Re: [Tagging] Bad topology way level 2

2018-01-15 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:17:35 +0100
"OSMDoudou" <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote:

> Osmose reports an error with reason "Bad topology way level 2" [1] at
> this place [2] and I don't know how to resolve it.

You may want also report to Osmose developers that it reports errors
with unclear names/description (if there is no open bug for that
already).

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Bad topology way level 2

2018-01-15 Thread OSMDoudou
Unclassified looks the better option, because this small road segment is
admittedly not of the width and length you could expect from a primary_link.



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Bad topology way level 2

2018-01-15 Thread Steve Doerr
There is a philosophy in some parts that the roads of a particular class 
should form a continuous network with other roads of that class or 
higher, with no 'dead ends'. So primary roads should link to other 
primary roads or to trunks or motorways. In UK terms, 
highway=residential is equivalent to highway=unclassified with the 
additional attribute of having housing along it. So in theory, this link 
road could be considered highway=unclassified.



On the other hand the wiki at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Link_roads consistently 
associates _link values with the higher of the two classifications 
connected, so primary_link is correct for linking a primary to a 
residential road.



Basically, these two philosophies are incompatible, and you're entitled 
to choose whichever one you prefer. And therefore to ignore any Osmose 
errors that do not apply to your chosen philosophy.



Steve


On 15/01/2018 18:17, OSMDoudou wrote:


Hello,

Osmose reports an error with reason "Bad topology way level 2" [1] at 
this place [2] and I don't know how to resolve it.


There are no buildings around that piece of highway (I'm talking about 
the small segment of road, not the residential or the primary highway 
around) and its sole purpose is clearly to link the primary and the 
residential road.


So, according to table on the wiki page [3], it should be tagged as 
primary_link, but then Osmose reports a topology error.


Am I missing something ?

How would you tag it ?

Thx.

[1] http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/error/15188159403

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36971912

[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


[Tagging] Bad topology way level 2

2018-01-15 Thread OSMDoudou
Hello,

 

Osmose reports an error with reason "Bad topology way level 2" [1] at this
place [2] and I don't know how to resolve it.

 

There are no buildings around that piece of highway (I'm talking about the
small segment of road, not the residential or the primary highway around)
and its sole purpose is clearly to link the primary and the residential
road.

 

So, according to table on the wiki page [3], it should be tagged as
primary_link, but then Osmose reports a topology error.

 

Am I missing something ?

 

How would you tag it ?

 

Thx.

 

[1] http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/error/15188159403

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36971912

[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging