Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

2019-09-14 Thread Warin

On 15/09/19 01:59, Ruben wrote:

On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:59:29 +1000, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:

'opening_hours="By appointment, phone "' (the ### is the phone number that 
I don't recall of the top of my head.

I think this is more versatile than yet another value as it allows an 
individual response in the local language.

I see "local language" as a big drawback in the following reasons:
- Data consumers might want to handle appointments differently. For example a POI browser that 
shows "now open" could use a different colour for "now open on appointment".
- Tourists using OsmAnd don't always understand the local language.
- In bi-lingual areas like the capital of Belgium, using local language would 
mean using both Dutch *and* French.


You may find the person answering only has local language. If bi-lingual then 
either language could be used, upto the mapper.



Do you have a more concrete example of what versatility you would be after? Something 
like Mo-Fr 09:00-18:00 "on appointment for non-members"?

Also note that the appointment keyword would allow additional comments. This works when 
specific instructions are needed like Mo-Fr 09:00-18:00 appointment "don't call, use 
the website".


A free text entry allows for anything. Could not be more versatile. If I came 
up with something requiring versatility and then you developed for it, then 
there would be yet another exception and so on.
There is always going to be some exception, free text entry provides for any 
exception.


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

2019-09-14 Thread Ruben
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:59:29 +1000, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 'opening_hours="By appointment, phone "' (the ### is the phone number 
> that I don't recall of the top of my head.
> 
> I think this is more versatile than yet another value as it allows an 
> individual response in the local language.

I see "local language" as a big drawback in the following reasons:
- Data consumers might want to handle appointments differently. For example a 
POI browser that shows "now open" could use a different colour for "now open on 
appointment".
- Tourists using OsmAnd don't always understand the local language.
- In bi-lingual areas like the capital of Belgium, using local language would 
mean using both Dutch *and* French.

Do you have a more concrete example of what versatility you would be after? 
Something like Mo-Fr 09:00-18:00 "on appointment for non-members"?

Also note that the appointment keyword would allow additional comments. This 
works when specific instructions are needed like Mo-Fr 09:00-18:00 appointment 
"don't call, use the website".

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

2019-09-11 Thread Simon Poole

Am 10.09.2019 um 10:00 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 8. Sep 2019, at 22:11, Simon Poole  > wrote:
>
>> Isn't this semantically in the end not the same as "unknown" (as in any
>> application would have to equate this to  "you have to inquire if it is
>> open")?
>
>
> it may be the same for apps, it isn’t for mappers, “unknown” is an
> imperative for surveying it.

This is -not- supported by the existing documentation
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Summary_syntax


> It may also make a difference for some searching for such features,
> because unknown means you might be lucky and they’ll serve you, by
> appointment means you must not even try if they might be open.
>
That on the other hand might be a useful distinction.

Simon


> I welcome documenting this value, as it is already used with varying
> syntax more than 500 times, so it is clear mappers want
> it: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/opening_hours#values
>
> Cheers Martin 
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

2019-09-11 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
I would use the "phone" key rather than mixing phone numbers in the opening
hours value. If there are several phone numbers and one is dedicated for
making appointments, it could be a phone subtag like phone:appointments=###

Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

2019-09-10 Thread Warin

The key 'opening_hours' has a free from text entry facility.

I have used this where a museum is open by appointment only thus

'opening_hours="By appointment, phone "' (the ### is the phone number that 
I don't recall of the top of my head.


I think this is more versatile than yet another value as it allows an 
individual response in the local language.



On 09/09/19 06:11, Simon Poole wrote:

Isn't this semantically in the end not the same as "unknown" (as in any
application would have to equate this to  "you have to inquire if it is
open")?

Am 08.09.2019 um 17:10 schrieb Ruben:

Proposal for opening_hours syntax element "appointment", similar to "open" and 
"off":

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Opening_hours:_standard_appointment_syntax

Kind regards
Ruben

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

2019-09-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer


sent from a phone

> On 8. Sep 2019, at 22:11, Simon Poole  wrote:
> 
> Isn't this semantically in the end not the same as "unknown" (as in any
> application would have to equate this to  "you have to inquire if it is
> open")?


it may be the same for apps, it isn’t for mappers, “unknown” is an imperative 
for surveying it. It may also make a difference for some searching for such 
features, because unknown means you might be lucky and they’ll serve you, by 
appointment means you must not even try if they might be open.

I welcome documenting this value, as it is already used with varying syntax 
more than 500 times, so it is clear mappers want it: 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/opening_hours#values

Cheers Martin ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

2019-09-08 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 01:12, Ruben  wrote:

> Proposal for opening_hours syntax element "appointment", similar to "open"
> and "off":
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Opening_hours:_standard_appointment_syntax


Not a bad idea at all, Ruben.

On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 06:13, Simon Poole  wrote:

> Isn't this semantically in the end not the same as "unknown"


In some ways I suppose you could say it is unknown, but in other's it's not
quite the same!


> (as in any
> application would have to equate this to  "you have to inquire if it is
> open")?
>

Yes, you would - it tells you that you can't just walk in the door & expect
to be seen, you have to ring them & make an appointment.

Thanks

Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

2019-09-08 Thread Simon Poole
Isn't this semantically in the end not the same as "unknown" (as in any
application would have to equate this to  "you have to inquire if it is
open")?

Am 08.09.2019 um 17:10 schrieb Ruben:
> Proposal for opening_hours syntax element "appointment", similar to "open" 
> and "off":
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Opening_hours:_standard_appointment_syntax
>
> Kind regards
> Ruben
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

2019-09-08 Thread Ruben
Proposal for opening_hours syntax element "appointment", similar to "open" and 
"off":

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Opening_hours:_standard_appointment_syntax

Kind regards
Ruben

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging