Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - roller_coaster key

2013-01-11 Thread John Sturdy 
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Rob Nickerson
rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:

 One point that jumps to mind: I would imagine that you will find the
 layer=* tag to be better than level=*.

+1

__John

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - roller_coaster key

2013-01-10 Thread Deanna Earley 

Hi all.

I have proposed the start of the roller_coaster key as way to 
standardise on tagging of roller coaster features. Especially now we're 
getting details enough to be able to include this extra information.


http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/key:roller_coaster

The initial proposal is just for the track and station values but other 
values will be valid.


Any and all comments and feedback are welcome on the talk page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/key:roller_coaster

Many thanks
(Resent as my original on 2012/12/10 doesn't seem to have been approved)

--
Deanna Earley (d...@earlsoft.co.uk)

web:http://www.earlsoft.co.uk
phone:  +44 (0)780 8369596

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - roller_coaster key

2013-01-10 Thread Rob Nickerson 
Good start :-)

One point that jumps to mind: I would imagine that you will find the
layer=* tag to be better than level=*.

All the best,
Rob
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging