there is some 'confusing' for several 'cases' -> 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65458


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] [Proposal] Boundary=marker

[henkevdb]

"The tag historic =* 
indicates historic significance. It has no implications for the current 
condition or use of the structure."


http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] [Proposal] Boundary=marker

[henkevdb]

Proposal to change 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dboundary_stone into 
Boundary=marker and if it is historic, simply add historic=yes and/or 
add marker as value on this wikipage -> 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:boundary


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:historic%3Dboundary_stone

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aboundary%3Dmarker

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59721




___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Is linear man_made=pier supposed to be assumed as implying highway=footway, unless tagged otherwise?

[henkevdb]

The definition of 'Pier' on wikipedia is in my opinion not exactly 
correct. A pier is (usually) 'a long stretched construction on the 
ground or in a body of water', sometimes floating on water, sometimes on 
pillars,sometimes as a building on an airport,sometimes made of rocks as 
dam. But can also be a name of a person or a column designed to support 
concentrated load , etc . -> 
https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/pier


The Category:Piers in wikipedia should be more increased/detailed in my 
opinion -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Piers



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Rivers classification

[henkevdb]

I have a topic started at Belgium forum about tagging waterways, and 
found a link about 'Flanders classification-system'  -> 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=659424#p659424


Also, me thinks ; 'keep it simple' ... meaning ; all things, and also 
waterways can have a wikidata-code-number -> 
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page


which links to wikipedia (and other links), and there, on wikipedia can 
one find/define then a broad description of that waterway(or other 
'thing') .


Also, we, on OSM , have often to choose between ;

'very small' waterway = *ditch* (or some tag it as 'drain' ) *width < 1 
meter *


'small waterway' = *stream  width 1 - 3 meter*

'big(ger) waterway = *river  width > 3 meter*

that's my thinking about ->

the commonly accepted rule for OpenStreetMap is that a stream can be 
jumped across by an active, able-bodied person 






___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging